Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 19 January 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation

Biopsy is essential in identifying donor grafts at risk for poor recipient outcome while maximizing the donor pool, find researchers in the December issue of Liver Transplantation.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Living donor liver transplantation allows patients with end-stage liver disease the opportunity for treatment, in the face of a critical shortage of cadaveric organs.

However, hepatic steatosis decreases functional graft mass and may contribute to graft dysfunction.

Screening liver biopsy allows an accurate measure of hepatic fat, but is an invasive procedure that is not universally employed in the evaluation of living donors.

BMI correlated only weakly with biopsy.
Liver Transplantation

In this study, a research team from Rochester, New York, studied 100 consecutive prospective right lobe living donors.

All prospective donors were evaluated using liver biopsy, imaging studies, and various clinical parameters.

The team then compared body mass index (BMI) and imaging with biopsy, to determine their accuracy in determining the amount of hepatic fat.

The researchers found no complications to biopsy, with 33% showing some degree of steatosis.

However, they also found that BMI correlated weakly with biopsy, with 73% of overweight (BMI > 25) donors having little or no hepatic fat.

Furthermore, imaging was only 12% sensitive to small amounts of fat, with increasing sensitivity to more severe steatosis.

In addition, imaging diagnosed steatosis in 2 donors without hepatic fat and failed to identify a candidate denied with biopsy-proven 30% steatosis.

Conversely, 9% of candidates with BMIs of 25 or less had 10% or greater steatosis, while 3 candidates were denied surgery because biopsy detected occult liver disease.

Dr Charlotte Ryan's team concluded, "Accurate quantification of hepatic fat is not afforded by BMI and imaging studies alone".

"Screening liver biopsy has a low complication rate and may serve to increase donor safety".

"Biopsy is essential in identifying donor grafts at risk for poor recipient outcome while maximizing the donor pool".

In a related article in the same publication, Drs Mary Rinella and Michael Abecassis, from Chicago, Illinios, debate the issues involved in selecting suitable liver donors.

They discuss the issues raised in the above article, concluding that, "Potential candidates who are obese should undergo hepatic tissue sampling".

However, "Liver biopsy is one of many diagnostic tools used to evaluate potential donors and should be used judiciously, weighing all other data available".

Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 1114-22
09 December 2002

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 19 January 2018 
Ileoanal pouch microbiota
 19 January 2018 
Predicting the risk of early surgery in Crohn’s
 19 January 2018 
Lifestyle intervention vs gastric bypass for obesity and diabetes
 18 January 2018 
Sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
 18 January 2018 
Healthcare costs of liver cancer in the USA
 18 January 2018 
High-risk adenomas at colonoscopy
 17 January 2018 
“Weekend effect” in upper GI hemorrhage
 17 January 2018 
Gut dysbiosis and non-antibiotic prescription medications
 17 January 2018 
Reducing surgical infections in high-outlier colorectal unit
 16 January 2018 
Bundle of care in GI cancer surgery
 16 January 2018 
Anxiety about colonoscopy
 16 January 2018 
Thiopurines and colorectal neoplasia in IBD
 15 January 2018 
Risks of death after liver transplants for liver cancer
 15 January 2018 
Recent advances in hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 January 2018 
Ileostomy output using telemedicine
 12 January 2018 
Surveillance protocols after colorectal cancer resection
 12 January 2018 
Biologic therapy by pregnant women with IBD and infant vaccines
 12 January 2018 
Biologic therapies for IBD in the USA
 11 January 2018 
Genetic risk factors in GERD
 11 January 2018 
Predictor of colorectal adenoma
 11 January 2018 
Ectopic pregnancy in IBD 
 10 January 2018 
Fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening
 10 January 2018 
Risk factors for advanced NAFLD
 10 January 2018 
Dyspepsia prevalence with gastroesophageal reflux–type symptoms
 09 January 2018 
Screening intervals for people with family histories of colorectal cancer
 09 January 2018 
Financial impact of colorectal cancer
 09 January 2018 
Current practice and future research in autoimmune hepatitis
 08 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 08 January 2018 
Improving prognosis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
 08 January 2018 
Aprepitant and nausea with gastroparesis
 05 January 2018 
Autoimmune pancreatitis and IBD
 05 January 2018 
Primary nonresponse to infliximab therapy
 05 January 2018 
Anesthesia assistance in outpatient colonoscopy
 04 January 2018 
Dietary polyphenols in the etiology of IBD
 04 January 2018 
Yoga vs low-FODMAP in IBS
 04 January 2018 
Local esophageal food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 03 January 2018 
Population health management for IBD
 03 January 2018 
GERD in asthma and COPD
 03 January 2018 
Critical research gaps in colorectal cancer
 22 December 2017 
Costs of extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 22 December 2017 
Cholera vaccine and risk of death in colorectal cancer
 22 December 2017 
Colonoscopy after colorectal cancer resection
 21 December 2017 
Human oral microbiome and pancreatic cancer risk
 21 December 2017 
Health management for IBD
 21 December 2017 
PPI and Alzheimer's disease
 20 December 2017 
Management of abnormal liver blood tests
 20 December 2017 
Incidence of biopsy-verified celiac disease
 20 December 2017 
Osteoporotic fractures in Barrett's esophagus
 19 December 2017 
Alcohol abstinence and alcoholic hepatitis
 19 December 2017 
Family burden of pediatric Crohn's in the USA
 19 December 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 18 December 2017 
Colorectal cancer mortality with low-risk adenomas at colonoscopy
 18 December 2017 
Disease activity indices in celiac disease
 18 December 2017 
Smoking behaviour predicted the risk of surgery in Crohn's
 15 December 2017 
Molecular classification of Crohn's disease
 15 December 2017 
Medical cannabinoid legalization policy and vomiting
 15 December 2017 
Inflammatory diet pattern and colorectal cancer risk
 14 December 2017 
PPIs and gastric cancer after H.pylori eradication
 14 December 2017 
H. pylori eradication therapies in countries with clarithromycin resistance
 13 December 2017 
Disease severity in NAFLD

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us