Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 16 January 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Colonoscopy simulator learning in the absence of any feedback

In the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator, reports the most recent issue of Surgical Endoscopy.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Working on a colonoscopy simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure.

Researchers from Middlesex, England investigated the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback.

The researchers hoped that this could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided.

There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from 1st attempt to the 5th in the absence of feedback
Surgical Endoscopy

The research group asked candidates to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator using Modules 3 and 4 at random.

In total, the researchers asked each candidate to perform 5 consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module.

The 5 episodes were collectively referred to as 1 trial.

The group used a time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) to denote perforation.

The researchers gave the candidates no guidance or feedback before, during, or after each procedure.

The research team recruited a total of 26 postgraduate doctors, including 9 research fellows, 5 preregistration house officers, 6 specialist registrars, and 6 consultants.

14 candidates had 5 attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes).

Another 12 candidates recorded 5 attempts (i.e., one trial each) on 2 modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes).

In total, the researchers had recorded 190 episodes, representing 38 trials.

The research group found that there was no improvement in performance on the simulator from 1st attempt to the 5th in the absence of feedback.

If the researchers noted any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning.

The outcomes that the researchers measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used.

Dr Mahmood, speaking on behalf of the research team concluded, "This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator."

"Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine."

He added, "The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator."

Surgical Endoscopy; 2004: 18 (8): 1224-1230
18 October 2004

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 16 January 2018 
Bundle of care in GI cancer surgery
 16 January 2018 
Anxiety about colonoscopy
 16 January 2018 
Thiopurines and colorectal neoplasia in IBD
 15 January 2018 
Risks of death after liver transplants for liver cancer
 15 January 2018 
Recent advances in hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 January 2018 
Ileostomy output using telemedicine
 12 January 2018 
Surveillance protocols after colorectal cancer resection
 12 January 2018 
Biologic therapy by pregnant women with IBD and infant vaccines
 12 January 2018 
Biologic therapies for IBD in the USA
 11 January 2018 
Genetic risk factors in GERD
 11 January 2018 
Predictor of colorectal adenoma
 11 January 2018 
Ectopic pregnancy in IBD 
 10 January 2018 
Fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening
 10 January 2018 
Risk factors for advanced NAFLD
 10 January 2018 
Dyspepsia prevalence with gastroesophageal reflux–type symptoms
 09 January 2018 
Screening intervals for people with family histories of colorectal cancer
 09 January 2018 
Financial impact of colorectal cancer
 09 January 2018 
Current practice and future research in autoimmune hepatitis
 08 January 2018 
Improving prognosis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
 08 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 08 January 2018 
Aprepitant and nausea with gastroparesis
 05 January 2018 
Autoimmune pancreatitis and IBD
 05 January 2018 
Primary nonresponse to infliximab therapy
 05 January 2018 
Anesthesia assistance in outpatient colonoscopy
 04 January 2018 
Dietary polyphenols in the etiology of IBD
 04 January 2018 
Yoga vs low-FODMAP in IBS
 04 January 2018 
Local esophageal food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 03 January 2018 
Population health management for IBD
 03 January 2018 
GERD in asthma and COPD
 03 January 2018 
Critical research gaps in colorectal cancer
 22 December 2017 
Costs of extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 22 December 2017 
Cholera vaccine and risk of death in colorectal cancer
 22 December 2017 
Colonoscopy after colorectal cancer resection
 21 December 2017 
Human oral microbiome and pancreatic cancer risk
 21 December 2017 
Health management for IBD
 21 December 2017 
PPI and Alzheimer's disease
 20 December 2017 
Incidence of biopsy-verified celiac disease
 20 December 2017 
Osteoporotic fractures in Barrett's esophagus
 20 December 2017 
Management of abnormal liver blood tests
 19 December 2017 
Family burden of pediatric Crohn's in the USA
 19 December 2017 
Alcohol abstinence and alcoholic hepatitis
 19 December 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 18 December 2017 
Colorectal cancer mortality with low-risk adenomas at colonoscopy
 18 December 2017 
Disease activity indices in celiac disease
 18 December 2017 
Smoking behaviour predicted the risk of surgery in Crohn's
 15 December 2017 
Molecular classification of Crohn's disease
 15 December 2017 
Medical cannabinoid legalization policy and vomiting
 15 December 2017 
Inflammatory diet pattern and colorectal cancer risk
 14 December 2017 
PPIs and gastric cancer after H.pylori eradication
 14 December 2017 
H. pylori eradication therapies in countries with clarithromycin resistance
 13 December 2017 
Disease severity in NAFLD
 13 December 2017 
Tryptophan metabolism and IBD activity
 12 December 2017 
Risk factors in undiagnosed cirrhosis
 12 December 2017 
Monitored anesthesia care for outpatient GI endoscopy
 12 December 2017 
High-risk colorectal cancer patients
 06 December 2017 
Reflux-induced chronic cough 
 06 December 2017 
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in acute-on-chronic liver failure
 06 December 2017 
Preventing hepatic encephalopathy-related readmissions
 05 December 2017 
Thiopurines and colorectal cancer in IBD
 05 December 2017 
Childhood obesity into adulthood

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us