Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 23 June 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Natural history of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection

Researchers from England and France find that demographic features account for a minority of fibrosis rate variability.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

The rate of development of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection varies between individuals.

In this study, researchers determined whether fibrosis progresses linearly through the grading scales. They also identified factors influencing the rate of fibrosis.

The team’s findings are published in the April issue of Gut.

The researchers identified 917 HCV infected patients, who had undergone at least 1 liver biopsy.

They scored the biopsies were scored using the modified HAI (Ishak) and METAVIR systems. These 2 systems were compared.

Male sex, older age at infection, and viral genotype are associated with more rapid fibrosis progression.
Gut

All patients were treatment naïve at first biopsy.

Researchers examined demographic features for their relationship to fibrosis rate using univariate and multivariate analysis.

In addition, a subgroup of patients who had 2 biopsies was examined to test the assumption that fibrosis progresses in a linear fashion.

The research team found that male sex, older age at infection, and viral genotype non-1 were all associated with a rapid rate of fibrosis. Using multiple linear regression, they determined that these factors accounted for 30% of the variability in fibrosis rate.

The team also found that the METAVIR and Ishak scores were highly correlated.

However, in the 137 patients who had 2 biopsies, the predicted probability for an increase of 1 on the fibrosis score was too low to assess linearity.

Dr Wright’s team concluded, “Demographic features account for a minority of fibrosis rate variability”.

“The Ishak and METAVIR scoring systems are equivalent.”

“Linearity of fibrosis progression cannot be assessed in biopsies only a few years apart.”

Gut 2003; 52: 574-9
13 March 2003

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 23 June 2017 
Treatment for KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer
 23 June 2017 
Epidemiology of Hep E
 23 June 2017 
Predictive model for clinical course of Crohn's disease
 22 June 2017 
Vonoprazan-based triple therapy on H. pylori eradication
 22 June 2017 
Adolescent transition in IBD
 22 June 2017 
Patient understanding of biologic therapy in IBD
 21 June 2017 
Hydrolyzed wheat flour improves immunogenicity in celiac disease
 21 June 2017 
Statins in chronic Hep C
 21 June 2017 
Racial disparities in colorectal cancer
 20 June 2017 
Therapies in chronic pancreatitis
 20 June 2017 
Genetic analyses for malignancy detection in biliary strictures
 20 June 2017 
Viral-associated esophagus cancers
 19 June 2017 
Global prevalence of IBS in adults
 19 June 2017 
Clinical improvement in mild acute pancreatitis
 19 June 2017 
Repeat biopsy and celiac disease outcomes 
 16 June 2017 
Exercise-induced GI syndrome—implications for intestinal disease
 16 June 2017 
HCV among reproductive-aged women and children in the USA
 16 June 2017 
Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy
 15 June 2017 
Pioglitazone for NASH
 15 June 2017 
Urinary adverse events after rectal cancer treatment
 15 June 2017 
Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis
 14 June 2017 
Genetics of familial colorectal cancer
 14 June 2017 
Abdominal ultrasound in blunt torso trauma
 14 June 2017 
Acute kidney injury in Hep C and sofosbuvir-based regimens
 13 June 2017 
Serrated polyps in the colon and rectum
 13 June 2017 
Colorectal cancer during pregnancy
 13 June 2017 
Biomarker for penetrating Crohn's
 12 June 2017 
Course of primary sclerosing cholangitis
 12 June 2017 
Quality of life in end-stage liver disease
 12 June 2017 
Clinical remission in patients with Crohn's disease
 09 June 2017 
Socioeconomic influences on H. pylori gastritis
 09 June 2017 
Celiac disease in Ireland
 09 June 2017 
Consultants do not follow up on GI tests they recommend
 08 June 2017 
Genetics and the gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome
 08 June 2017 
Antireflux surgery in extraesophageal reflux
 08 June 2017 
Breath testing in gastrointestinal disorders
 07 June 2017 
Multidisciplinary care and liver cancer
 07 June 2017 
Model for excluding NAFLD
 07 June 2017 
Hospital readmission in IBD
 06 June 2017 
Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk
 06 June 2017 
Direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV
 06 June 2017 
Medical therapies for stricturing Crohn’s
 05 June 2017 
Celiac disease prevalence in the USA
 05 June 2017 
Hospital-acquired conditions in Crohn’s disease
 05 June 2017 
Depression and IBD
 02 June 2017 
Menopausal hormone therapy and fecal incontinence
 02 June 2017 
Narcotic and corticosteroid prescriptions in IBD
 02 June 2017 
Treating anemia after gastrectomy
 01 June 2017 
Infliximab and cancer in pediatric IBD
 01 June 2017 
Health insurance policies in IBD
 01 June 2017 
Endoscopic quality improvement program for polyp detection
 31 May 2017 
Probiotics and Clostridium difficile infection
 31 May 2017 
Post-procedural adverse events after colonoscopy
 31 May 2017 
Clinical decision-making in severe alcoholic hepatitis
 30 May 2017 
Waist belts and reflux
 30 May 2017 
Colorectal cancer increases in developed and developing regions
 30 May 2017 
Antidepressants and bleeding in peptic ulcers
 26 May 2017 
Accreditation program for rectal cancer
 26 May 2017 
Risk of lower GI bleeds with aspirin
 26 May 2017 
Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in high-risk patients

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us