Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 May 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Predicting which patients can undergo upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation

Increasing age and decreased pharyngeal sensitivity are the only independent predictors of a satisfactory upper endoscopy, finds a Canadian study investigating factors useful in predicting the success of unsedated diagnostic upper endoscopies.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

Elimination of the necessity for conscious sedation in diagnostic endoscopy procedures has advantages both in terms of patient safety and also in reducing costs.

A study in the August issue of the journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has therefore examined whether independent predictors of a comfortable, technically adequate, unsedated diagnostic upper endoscopy can be identified and validated.

The study, carried out on patients in Canada, involved an initial 268 subjects enrolled in a prospective manner.

Data such as demographics, use of sedatives or analgesics, upper endoscopy experience, technical adequacy and pharyngeal sensitivity were collected from each subject.

In addition, each patient completed a validated anxiety questionnaire and carried out an assessment of comfort after the procedure.

The main outcome measure of the survey was "satisfactory upper endoscopy", a composite of optimal scores for patient comfort and technical adequacy.

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the optimal predictive model of a satisfactory unsedated diagnostic upper endoscopy.

Once identified, a further 68 patients were enrolled to the study in a similar fashion from an independent prospective sample, for purposes of outcome validation.

Multivariate analysis was then repeated with the total cohort (n = 336) and these results were compared for concordance with those obtained from the initial cohort.

Among the initial 268 patients (54.3% women, mean age 51 ± 17 years), a total of 49% were found to be anxious, while 15% regularly used sedatives and analgesics, 28% experienced pharyngeal sensitivity and 41% had previously undergone upper endoscopy.

Endoscopy was completed in slightly fewer than 95% of patients without sedation, and was technically adequate in 97%.

Unsedated upper endoscopy:
Only modest numbers of patients suitable
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

80% of patients said they would be willing to repeat the procedure under similar conditions.

However, satisfactory upper endoscopy was achieved in only 59% of the initial cohort.

The only independent and significant predictors of a satisfactory upper endoscopy were advancing age and decreased pharyngeal sensitivity.

A satisfactory endoscopy was achieved in only 59.5% of the total cohort (n = 336), while only 61% reported a comfortable procedural experience.

Commenting on the findings, Dr Neena Abraham, one of the report authors', said, "The proportion of patients who can undergo technically adequate unsedated upper endoscopy is modest."

"Unsedated upper endoscopy is most likely to be successful under these procedural conditions in patients of advancing age with decreased pharyngeal sensitivity."

Although cautioning as to the generalizability of these current findings to an American population, Dr Abraham said that further study may assist in identifying a subgroup of patients in whom it is cost-effective to perform upper endoscopy comfortably without sedation.

Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(2): 180-189
06 August 2002

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 May 2018 
Precision medicine for tumors
 24 May 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measures in IBD trials
 24 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and outcomes in drug-induced liver injury
 23 May 2018 
High body mass index is and ulcerative colitis
 23 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease
 23 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 22 May 2018 
Worldwide H.pylori prevalence
 22 May 2018 
PPI and risk of stroke
 22 May 2018 
Online tool predicts bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection
 21 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence and quality of life in IBD
 21 May 2018 
PPI use and cognitive decline
 21 May 2018 
Depressive symptoms in IBD youth
 18 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 17 May 2018 
IBD and later extraintestinal manifestations
 17 May 2018 
Repeat stool DNA testing
 17 May 2018 
IBS and chronic fatigue following GI infection
 16 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 16 May 2018 
Diagnostic delay in Crohn's disease
 16 May 2018 
Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with NAFLD
 15 May 2018 
Guidelines for management of Crohn's
 15 May 2018 
New therapies for CDI
 15 May 2018 
Hep B in the Grey Zone
 14 May 2018 
Blood test for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH
 14 May 2018 
Outcomes at bariatric centers of excellence
 14 May 2018 
Management of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s
 11 May 2018 
Detection of undiagnosed celiac disease
 11 May 2018 
Alcohol consumption and drug-induced liver injury
 10 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening
 10 May 2018 
Post‐operative complications in elderly IBD
 10 May 2018 
Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B
 09 May 2018 
Esophageal dilatation in clinical practice 
 09 May 2018 
Fecal incontinence
 09 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Omitting antibiotics in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 07 May 2018 
Health problems and IBS
 07 May 2018 
Assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps
 04 May 2018 
Factors associated with fecal incontinence
 04 May 2018 
National Institutes of Health workshop and obesity
 04 May 2018 
Colorectal cancer screening and ethnic inequities
 03 May 2018 
Gastrointestinal ultrasound in IBD
 03 May 2018 
Ultransonography in postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's
 02 May 2018 
Hep C antiviral treatment and liver cancer risk
 02 May 2018 
Symptom assessment in cirrhotic ascites
 02 May 2018 
Chronic Hep B
 01 May 2018 
European guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
 01 May 2018 
Interferon‐free regimens in Hep C
 01 May 2018 
Age at IBD onset and extraintestinal complications
 30 April 2018 
Formula for preterm infants
 30 April 2018 
Primary antibiotic resistance and sequential therapy for H. pylori
 27 April 2018 
Eastern and western practices for endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 27 April 2018 
Anxiety scale for chronic esophageal disease
 27 April 2018 
Disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis
 26 April 2018 
Obesity and physical activity in diverticulosis
 26 April 2018 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis in the USA
 25 April 2018 
Aspirin and pancreatic cancer
 25 April 2018 
Central mediators of irinotecan-induced steatohepatitis
 25 April 2018 
Neuroimaging in Hep C
 24 April 2018 
Scoring system identifies cancer risk in Barrett's
 24 April 2018 
Microbiome in athletes vs sedentary subjects
 23 April 2018 
Genome-wide study on HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us