Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 May 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Natural history of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection

Researchers from England and France find that demographic features account for a minority of fibrosis rate variability.

News image

The rate of development of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection varies between individuals.

In this study, researchers determined whether fibrosis progresses linearly through the grading scales. They also identified factors influencing the rate of fibrosis.

The team’s findings are published in the April issue of Gut.

The researchers identified 917 HCV infected patients, who had undergone at least 1 liver biopsy.

They scored the biopsies were scored using the modified HAI (Ishak) and METAVIR systems. These 2 systems were compared.

Male sex, older age at infection, and viral genotype are associated with more rapid fibrosis progression.
Gut

All patients were treatment naïve at first biopsy.

Researchers examined demographic features for their relationship to fibrosis rate using univariate and multivariate analysis.

In addition, a subgroup of patients who had 2 biopsies was examined to test the assumption that fibrosis progresses in a linear fashion.

The research team found that male sex, older age at infection, and viral genotype non-1 were all associated with a rapid rate of fibrosis. Using multiple linear regression, they determined that these factors accounted for 30% of the variability in fibrosis rate.

The team also found that the METAVIR and Ishak scores were highly correlated.

However, in the 137 patients who had 2 biopsies, the predicted probability for an increase of 1 on the fibrosis score was too low to assess linearity.

Dr Wright’s team concluded, “Demographic features account for a minority of fibrosis rate variability”.

“The Ishak and METAVIR scoring systems are equivalent.”

“Linearity of fibrosis progression cannot be assessed in biopsies only a few years apart.”

Gut 2003; 52: 574-9
13 March 2003

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 May 2016 
New therapies for NASH
 24 May 2016 
Fecal inflammatory markers in Crohn's
 24 May 2016 
Depression and IBD recurrence
 23 May 2016 
Cancer after colectomy in IBD
 23 May 2016 
Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding outcomes
 23 May 2016 
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
 20 May 2016 
Prognostic score for hepatic venous outflow obstruction
 20 May 2016 
Treatment for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 20 May 2016 
Biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis
 19 May 2016 
Probiotics and H. pylori eradication
 19 May 2016 
Impaired skeletal health in atrophic gastritis
 19 May 2016 
Predicting outcome in ulcerative colitis
 18 May 2016 
Erectile dysfunction in IBD
 18 May 2016 
Acute GERD and esophageal histologic changes
 18 May 2016 
Surgical fundoplication for GERD 
 17 May 2016 
Mucosal dysbiosis in Crohn's disease
 17 May 2016 
Vitamin D level and clinical status in IBD 
 17 May 2016 
Inpatient costs for IBD and acute pancreatitis
 16 May 2016 
Outcomes of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers
 16 May 2016 
C. difficile in ulcerative colitis patients
 16 May 2016 
Therapy for Crohn's in a Medicaid population
 13 May 2016 
Parkinson's disease and IBD
 13 May 2016 
Non-traditional heart disease risk factors in NAFLD
 13 May 2016 
Inactivated oral cholera vaccine
 12 May 2016 
Gestational diabetes mellitus and NAFLD
 12 May 2016 
Impact of Crohn's in the USA
 12 May 2016 
Ozanimod induction and ulcerative colitis
 11 May 2016 
Anti-TNF discontinuation in IBD
 11 May 2016 
Age and disease presentation with Crohn's disease
 11 May 2016 
Prognosis after colorectal cancer resection
 10 May 2016 
Gluten-free diet in patients with IBS-diarrhea
 10 May 2016 
Noninvasive test for IBD
 10 May 2016 
Digital health for gastroenterology
 09 May 2016 
Diarrheal infections in adults
 09 May 2016 
Quality improvement initiative and readmission for cirrhosis
 09 May 2016 
Coffee or tea and the risk of Barrett's
 06 May 2016 
Recurrent pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis
 06 May 2016 
Risk factors in peptic ulcer bleeding
 06 May 2016 
Managing acute lower GI bleeding
 05 May 2016 
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer
 05 May 2016 
Genetics in early-early-onset IBD
 05 May 2016 
Reductions in quality of screening colonoscopies
 04 May 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 04 May 2016 
Bismuth and H. pylori eradication
 04 May 2016 
Chromoendoscopy vs colonoscopy for dysplasia in colitis
 03 May 2016 
Vedolizumab for IBD
 03 May 2016 
PPIs and gut microbiota
 03 May 2016 
Surgery vs medical therapy for GERD
 02 May 2016 
Mycophenolate mofetil as first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis
 02 May 2016 
Genetic variant that increase NAFLD risk
 02 May 2016 
Resection of colorectal polyps
 29 April 2016 
HCV infection in Baby Boomers with Medicare
 29 April 2016 
Simvastatins and survival in cirrhosis
 29 April 2016 
Crohn's disease associated genes
 28 April 2016 
Birth outcomes in women with IBD receiving assisted reproduction
 28 April 2016 
Racial disparities in survival from colon cancer
 28 April 2016 
Diarrheal diseases in children
 27 April 2016 
Ultra-short celiac disease
 27 April 2016 
Celiac disease in adults
 27 April 2016 
Dust mite and human GI tract

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us