Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 19 April 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure

The Slimline system on esophageal acid exposure compares to the Bravo system largely because of a flawed software scheme for electrode thermal calibration, and both systems can be improved by using an in vivo pH reference, reports this month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Dr John Pandolfino and colleagues from Illinois compared esophageal acid exposure data obtained during simultaneous esophageal pH studies.

The research team compared the use of the Bravo wireless and the Slimline catheter-Mark III Digitrapper pH systems.

The team reported that 25 asymptomatic subjects underwent endoscopy with endoclip placement at the squamocolumnar junction and manometry to localize the lower esophageal sphincter.

A Bravo capsule was placed 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction and a Slimline catheter 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter and relative positions were checked fluoroscopically.

The researchers compared synchronized pH data by manual extraction into Excel spreadsheets and an in vivo pH reference was established with swallows of orange juice.

Acid exposure time was greater with Slimline compared to Bravo systems
American Journal of Gastroenterology

The team found that the median acid exposure time was greater with the Slimline compared to the Bravo system but electrode positions were similar.

The researchers noted that the dominant source of discrepancy between systems was an offset in recorded pH values around pH 4 as evidenced by the recorded values of the swallowed orange juice.

Bench-top testing suggested that this offset was attributable to the software designed to compensate for the difference in electrode recording characteristics between room and body temperature.

After adjusting the pH data sets to accurately reflect actual orange juice pH, the researchers observed that acid exposure between systems was similar.

Dr Pandolfino's team concludes, “The Slimline system on average over-recorded esophageal acid exposure compared to the Bravo system largely because of a flawed software scheme for electrode thermal calibration.”

“Accuracy of pH data sets from both systems can be improved by scrutiny for artifacts and use of an in vivo pH reference.”

Am J Gastroenterol 2005: 100(7): 1466
15 July 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 19 April 2018 
Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
 19 April 2018 
c-Myc expression and pancreatic cancer
 19 April 2018 
Olmesartan prescription in the USA
 18 April 2018 
Online tool predicts bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection
 18 April 2018 
Hep C treatment for sustained virologic response
 18 April 2018 
Endoscopic necrosectomy reduces risk of death 
 17 April 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening and ethnic inequities
 17 April 2018 
Training programs should consider radiation education for advanced endoscopy fellows
 17 April 2018 
Aspirin and pancreatic cancer
 16 April 2018 
Surgery for colorectal polyps has increased 
 16 April 2018 
Advanced fibrosis can be ruled out in primary health care patients
 16 April 2018 
Antibiotic use and colorectal adenoma
 13 April 2018 
Colorectal cancer cell lines
 13 April 2018 
Infliximab and corticosteroid-free clinical remission in Crohn's
 13 April 2018 
Teduglutide for children with short bowel syndrome
 12 April 2018 
Prescriptions for opiate drugs amongst primary care patients with IBD
 12 April 2018 
Lower GI bleeding related to comorbidity
 12 April 2018 
non–Clostridium difficile bacterial infections in IBD
 11 April 2018 
Physician perception of IBD trial results
 11 April 2018 
Bile acid deficiency in IBS 
 11 April 2018 
Stem cell therapy for fistulas in Crohn's
 10 April 2018 
Overweight in childhood and type 2 diabetes
 10 April 2018 
immunoglobulin G associates with clinical features of IBD
 10 April 2018 
T-cells repertoires in celiac disease
 09 April 2018 
Biomarker tests for colorectal cancer screening
 09 April 2018 
Fecal transplantation in C. difficile infection and treatment outcome 
 09 April 2018 
No weigh-loss drug improved all cardiometabolic risk factors
 06 April 2018 
Colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality
 06 April 2018 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and health-related quality of life
 06 April 2018 
Microbiome in athletes vs sedentary subjects
 05 April 2018 
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD treatment
 05 April 2018 
Random biopsies for neoplasia in IBD
 05 April 2018 
Scoring system identifies cancer risk in Barrett's
 04 April 2018 
Alpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency and liver disease
 04 April 2018 
PPI and risk of stroke
 04 April 2018 
Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced colon cancer
 29 March 2018 
Worldwide H.pylori prevalence
 29 March 2018 
Prevention of metachronous gastric cancer
 29 March 2018 
Acute lower GI bleeding
 28 March 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 28 March 2018 
Transition for young adults with IBD
 28 March 2018 
Amitriptyline in functional dyspepsia
 27 March 2018 
Emergency department utilization for IBD 
 27 March 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 27 March 2018 
Adult ulcerative colitis
 26 March 2018 
Biological therapy response in IBD 
 26 March 2018 
Obesity and diverticulosis
 26 March 2018 
Practice guidelines for chronic constipation
 23 March 2018 
Health-related quality of life in eosinophilic esophagitis
 23 March 2018 
Genetics and chronic liver disease
 23 March 2018 
Global prevalence of H.pylori
 22 March 2018 
H. pyloris and gastric cancer
 22 March 2018 
Pancreatitis after IBS treatment 
 22 March 2018 
Mechanisms of action in patients with IBS
 21 March 2018 
Panel markers for early detection of colon cancer

 21 March 2018 
Blood test differentiates celiac disease
 21 March 2018 
Patient characteristics and colonoscopy preparation
 20 March 2018 
Bloody vs coffee-grounds hematemesis
 20 March 2018 
Acute lower GI bleeding in the UK
 20 March 2018 
Therapeutic strategies for IBD

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us