Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection

Under traditional perioperative treatment, lapararoscopic colonic resections show clinically relevant advantages in selected patients, reports the most recent article in the The Cochrane Library.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Colorectal resections are common surgical procedures all over the world.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically feasible in a considerable amount of patients under elective conditions.

Several short-term benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resection have been proposed.

The short-term benefits include less pain, less morbidity, improved reconvalescence and better quality of life.

Dr Schwenk conducted a review to compare laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection.

The researchers considered the possible benefits of the laparoscopic method in the short-term postoperative period, up to 3 months post surgery.

The research team searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from1991 to 2004.

Intraoperative blood was less and operative time was longer in laparoscopic surgery
The Cochrane Library

The team handsearched various surgery journals from 1991 to 2004, as well as abstracts from the society meetings.

All randomised-controlled trial were included regardless of the language of publication.

Results from papers were extracted independently by 3 observers on a predefined data sheet, solving disagreements by discussion.

'REVMAN 4.2' was used for statistical analysis, and the mean differences were used for analysing continuous variables.

If studies reported medians and ranges instead of means and standard deviations, the team assumed the difference of medians to be equal to the difference of means.

If no measure of dispersion was given, the researchers tried to obtain these data from the authors or estimated standard deviation as the mean or median.

Data were pooled and the team calculated weighted mean differences with their 95% confidence using random effects models.

The researchers included and analysed 25 randomised controlled trials.

Methodological quality of most of these trials was only moderate and perioperative treatment was very traditional in most studies.

The team found that operative time was longer in laparoscopic surgery, but intraoperative blood was less than in conventional surgery.

The researchers observed that intensity of postoperative pain and duration of postoperative ileus was shorter after laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Pulmonary function was improved after a laparoscopic approach.

The team noted that total morbidity and surgical morbidity was decreased in the laparoscopic groups.

General morbidity and mortality was not different between both groups, and until the 30th postoperative day, quality of life was better in laparoscopic patients.

In addition, the team noted that postoperative hospital stay was less in laparoscopic patients.

Dr Schwenk's team concludes, "Under traditional perioperative treatment, lapararoscopic colonic resections show clinically relevant advantages in selected patients.”

“If the long-term oncological results of laparoscopic and conventional resection of colonic carcinoma show equivalent results, the laparoscopic approach should be preferred in patients suitable for this approach to colectomy.”

Cochrane 2005(3): ISSN 1465-1858
04 August 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 23 February 2018 
Patients on antithrombotic agents undergoing emergency and elective endoscopy
 23 February 2018 
Heavy metals on a gluten-free diet
 23 February 2018 
MRI and NAFLD
 22 February 2018 
Outcomes with Crohn’s after infliximab withdrawal
 22 February 2018 
Elderly onset of IBD

 22 February 2018 
Autophagy enhancers
 21 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 21 February 2018 
Adalimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve Crohn's
 21 February 2018 
Cystic fibrosis and colorectal cancer
 20 February 2018 
Complications and surveillance colonoscopies
 20 February 2018 
Treatment algorithm for polyp cancers
 20 February 2018 
Predictors of postoperative infection in Crohn's
 19 February 2018 
Screening colonoscopy in the right and left colon
 19 February 2018 
NAFLD prevalence in the USA
 19 February 2018 
Fructans in children with IBS

 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV
 29 January 2018 
Food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 26 January 2018 
Tofacitinib vs biological therapies for ulcerative colitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us