Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 May 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcer

Laparoscopic repair seems better than open repair for low-risk patients, however, open repair may be more appropriate in high-risk patients, reports the latest issue of the British Journal of Surgery.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

The advantages of laparoscopic over open repair for perforated peptic ulcer are not as obvious as they may seem.

Dr Lunevicius and Dr Morkevicius summarized the published trials comparing the 2 approaches.

The research team included 2 randomized prospective, 5 non-randomized prospective and 8 retrospective studies in the analysis.

Relevant trials were identified from the Medline/Pubmed database and the reference lists of the retrieved papers were then analyzed.

Laparoscopic repair had shorter hospital stay, less wound infection and lower mortality rate
British Journal of Surgery

The outcome measures used by the team were operating time, postoperative analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay, and return to normal diet.

The researchers also assessed usual activities, and complication and mortality rates.

Published data were tested for heterogeneity by means of a 2 test and meta-analysis methods were used to measure the pooled estimate of the effect size.

The researchers reported that 1113 patients are represented from 15 selected studies, of whom 535 were treated by laparoscopic repair and 578 by open repair.

The research team noted that 102 patients underwent conversion to open repair.

Significant findings in favour of laparoscopic repair were less analgesic use, shorter hospital stay, less wound infection and lower mortality rate.

The researchers observed that shorter operating time and less suture-site leakage were advantages of open repair.

In addition, the team noted that hospital stay, operating time and analgesic use were significantly heterogeneous in the papers analyzed.

Dr Lunevicius and colleague commented, “Laparoscopic repair seems better than open repair for low-risk patients.”

“However, limited knowledge about its benefits and risks compared with open repair suggests that the latter, more familiar, approach may be more appropriate in high-risk patients.”

“Further studies are needed.”

Br J Surg 2005: 92(10): 1195-1207
29 September 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 May 2018 
Precision medicine for tumors
 24 May 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measures in IBD trials
 24 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and outcomes in drug-induced liver injury
 23 May 2018 
High body mass index is and ulcerative colitis
 23 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease
 23 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 22 May 2018 
Worldwide H.pylori prevalence
 22 May 2018 
PPI and risk of stroke
 22 May 2018 
Online tool predicts bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection
 21 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence and quality of life in IBD
 21 May 2018 
PPI use and cognitive decline
 21 May 2018 
Depressive symptoms in IBD youth
 18 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 17 May 2018 
IBD and later extraintestinal manifestations
 17 May 2018 
Repeat stool DNA testing
 17 May 2018 
IBS and chronic fatigue following GI infection
 16 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 16 May 2018 
Diagnostic delay in Crohn's disease
 16 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 15 May 2018 
Guidelines for management of Crohn's
 15 May 2018 
New therapies for CDI
 15 May 2018 
Hep B in the Grey Zone
 14 May 2018 
Blood test for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH
 14 May 2018 
Outcomes at bariatric centers of excellence
 14 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s
 11 May 2018 
Detection of undiagnosed celiac disease
 11 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and drug-induced liver injury
 10 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening
 10 May 2018 
Post‐operative complications in elderly IBD
 10 May 2018 
Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
 09 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 09 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence
 09 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Omitting antibiotics in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 07 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps
 04 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 04 May 2018 
National Institutes of Health workshop and obesity
 04 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening and ethnic inequities
 03 May 2018 
Gastrointestinal ultrasound in IBD
 03 May 2018 
Ultransonography in postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's
 02 May 2018 
Hep C antiviral treatment and liver cancer risk
 02 May 2018 
Symptom assessment in cirrhotic ascites
 02 May 2018 
Chronic Hep B
 01 May 2018 
European guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
 01 May 2018 
Interferon‐free regimens in Hep C
 01 May 2018 
Age at IBD onset and extraintestinal complications
 30 April 2018 
Formula for preterm infants
 30 April 2018 
Primary antibiotic resistance and sequential therapy for H. pylori
 27 April 2018 
Eastern and western practices for endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 27 April 2018 
Anxiety scale for chronic esophageal disease
 27 April 2018 
Disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis
 26 April 2018 
Obesity and physical activity in diverticulosis
 26 April 2018 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis in the USA
 25 April 2018 
Aspirin and pancreatic cancer
 25 April 2018 
Central mediators of irinotecan-induced steatohepatitis
 25 April 2018 
Neuroimaging in Hep C
 24 April 2018 
Scoring system identifies cancer risk in Barrett's
 24 April 2018 
Microbiome in athletes vs sedentary subjects
 23 April 2018 
Genome-wide study on HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us