Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 18 November 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Sedated versus unsedated esophagoscopy with video endoscope

Unsedated esophagoscopy with a 4-mm esophagoscope has diagnostic accuracy comparable to conventional endoscopy, and is tolerated best in patients with low anxiety levels and a high body mass index, reports June's issues of Endoscopy.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Unsedated upper endoscopy is an attractive alternative to conventional sedated endoscopy because it can reduce the cost, complications, and recovery time of the procedure.

The transnasal route was better tolerated than the transoral route, except with respect to pain
Endoscopy

However, it has not gained widespread acceptance in the United States.

A prototype 4-mm-diameter video esophagoscope is available.

Dr Thota and colleagues from Ohio compared unsedated esophagoscopy using this 4-mm esophagoscope with conventional sedated endoscopy.

The research team analyzed diagnostic accuracy and patient tolerance, to determine the optimal intubation route of transnasal versus transoral.

The team also identified the predictors of tolerance of unsedated endoscopy.

The researchers randomized outpatients presenting for conventional endoscopy to undergo unsedated esophagoscopy by either the transnasal or the transoral route, followed by conventional endoscopy.

The diagnostic findings, optical quality, and patient tolerance scores were assessed by the team.

Of the 137 patients approached, 90 patients were included.

The team reported that 44 patients were randomized to undergo esophagoscopy by the transnasal route and 46 by the transoral route before undergoing conventional esophagoscopy.

The team found that patient tolerance of unsedated esophagoscopy was comparable to that of conventional endoscopy.

The researchers observed that the transnasal route was better tolerated than the transoral route, except with respect to pain.

The team noted that 93 % in transnasal group and 91 % in transoral group were willing to have the procedure again.

The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy using the 4-mm video endoscope was similar to that of standard endoscopy.

The team found that patients who tolerated the procedure well had lower preprocedure anxiety scores and a higher body mass index than the other patients.

Dr Thota's team concludes, “Unsedated esophagoscopy with a 4-mm esophagoscope was well tolerated and has a level of diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of conventional endoscopy.”

“Factors associated with good tolerance of unsedated esophagoscopy were low anxiety levels, high body mass index, and use of the transnasal route.”

“Unsedated endoscopy may be offered to a selected group of patients based on these criteria.”

Endoscopy 2005: 37: 559-565
06 June 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 17 November 2017 
Food elimination diets for treatment of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
 17 November 2017 
PPI use and cognitive function in women
 17 November 2017 
Predicting microscopic colitis
 16 November 2017 
NAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma and survival after orthotopic liver transplant
 16 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and severe maternal morbidity
 16 November 2017 
Celiac disease screening in adult first-degree relatives
 15 November 2017 
Breastfeeding and the risk of IBD
 15 November 2017 
Medication nonadherence and health care costs
 15 November 2017 
Predicting recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
HBV/HCV coinfection and cirrhosis
 14 November 2017 
Sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis
 13 November 2017 
GI bleeding in patients taking non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
 13 November 2017 
Genetic polymorphisms, fatty acids and ulcerative colitis
 13 November 2017 
Flares after immunomodulator withdrawal in Crohn's
 10 November 2017 
Thiopurines vs TNF and lymphoma risk in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer
 09 November 2017 
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
 09 November 2017 
Irradiated rectal cancer and chemoradiotherapy
 09 November 2017 
Environmental factors and IBD
 08 November 2017 
Prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 08 November 2017 
Socioeconomic characteristics in diverticular disease
 08 November 2017 
Optimal management of postoperative Crohn's disease
 07 November 2017 
Community Screening for Helicobacter pylori
 07 November 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 07 November 2017 
Mesocolic excision for colon cancer
 06 November 2017 
Food elimination diet for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 November 2017 
Biologic agents and obesity in children with IBD
 06 November 2017 
Liver cancer burden despite extensive use of antiviral agents
 03 November 2017 
Statins and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis
 03 November 2017 
Propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
 03 November 2017 
Asthma and IBD development
 02 November 2017 
Diverticulitis and emergency department burden
 02 November 2017 
Rural residence and risk of IBD
 02 November 2017 
Sexual functioning in Hep C
 01 November 2017 
Heartburn relief in adolescents with GERD
 01 November 2017 
Barriers to hepatitis C treatment
 01 November 2017 
Autoimmune pancreatitis in children
 31 October 2017 
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
 31 October 2017 
Endoscopic indices of disease activity for Crohn’s
 31 October 2017 
Follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests
 30 October 2017 
Local recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 30 October 2017 
Low-flow ascites pump in refractory cirrhosis
 30 October 2017 
Medical therapy of patients with pediatric-onset IBD
 27 October 2017 
NAFLD in advanced fibrosis in the USA
 27 October 2017 
Early readmission in cirrhosis after bacterial infections
 26 October 2017 
Predicting response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's
 26 October 2017 
Conversion to open laparotomy in rectal cancer
 25 October 2017 
Conversion of colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 25 October 2017 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 25 October 2017 
Rifaximin and survival in hepatic encephalopathy
 24 October 2017 
Eosinophilic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids
 24 October 2017 
Meta-analysis in nutritiona research
 23 October 2017 
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma in liver resection
 23 October 2017 
Outcome of hepatic sarcoidosis
 20 October 2017 
Hospital readmissions reduction program
 20 October 2017 
Conversion of planned colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 19 October 2017 
Fecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening
 19 October 2017 
Current management of chylous ascites

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us