Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 06 May 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Transnasal diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy appears to be a promising alternative to peroral upper endoscopy

Transnasal small-caliber upper endoscopy was well tolerated and safe, and is associated with less gagging than peroral endoscopy, according to a study in Endoscopy.

News image

A study published in the August issue of Endoscopy has compared the feasibility and tolerance of transnasal small-caliber and peroral small-caliber upper endoscopy with conventional peroral endoscopy.

A team of doctors in Dusseldorf, Germany, allocated 150 patients, referred for diagnostic endoscopy, to undergo either transnasal small-caliber endoscopy, peroral small-caliber endoscopy or conventional peroral endoscopy.

Complete examination, including the second part of the duodenum and biopsy sampling, was possible in all 150 patients.

Patients examined with a small-caliber instrument required sedation significantly less often than those examined with a conventional endoscope.

Transnasal endoscopy was initially more painful on insertion, but caused less gagging than the peroral procedure.

Patients examined with an ultrathin instrument required sedation significantly less often and consequently spent less time in the recovery room.
Endoscopy
4 out of 50 patients were unable to undergo transnasal endoscopy because of a narrow nasal tract. These patients instead underwent a peroral procedure.

The authors of the study conclude. “Transnasal diagnostic endoscopy appearsto be a promising alternative to peroral endoscopy.”

“Procedures with small-caliber endoscopes were better tolerated and required sedation less often than those with conventional endoscopes.”

Endoscopy 2003; 641-646
22 August 2003

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 06 May 2016 
Managing acute lower GI bleeding
 06 May 2016 
Recurrent pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis
 06 May 2016 
Risk factors in peptic ulcer bleeding
 05 May 2016 
Genetics in early-early-onset IBD
 05 May 2016 
Reductions in quality of screening colonoscopies
 05 May 2016 
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer
 04 May 2016 
Bismuth and H. pylori eradication
 04 May 2016 
Chromoendoscopy vs colonoscopy for dysplasia in colitis
 04 May 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 03 May 2016 
Surgery vs medical therapy for GERD
 03 May 2016 
Vedolizumab for IBD
 03 May 2016 
PPIs and gut microbiota
 02 May 2016 
Resection of colorectal polyps
 02 May 2016 
Genetic variant that increase NAFLD risk
 02 May 2016 
Mycophenolate mofetil as first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis
 29 April 2016 
Crohn's disease associated genes
 29 April 2016 
Simvastatins and survival in cirrhosis
 29 April 2016 
HCV infection in Baby Boomers with Medicare
 28 April 2016 
Racial disparities in survival from colon cancer
 28 April 2016 
Diarrheal diseases in children
 28 April 2016 
Birth outcomes in women with IBD receiving assisted reproduction
 27 April 2016 
Dust mite and human GI tract
 27 April 2016 
Ultra-short celiac disease
 27 April 2016 
Celiac disease in adults
 26 April 2016 
Polyp detection during colonoscopy
 26 April 2016 
Guidelines for nutrition therapy in hospitalized patients
 26 April 2016 
IBS and microscopic colitis
 25 April 2016 
Estrogen deficiency and fibrosis risk in women with NAFLD
 25 April 2016 
Abrupt interruption of beta-blockers in cirrhosis 
 25 April 2016 
Acceptance of Liver transplant center organ offers
 22 April 2016 
Novel method to regenerate the esophagus
 22 April 2016 
Relapse after antiviral treatment in Hep B
 22 April 2016 
Microscopic colitis with NSAIDs and PPIs
 11 April 2016 
Infliximab vs adalimumab in ulcerative colitis
 11 April 2016 
H. pylori in treatment-naïve children
 11 April 2016 
Admissions times and outcomes for ERCP cholangitis
 08 April 2016 
Endoscopic treatment of Crohn's strictures
 08 April 2016 
Nutrition therapy in the hospitalized patient
 08 April 2016 
H.pylori effects on pediatric gastric mucosa
 07 April 2016 
CVD changes after TIPSS
 07 April 2016 
Transanal mesorectal resection for rectal cancer
 07 April 2016 
HBV during immunosuppressive therapies
 06 April 2016 
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening strategies
 06 April 2016 
Duodenal bulb biopsies in childhood celiac disease diagnosis
 06 April 2016 
Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer
 05 April 2016 
Colorectal cancer risk with serrated polyps
 05 April 2016 
IBS in the US military
 05 April 2016 
Changes in blood flow in cirrhosis
 04 April 2016 
Noninvasive diagnosis of celiac disease
 04 April 2016 
Metallic vs plastic stents for benign biliary strictures
 04 April 2016 
Adherence to quality indicators improves clinical outcomes in ascites
 01 April 2016 
Intensive enteral nutrition and severe alcoholic hepatitis
 01 April 2016 
Prognosis after colorectal cancer resection with peritoneal metastasis
 01 April 2016 
Colorectal cancer risk with non-malignant colonoscopy findings
 31 March 2016 
Management of Barrett’s esophagus
 31 March 2016 
Anesthesia services during colonoscopy
 31 March 2016 
Alcohol and glucose tolerance in NAFLD
 30 March 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 30 March 2016 
Gastric cancer screening
 30 March 2016 
Depression and symptoms in IBS

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us