Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 21 November 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Advanced cytologic techniques detect pancreatobiliary cancer

Fluorescence and digital image analysis increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures, reports October's Gastroenterology.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization have recently been developed to help identify malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.

Dr Laura Moreno Luna and colleagues from Minnesota evaluated these 2 advanced cytologic techniques for detecting aneuploidy.

The researchers assessed the clinical utility of cytology, digital image analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the identifying malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.

The research team conducted brush cytologic specimens from 233 consecutive patients.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization had a sensitivity between 35% and 60%
Gastroenterology

The patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary strictures.

The research team stratified 33 strictures as proximal, and 114 as distal based on whether they occurred above or below the cystic duct, respectively.

The researchers analyzed 86 strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis separately.

The research team found that the performances of the tests were similar despite the stratification.

Conventional cytology has a low sensitivity, between 4% and 20%, but had 100% specificity.

Because of the high specificity for cytology, the team assessed the performance of the other tests when conventional cytology was negative.

In this clinical context, the team found that fluorescence in situ hybridization had a sensitivity between 35% and 60%.

The team observed that fluorescence had this sensitivity when assessing for chromosomal gains while preserving the specificity of cytology.

The sensitivity and specificity of digital image analysis was intermediate as compared with routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

However, the team noted that the specificity of digital image analysis was additive to fluorescence in situ hybridization values.

It demonstrated only trisomy of chromosome 7 or chromosome 3.

Dr Luna's team concludes, “Fluorescence in situ hybridization and digital image analysis increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant pancreatobiliary tract strictures over that obtained by conventional cytology.”

“It also maintains an acceptable specificity.”

Gastroenterol 2006: 131(4): 1064-72
18 October 2006

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 21 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and maternal mortality
 21 November 2017 
Preoperative optimization in IBD patients
 21 November 2017 
Cholangiopathy in critically ill patients
 20 November 2017 
Barriers to hepatitis C treatment
 20 November 2017 
Socioeconomic characteristics in diverticular disease
 20 November 2017 
Endoscopic indices of disease activity for Crohn’s
 17 November 2017 
Food elimination diets for treatment of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
 17 November 2017 
PPI use and cognitive function in women
 17 November 2017 
Predicting microscopic colitis
 16 November 2017 
NAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma and survival after orthotopic liver transplant
 16 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and severe maternal morbidity
 16 November 2017 
Celiac disease screening in adult first-degree relatives
 15 November 2017 
Breastfeeding and the risk of IBD
 15 November 2017 
Medication nonadherence and health care costs
 15 November 2017 
Predicting recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
HBV/HCV coinfection and cirrhosis
 14 November 2017 
Sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis
 13 November 2017 
GI bleeding in patients taking non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
 13 November 2017 
Genetic polymorphisms, fatty acids and ulcerative colitis
 13 November 2017 
Flares after immunomodulator withdrawal in Crohn's
 10 November 2017 
Thiopurines vs TNF and lymphoma risk in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer
 09 November 2017 
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
 09 November 2017 
Irradiated rectal cancer and chemoradiotherapy
 09 November 2017 
Environmental factors and IBD
 08 November 2017 
Prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 08 November 2017 
Optimal management of postoperative Crohn's disease
 07 November 2017 
Community Screening for Helicobacter pylori
 07 November 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 07 November 2017 
Mesocolic excision for colon cancer
 06 November 2017 
Food elimination diet for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 November 2017 
Biologic agents and obesity in children with IBD
 06 November 2017 
Liver cancer burden despite extensive use of antiviral agents
 03 November 2017 
Statins and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis
 03 November 2017 
Propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
 03 November 2017 
Asthma and IBD development
 02 November 2017 
Diverticulitis and emergency department burden
 02 November 2017 
Sexual functioning in Hep C
 02 November 2017 
Rural residence and risk of IBD
 01 November 2017 
Heartburn relief in adolescents with GERD
 01 November 2017 
Autoimmune pancreatitis in children
 31 October 2017 
Follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests
 31 October 2017 
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
 30 October 2017 
Local recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 30 October 2017 
Low-flow ascites pump in refractory cirrhosis
 30 October 2017 
Medical therapy of patients with pediatric-onset IBD
 27 October 2017 
NAFLD in advanced fibrosis in the USA
 27 October 2017 
Early readmission in cirrhosis after bacterial infections
 26 October 2017 
Predicting response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's
 26 October 2017 
Conversion to open laparotomy in rectal cancer
 25 October 2017 
Conversion of colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 25 October 2017 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 25 October 2017 
Rifaximin and survival in hepatic encephalopathy
 24 October 2017 
Eosinophilic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids
 24 October 2017 
Meta-analysis in nutritiona research
 23 October 2017 
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma in liver resection
 23 October 2017 
Outcome of hepatic sarcoidosis
 20 October 2017 
Conversion of planned colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us