Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 20 November 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation

Biopsy is essential in identifying donor grafts at risk for poor recipient outcome while maximizing the donor pool, find researchers in the December issue of Liver Transplantation.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Living donor liver transplantation allows patients with end-stage liver disease the opportunity for treatment, in the face of a critical shortage of cadaveric organs.

However, hepatic steatosis decreases functional graft mass and may contribute to graft dysfunction.

Screening liver biopsy allows an accurate measure of hepatic fat, but is an invasive procedure that is not universally employed in the evaluation of living donors.

BMI correlated only weakly with biopsy.
Liver Transplantation

In this study, a research team from Rochester, New York, studied 100 consecutive prospective right lobe living donors.

All prospective donors were evaluated using liver biopsy, imaging studies, and various clinical parameters.

The team then compared body mass index (BMI) and imaging with biopsy, to determine their accuracy in determining the amount of hepatic fat.

The researchers found no complications to biopsy, with 33% showing some degree of steatosis.

However, they also found that BMI correlated weakly with biopsy, with 73% of overweight (BMI > 25) donors having little or no hepatic fat.

Furthermore, imaging was only 12% sensitive to small amounts of fat, with increasing sensitivity to more severe steatosis.

In addition, imaging diagnosed steatosis in 2 donors without hepatic fat and failed to identify a candidate denied with biopsy-proven 30% steatosis.

Conversely, 9% of candidates with BMIs of 25 or less had 10% or greater steatosis, while 3 candidates were denied surgery because biopsy detected occult liver disease.

Dr Charlotte Ryan's team concluded, "Accurate quantification of hepatic fat is not afforded by BMI and imaging studies alone".

"Screening liver biopsy has a low complication rate and may serve to increase donor safety".

"Biopsy is essential in identifying donor grafts at risk for poor recipient outcome while maximizing the donor pool".

In a related article in the same publication, Drs Mary Rinella and Michael Abecassis, from Chicago, Illinios, debate the issues involved in selecting suitable liver donors.

They discuss the issues raised in the above article, concluding that, "Potential candidates who are obese should undergo hepatic tissue sampling".

However, "Liver biopsy is one of many diagnostic tools used to evaluate potential donors and should be used judiciously, weighing all other data available".

Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 1114-22
09 December 2002

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 20 November 2017 
Barriers to hepatitis C treatment
 20 November 2017 
Socioeconomic characteristics in diverticular disease
 20 November 2017 
Endoscopic indices of disease activity for Crohn’s
 17 November 2017 
Food elimination diets for treatment of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
 17 November 2017 
PPI use and cognitive function in women
 17 November 2017 
Predicting microscopic colitis
 16 November 2017 
NAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma and survival after orthotopic liver transplant
 16 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and severe maternal morbidity
 16 November 2017 
Celiac disease screening in adult first-degree relatives
 15 November 2017 
Breastfeeding and the risk of IBD
 15 November 2017 
Medication nonadherence and health care costs
 15 November 2017 
Predicting recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
HBV/HCV coinfection and cirrhosis
 14 November 2017 
Sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery
 14 November 2017 
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis
 13 November 2017 
GI bleeding in patients taking non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
 13 November 2017 
Genetic polymorphisms, fatty acids and ulcerative colitis
 13 November 2017 
Flares after immunomodulator withdrawal in Crohn's
 10 November 2017 
Thiopurines vs TNF and lymphoma risk in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer
 09 November 2017 
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
 09 November 2017 
Irradiated rectal cancer and chemoradiotherapy
 09 November 2017 
Environmental factors and IBD
 08 November 2017 
Prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 08 November 2017 
Optimal management of postoperative Crohn's disease
 07 November 2017 
Community Screening for Helicobacter pylori
 07 November 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 07 November 2017 
Mesocolic excision for colon cancer
 06 November 2017 
Food elimination diet for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 November 2017 
Biologic agents and obesity in children with IBD
 06 November 2017 
Liver cancer burden despite extensive use of antiviral agents
 03 November 2017 
Statins and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis
 03 November 2017 
Propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
 03 November 2017 
Asthma and IBD development
 02 November 2017 
Diverticulitis and emergency department burden
 02 November 2017 
Sexual functioning in Hep C
 02 November 2017 
Rural residence and risk of IBD
 01 November 2017 
Heartburn relief in adolescents with GERD
 01 November 2017 
Autoimmune pancreatitis in children
 31 October 2017 
Follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests
 31 October 2017 
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
 30 October 2017 
Local recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 30 October 2017 
Low-flow ascites pump in refractory cirrhosis
 30 October 2017 
Medical therapy of patients with pediatric-onset IBD
 27 October 2017 
NAFLD in advanced fibrosis in the USA
 27 October 2017 
Early readmission in cirrhosis after bacterial infections
 26 October 2017 
Predicting response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's
 26 October 2017 
Conversion to open laparotomy in rectal cancer
 25 October 2017 
Conversion of colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 25 October 2017 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 25 October 2017 
Rifaximin and survival in hepatic encephalopathy
 24 October 2017 
Eosinophilic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids
 24 October 2017 
Meta-analysis in nutritiona research
 23 October 2017 
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma in liver resection
 23 October 2017 
Outcome of hepatic sarcoidosis
 20 October 2017 
Conversion of planned colonoscopy to sigmoidoscopy
 20 October 2017 
Hospital readmissions reduction program
 19 October 2017 
Surgical anastomosis at 1-year colorectal cancer surveillance
 19 October 2017 
Fecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us