Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 18 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Mutation detection in patients with colorectal cancer

Research in this month's JAMA confirms the heterogeneity of mismatch repair mutations and reveal that many mutations in colorectal cancer cases would be missed using conventional genomic DNA sequencing alone.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

The accurate identification and interpretation of germline mutations in mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer cases is critical for clinical management.

Current data suggest that mismatch repair mutations are highly heterogeneous and that many mutations are not detected when conventional DNA sequencing alone is used.

Dr Casey and colleagues undertook a study to evaluate the potential of conversion analysis compared with DNA sequencing alone to detect heterogeneous germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in colorectal cancer patients.

The researchers conducted a multicenter study with patients who participate in the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

The investigators performed a mutation analyses in participant samples determined to have a high probability of carrying mismatch repair germline mutations.

The research team analyzed samples from a total of 64 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer cases, 8 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer–like cases, and 17 cases diagnosed prior to age 50 years from June 2002 to June 2003.

The researchers compared the genomic DNA sequencing with the classification of family members as carriers or noncarriers of germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6.

The researchers also compared mutation data from conversion analysis compared with genomic DNA sequencing.

Conversion analysis identified all mutations detected by genomic DNA sequencing
JAMA

Using genomic DNA sequencing the investigators identified 28 likely deleterious exon mutations, 4 in-frame deletion mutations, 16 missense changes, and 22 putative splice site mutations.

Conversion analysis identified all mutations detected by genomic DNA sequencing.

In addition the team found an exon mutation, 12 large genomic deletions, and 1 exon duplication mutation.

This yielded an increase of 33% in diagnostic yield of deleterious mutations.

After the conversion analysis the researchers were able to show that 4 of 16 missense changes resulted in exon skipping in transcripts and that 17 of 22 putative splice site mutations affected splicing or mRNA transcript stability.

Analysis provided an increase of 56% in the diagnostic yield of genetic testing compared with genomic DNA sequencing alone.

Dr Casey commented, "The data confirm the heterogeneity of mismatch repair mutations and reveal that many mutations in colorectal cancer cases would be missed using conventional genomic DNA sequencing alone."

"Conversion analysis substantially increases the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for mismatch repair mutations in patients diagnosed as having colorectal cancer."

JAMA; 2005: 293 (7): 799-809.
18 February 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV
 29 January 2018 
Food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 26 January 2018 
Tofacitinib vs biological therapies for ulcerative colitis
 26 January 2018 
Optimizing selection of biologics in IBD
 26 January 2018 
Nutritional risk and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy outcomes
 25 January 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measure for functional dyspepsia
 25 January 2018 
Predicting intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery
 25 January 2018 
Predictors of gastric cancer risk
 24 January 2018 
Risk factors underlying previously undiagnosed cirrhosis
 24 January 2018 
Ethnicity influences phenotype in IBD
 24 January 2018 
Bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment
 23 January 2018 
Atrophic gastritis after H. pylori eradication
 23 January 2018 
Ectopic pregnancy in women with IBD
 23 January 2018 
Celiac disease in IBS in the USA
 22 January 2018 
Improving symptoms in GERD
 22 January 2018 
Costs of biologic therapies for IBD in the USA
 22 January 2018 
Western vs Asian guidelines for colon cancer management

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us