Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 21 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Ultrasound operators' experience influences choledocholithiasis diagnosis

The latest Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology finds that high-resolution ultrasound carried out by experienced examiners has high diagnostic accuracy in choledocholithiasis.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Trans abdominal ultrasound is the most frequently used imaging method for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Dr Steffen Rickes and colleagues from Germany evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

The research team assessed whether the diagnostic accuracy depended on the operator's experience.

The researchers also compared high-resolution ultrasound in comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold standard.

The team included 126 patients that were referred because of clinically and biochemically suspected common bile duct stones from 2003 to 2004.

The researchers excluded 2 patients because they refused to undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Bile duct stones were correctly found by ultrasound in 22 out of 27 patients
Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Consequently, the study comprised 124 patients, of which 86 were female with a mean age of 63 years.

High-resolution ultrasound was performed by operators who were unaware of the results of other imaging procedures.

The definitive diagnosis was established by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Experienced examiners investigated 35 out of 124 patients.

The team found that 77% had stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Bile duct stones were correctly found by ultrasound in 22 out of 27 patients.

The team noted that of the 8 patients without stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, 1 false-positive diagnosis was made with ultrasound.

Correct diagnoses were made in 29 out of 35 patients investigated by experienced examiners.

The researchers reported that 89 out of 124 patients were investigated by less-experienced examiners.

About 61% were found to have stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Choledocholithiasis was found correctly in only 25 out of 54 patients.

Of the 35 patients without stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, 3 false-positive diagnoses were made with ultrasound.

The team observed correct diagnoses in 57 of 89 patients investigated by less-experienced examiners.

Dr Rickes' concluded, “High-resolution ultrasound carried out by experienced examiners has a high diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.”

“Therefore, good training and continued experience are prerequisites for successful sonographic detection of bile duct stones using ultrasound.”

“Under these conditions, further expensive and invasive methods such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography."

"Endoscopic ultrasonography may not be necessary in cases with a clear sonographic diagnosis”

Scand J Gastroenterol 2006: 41(7): 838-43
27 June 2006

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 21 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 21 February 2018 
Adalimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve Crohn's
 21 February 2018 
Cystic fibrosis and colorectal cancer
 20 February 2018 
Complications and surveillance colonoscopies
 20 February 2018 
Treatment algorithm for polyp cancers
 20 February 2018 
Predictors of postoperative infection in Crohn's
 19 February 2018 
Screening colonoscopy in the right and left colon
 19 February 2018 
NAFLD prevalence in the USA
 19 February 2018 
Fructans in children with IBS

 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV
 29 January 2018 
Food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 26 January 2018 
Tofacitinib vs biological therapies for ulcerative colitis
 26 January 2018 
Optimizing selection of biologics in IBD
 26 January 2018 
Nutritional risk and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy outcomes
 25 January 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measure for functional dyspepsia
 25 January 2018 
Predicting intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery
 25 January 2018 
Predictors of gastric cancer risk
 24 January 2018 
Risk factors underlying previously undiagnosed cirrhosis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us