Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 20 November 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Can EUS or MRCP replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease?

Initial EUS strategy in patients with suspected biliary disease has the greatest cost-utility by avoiding unnecessary ERCP examinations, according to a study in October's American Journal of Gastroenterology.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

A team from Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, compared the performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ERCP in the same patients with suspected extrahepatic biliary disease.

The economic outcomes of EUS-, MRCP-, and ERCP-based diagnostic strategies were evaluated.

A total of 30 patients referred for ERCP with suspected biliary disease were included in the prospective study.

MRCP and EUS were performed within 24 hours before ERCP.

The investigators were blinded to the results of the alternative imaging studies.

ERCP cholangiogram failed in 1 patient, and another patient did not complete MRCP because of claustrophobia.

The final diagnoses (n = 28) were CBD stone (mean = 4 mm) in 5 patients, biliary stricture in 3 patients, and normal biliary tree in 20.

Of the patients, 2 had pancreatitis after therapeutic ERCP, 1 after precut sphincterotomy followed by a normal cholangiogram.

Cost per person:
ERCP: $1346
MRCP: $1145
EUS: $1111
American Journal Of Gastroenterology

The researchers found that EUS was more sensitive than MRCP in the detection of choledocolithiasis (80% vs 40%), with similar specificity.

In addition, MRCP had a poor specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of biliary stricture (76%/25%) compared to EUS (100%/100%), with similar sensitivity.

The overall accuracy of MRCP for any abnormality was 61%, compared to 89% for EUS.

Among those patients with a normal biliary tree, the proportion correctly identified with each test was 95% for EUS and 65% for MRCP.

The cost for each strategy per patient evaluated was found to be $1346 for ERCP, $1111 for EUS, and $1145 for MRCP.

Author J. M. Scheiman, of the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, said on behalf of colleagues, "In this patient population with a low disease prevalence, EUS was superior to MRCP for choledocholithiasis.

"EUS was most useful for confirming a normal biliary tree and should be considered a low-risk alternative to ERCP."

"Although MRCP had the lowest procedural reimbursement, the initial EUS strategy had the greatest cost-utility by avoiding unnecessary ERCP examinations," it was concluded.

Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96(10): 2900-4
09 November 2001

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 20 November 2017 
Barriers to hepatitis C treatment
 20 November 2017 
Socioeconomic characteristics in diverticular disease
 20 November 2017 
Endoscopic indices of disease activity for Crohn’s
 17 November 2017 
Food elimination diets for treatment of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
 17 November 2017 
PPI use and cognitive function in women
 17 November 2017 
Predicting microscopic colitis
 16 November 2017 
NAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma and survival after orthotopic liver transplant
 16 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and severe maternal morbidity
 16 November 2017 
Celiac disease screening in adult first-degree relatives
 15 November 2017 
Breastfeeding and the risk of IBD
 15 November 2017 
Medication nonadherence and health care costs
 15 November 2017 
Predicting recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
HBV/HCV coinfection and cirrhosis
 14 November 2017 
Sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis
 13 November 2017 
GI bleeding in patients taking non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
 13 November 2017 
Genetic polymorphisms, fatty acids and ulcerative colitis
 13 November 2017 
Flares after immunomodulator withdrawal in Crohn's
 10 November 2017 
Thiopurines vs TNF and lymphoma risk in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer
 09 November 2017 
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
 09 November 2017 
Irradiated rectal cancer and chemoradiotherapy
 09 November 2017 
Environmental factors and IBD
 08 November 2017 
Prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 08 November 2017 
Optimal management of postoperative Crohn's disease
 07 November 2017 
Community Screening for Helicobacter pylori
 07 November 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 07 November 2017 
Mesocolic excision for colon cancer
 06 November 2017 
Food elimination diet for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 November 2017 
Biologic agents and obesity in children with IBD
 06 November 2017 
Liver cancer burden despite extensive use of antiviral agents
 03 November 2017 
Statins and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis
 03 November 2017 
Propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
 03 November 2017 
Asthma and IBD development
 02 November 2017 
Diverticulitis and emergency department burden
 02 November 2017 
Rural residence and risk of IBD
 02 November 2017 
Sexual functioning in Hep C
 01 November 2017 
Heartburn relief in adolescents with GERD
 01 November 2017 
Autoimmune pancreatitis in children
 31 October 2017 
Follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests
 31 October 2017 
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
 30 October 2017 
Local recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 30 October 2017 
Low-flow ascites pump in refractory cirrhosis
 30 October 2017 
Medical therapy of patients with pediatric-onset IBD
 27 October 2017 
NAFLD in advanced fibrosis in the USA
 27 October 2017 
Early readmission in cirrhosis after bacterial infections
 26 October 2017 
Predicting response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's
 26 October 2017 
Conversion to open laparotomy in rectal cancer
 25 October 2017 
Conversion of colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 25 October 2017 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 25 October 2017 
Rifaximin and survival in hepatic encephalopathy
 24 October 2017 
Eosinophilic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids
 24 October 2017 
Meta-analysis in nutritiona research
 23 October 2017 
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma in liver resection
 23 October 2017 
Outcome of hepatic sarcoidosis
 20 October 2017 
Conversion of planned colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 20 October 2017 
Hospital readmissions reduction program
 19 October 2017 
Surgical anastomosis at 1-year colorectal cancer surveillance
 19 October 2017 
Fecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us