Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 May 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal cancer screening

Research in this week's Annals of Internal Medicine finds that computed tomographic colonography is highly specific, but the range of reported sensitivities is wide, raising concerns that must be resolved before it can be advocated for screening for colorectal cancer.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Computed tomographic colonography, also called virtual colonoscopy, is an evolving technology under evaluation as a new method of screening for colorectal cancer.

However, its performance as a test has varied widely across studies, and the reasons for these discrepancies are poorly defined.

Dr Mulhall and colleagues systematically reviewed the test performance of computed tomography colonography compared to colonoscopy or surgery and to assess variables that may affect test performance.

The researchers searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for English-language articles published between 1975 and 2005.

The team included prospective studies of adults undergoing computed tomographic colonography after full bowel preparation, with colonoscopy or surgery as the gold standard.

The research team selected studies that had used state-of-the-art technology, including at least a single-detector computed tomographic scanner with supine and prone positioning.

The included studies also had to have insufflation of the colon with air or carbon dioxide, collimation smaller than 5 mm, and both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional views during scan interpretation.

The evaluators of the colonogram had to be unaware of the findings from use of the gold standard test.

The sensitivity was heterogeneous but improved as polyp size increased for detection of polyps less than 6 mm
Annals of Internal Medicine

The team absracted data on sensitivity and specificity overall and for detection of polyps less than 6 mm, 6 to 9 mm, and greater than 9 mm in size.

Sensitivities and specificities weighted by sample size were calculated, and heterogeneity was explored by using stratified analyses and meta-regression.

The investigators found that 33 studies provided data on 6393 patients.

The sensitivity of computed tomographic colonography was heterogeneous but improved as polyp size increased by 48 % for detection of polyps less than 6 mm, 70% for polyps 6 to 9 mm, and 85% for polyps more than 9 mm.

The team noted that the characteristics of the computed tomographic colonography scanner, including width of collimation, type of detector, and mode of imaging, explained some of this heterogeneity.

In contrast, specificity was homogenous with 92% for detection of polyps less than 6 mm, 93 % for polyps 6 to 9 mm, and 97 % for polyps more than 9 mm.

The researchers observed that the studies differed widely, and the extractable variables explained only a small amount of the heterogeneity.

In addition, the researchers reported that only a few studies examined the newest computed tomographic colonography technology.

Dr Mulhall's team concluded, "Computed tomographic colonography is highly specific, but the range of reported sensitivities is wide."

"Patient or scanner characteristics do not fully account for this variability, but collimation, type of scanner, and mode of imaging explain some of the discrepancy."

"This heterogeneity raises concerns about consistency of performance and about technical variability."

"These issues must be resolved before computed tomographic colonography can be advocated for generalized screening for colorectal cancer."

Ann Int Med 2005: 142(8): 635 - 650
22 April 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 May 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measures in IBD trials
 24 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and outcomes in drug-induced liver injury
 24 May 2018 
Precision medicine for tumors
 23 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease
 23 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 23 May 2018 
High body mass index is and ulcerative colitis
 22 May 2018 
Worldwide H.pylori prevalence
 22 May 2018 
PPI and risk of stroke
 22 May 2018 
Online tool predicts bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection
 21 May 2018 
Depressive symptoms in IBD youth
 21 May 2018 
PPI use and cognitive decline
 21 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence and quality of life in IBD
 18 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 17 May 2018 
IBD and later extraintestinal manifestations
 17 May 2018 
Repeat stool DNA testing
 17 May 2018 
IBS and chronic fatigue following GI infection
 16 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 16 May 2018 
Diagnostic delay in Crohn's disease
 16 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 15 May 2018 
Guidelines for management of Crohn's
 15 May 2018 
Hep B in the Grey Zone
 15 May 2018 
New therapies for CDI
 14 May 2018 
Blood test for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH
 14 May 2018 
Outcomes at bariatric centers of excellence
 14 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s
 11 May 2018 
Detection of undiagnosed celiac disease
 11 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and drug-induced liver injury
 10 May 2018 
Post‐operative complications in elderly IBD
 10 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening
 10 May 2018 
Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
 09 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence
 09 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 09 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 07 May 2018 
Omitting antibiotics in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 07 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps
 04 May 2018 
National Institutes of Health workshop and obesity
 04 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 04 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening and ethnic inequities
 03 May 2018 
Gastrointestinal ultrasound in IBD
 03 May 2018 
Ultransonography in postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's
 02 May 2018 
Symptom assessment in cirrhotic ascites
 02 May 2018 
Hep C antiviral treatment and liver cancer risk
 02 May 2018 
Chronic Hep B
 01 May 2018 
European guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
 01 May 2018 
Interferon‐free regimens in Hep C
 01 May 2018 
Age at IBD onset and extraintestinal complications
 30 April 2018 
Formula for preterm infants
 30 April 2018 
Primary antibiotic resistance and sequential therapy for H. pylori
 27 April 2018 
Eastern and western practices for endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 27 April 2018 
Anxiety scale for chronic esophageal disease
 27 April 2018 
Disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis
 26 April 2018 
Obesity and physical activity in diverticulosis
 26 April 2018 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis in the USA
 25 April 2018 
Aspirin and pancreatic cancer
 25 April 2018 
Central mediators of irinotecan-induced steatohepatitis
 25 April 2018 
Neuroimaging in Hep C
 24 April 2018 
Scoring system identifies cancer risk in Barrett's
 24 April 2018 
Microbiome in athletes vs sedentary subjects
 23 April 2018 
Genome-wide study on HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us