Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 19 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice

The latest issue of Gut examines narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice.

News image

Accurate optical characterization and removal of small adenomas (<10 mm) at colonoscopy would allow hyperplastic polyps to be left in situ and surveillance intervals to be determined without the need for histopathology. 

Although accurate in specialist practice the performance of narrow band imaging, colonoscopy in routine clinical practice is poorly understood.

Professor Colin Rees and colleagues from the United Kingdom compared narrow band imaging-assisted optical diagnosis with reference standard histopathological findings in a prospective, blinded study, which recruited adults undergoing routine colonoscopy in 6 general hospitals in the UK. 

Participating colonoscopists were trained using the Narrow Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification. 

By comparing the optical and histological findings in patients with only small polyps, the researchers determined test sensitivity at the patient level using 2 thresholds, including the presence of adenoma and need for surveillance. 

The research team compared accuracy of identifying adenomatous polyps <10 mm at the polyp level using hierarchical models, allowing determinants of accuracy to be explored.

The team found that of the 1688 patients recruited, 43% had polyps <10 mm with 79% having only polyps <10 mm. 

Test sensitivity by narrow band imaging optical diagnosis was 83%
Gut
Test sensitivity by narrow band imaging optical diagnosis was 83%, significantly less than the 95% sensitivity this study was powered to detect. 

Test sensitivity was 73%. 

Analyzed at the polyp level, the researchers noted that test sensitivity was 76%. 

In fully adjusted analyses, the researchers observed that test sensitivity was 99% if two or more narrow band imaging adenoma characteristics were identified. 

Neither colonoscopist expertise, confidence in diagnosis nor use of high definition colonoscopy independently improved test accuracy.

Professor Rees concludes, "This large multicenter study demonstrates that narrow band imaging optical diagnosis cannot currently be recommended for application in routine clinical practice."

"Further work is required to evaluate whether variation in test accuracy is related to polyp characteristics or colonoscopist training."

Gut 2017;66:887-895
20 April 2017

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 19 February 2018 
The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in the right colon was not significantly different from that in the left colon/rectum
 19 February 2018 
No significant differences, among racial or ethnic groups, found in patients with significant fibrosis
 19 February 2018 
Hydrogen production greater in patients on a fructan-containing diet, than those following a maltodextrin-containing diet

 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV
 29 January 2018 
Food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 26 January 2018 
Tofacitinib vs biological therapies for ulcerative colitis
 26 January 2018 
Optimizing selection of biologics in IBD
 26 January 2018 
Nutritional risk and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy outcomes
 25 January 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measure for functional dyspepsia
 25 January 2018 
Predicting intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery
 25 January 2018 
Predictors of gastric cancer risk
 24 January 2018 
Risk factors underlying previously undiagnosed cirrhosis
 24 January 2018 
Ethnicity influences phenotype in IBD
 24 January 2018 
Bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment
 23 January 2018 
Atrophic gastritis after H. pylori eradication
 23 January 2018 
Ectopic pregnancy in women with IBD
 23 January 2018 
Celiac disease in IBS in the USA

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us