Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 21 May 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Mutation detection in patients with colorectal cancer

Research in this month's JAMA confirms the heterogeneity of mismatch repair mutations and reveal that many mutations in colorectal cancer cases would be missed using conventional genomic DNA sequencing alone.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

The accurate identification and interpretation of germline mutations in mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer cases is critical for clinical management.

Current data suggest that mismatch repair mutations are highly heterogeneous and that many mutations are not detected when conventional DNA sequencing alone is used.

Dr Casey and colleagues undertook a study to evaluate the potential of conversion analysis compared with DNA sequencing alone to detect heterogeneous germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in colorectal cancer patients.

The researchers conducted a multicenter study with patients who participate in the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

The investigators performed a mutation analyses in participant samples determined to have a high probability of carrying mismatch repair germline mutations.

The research team analyzed samples from a total of 64 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer cases, 8 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer–like cases, and 17 cases diagnosed prior to age 50 years from June 2002 to June 2003.

The researchers compared the genomic DNA sequencing with the classification of family members as carriers or noncarriers of germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6.

The researchers also compared mutation data from conversion analysis compared with genomic DNA sequencing.

Conversion analysis identified all mutations detected by genomic DNA sequencing
JAMA

Using genomic DNA sequencing the investigators identified 28 likely deleterious exon mutations, 4 in-frame deletion mutations, 16 missense changes, and 22 putative splice site mutations.

Conversion analysis identified all mutations detected by genomic DNA sequencing.

In addition the team found an exon mutation, 12 large genomic deletions, and 1 exon duplication mutation.

This yielded an increase of 33% in diagnostic yield of deleterious mutations.

After the conversion analysis the researchers were able to show that 4 of 16 missense changes resulted in exon skipping in transcripts and that 17 of 22 putative splice site mutations affected splicing or mRNA transcript stability.

Analysis provided an increase of 56% in the diagnostic yield of genetic testing compared with genomic DNA sequencing alone.

Dr Casey commented, "The data confirm the heterogeneity of mismatch repair mutations and reveal that many mutations in colorectal cancer cases would be missed using conventional genomic DNA sequencing alone."

"Conversion analysis substantially increases the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for mismatch repair mutations in patients diagnosed as having colorectal cancer."

JAMA; 2005: 293 (7): 799-809.
18 February 2005

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 18 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 17 May 2018 
IBD and later extraintestinal manifestations
 17 May 2018 
Repeat stool DNA testing
 17 May 2018 
IBS and chronic fatigue following GI infection
 16 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 16 May 2018 
Diagnostic delay in Crohn's disease
 16 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 15 May 2018 
Guidelines for management of Crohn's
 15 May 2018 
Hep B in the Grey Zone
 15 May 2018 
New therapies for CDI
 14 May 2018 
Blood test for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH
 14 May 2018 
Outcomes at bariatric centers of excellence
 14 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s
 11 May 2018 
Detection of undiagnosed celiac disease
 11 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and drug-induced liver injury
 11 May 2018 
Depressive symptoms in IBD youth
 10 May 2018 
Post‐operative complications in elderly IBD
 10 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening
 10 May 2018 
Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
 09 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence
 09 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 09 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 07 May 2018 
Omitting antibiotics in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 07 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps
 04 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 04 May 2018 
National Institutes of Health workshop and obesity
 04 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening and ethnic inequities
 03 May 2018 
Gastrointestinal ultrasound in IBD
 03 May 2018 
PPI use and cognitive decline
 03 May 2018 
Ultransonography in postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's
 02 May 2018 
Symptom assessment in cirrhotic ascites
 02 May 2018 
Hep C antiviral treatment and liver cancer risk
 02 May 2018 
Chronic Hep B
 01 May 2018 
European guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
 01 May 2018 
Interferon‐free regimens in Hep C
 01 May 2018 
Age at IBD onset and extraintestinal complications
 30 April 2018 
Formula for preterm infants
 30 April 2018 
Primary antibiotic resistance and sequential therapy for H. pylori
 30 April 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measures in IBD trials
 27 April 2018 
Anxiety scale for chronic esophageal disease
 27 April 2018 
Disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis
 27 April 2018 
Eastern and western practices for endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 26 April 2018 
Obesity and physical activity in diverticulosis
 26 April 2018 
Fecal incontinence and quality of life in IBD
 26 April 2018 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis in the USA
 25 April 2018 
Aspirin and pancreatic cancer
 25 April 2018 
Central mediators of irinotecan-induced steatohepatitis
 25 April 2018 
Neuroimaging in Hep C
 24 April 2018 
Scoring system identifies cancer risk in Barrett's
 24 April 2018 
Microbiome in athletes vs sedentary subjects
 24 April 2018 
PPI and risk of stroke
 23 April 2018 
Genome-wide study on HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure
 23 April 2018 
Antibody suitable for further clinical development to complement existing therapeutic strategies for HCV
 23 April 2018 
Sleep deprivation and NAFLD in the USA
 20 April 2018 
Two annexin A11 epitopes targeted by IgG1 and IgG4 autoantibodies were shared between patients with IAC/AIP and IgG4 antibodies blocked binding of IgG1 antibodies to the shared annexin A11 epitopes
 20 April 2018 
Adalimumab with azathioprine in Crohn's
 20 April 2018 
Worldwide H.pylori prevalence
 19 April 2018 
c-Myc expression and pancreatic cancer
 19 April 2018 
Olmesartan prescription in the USA

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us