Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 November 2017

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Imperfect bowel preparation increases colonoscopy costs considerably

Imperfect bowel preparation substantially increases colonoscopy costs, according to research published in the July issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

A team from Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, measured the impact of bowel preparation on the efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

The study included 200 consecutive outpatient colonoscopies in patients with intact colons, both at a private university hospital and at a public university hospital.

The time spent suctioning fluid and feces from the colon and the time spent washing the colon to clean the mucosa were recorded.

Colonoscopists were prospectively asked to designate examinations that should be repeated at an interval sooner than would otherwise be recommended because of imperfect preparation.

A cost analysis of the economic effect of bowel preparation on direct costs of colonoscopy was also conducted.

The researchers found that suctioning fluid and washing occupied 6% and 1.5%, respectively, of total examination time (including insertion and withdrawal) at the public hospital. These figures were 9% and 1.3% at the private hospital.

Patients at the public hospital were more likely to have an aborted examination (6.5% vs 1%).

Cost increase from imperfect preparation:
University hospital: 12%
Public hospital: 22%
American Journal of Gastroenterology

They also had a greater chance of being brought back earlier than suggested or required by current practice standards because of imperfect bowel preparation (20% vs 12.5%).

Cost analysis indicated that to complete the initial examinations and the first round of surveillance, imperfect bowel preparation resulted in a 12% increase in costs at the university hospital and a 22% increase at the public hospital.

Dr Douglas K. Rex, of the Indiana University Medical Center, said on behalf of his colleagues, "The increase in colonoscopy costs associated with imperfect preparation is substantial, and seems likely to vary among practices.

"Aborted examinations and surveillance examinations performed earlier than recommended because of imperfect preparation are appropriate targets for continuous quality improvement programs," he added.

"More reliable bowel preparations, or measures to improve patient compliance with bowel preparation, could significantly reduce the costs of colonoscopy in clinical practice," he concluded.

In an accompanying Editorial, Michael F. Byrne, of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA, comments, "The study supports a widely held belief that further advances are required both in the administration of bowel preparation and in the type of preparation used.

"The present situation is not ideal. Further measures to improve patient compliance via education and improving the presentation and tolerability of the preparation are very appropriate and indeed achievable goals."

"These measures would undoubtedly translate into significant cost savings, lead to a decrease in procedure-related morbidity and mortality, and increase confidence in adoption of screening guidelines," he concludes.

Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97 (7): 1587-90, 1696-700
09 July 2002

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 November 2017 
Osteoporotic fractures in Barrett's esophagus
 24 November 2017 
Center ERCP volume and procedure success
 24 November 2017 
Adipokines and IBD
 23 November 2017 
Pharmacological management of GERD
 23 November 2017 
Incidence of biopsy-verified celiac disease
 23 November 2017 
Distance travelling for rectal cancer outcomes
 22 November 2017 
Challenges of US-trained gastroenterologists when abroad
 22 November 2017 
Surgical treatment delays influence survival in colon cancer
 22 November 2017 
Golimumab in Crohn's disease
 21 November 2017 
Preoperative optimization in IBD patients
 21 November 2017 
Cholangiopathy in critically ill patients
 21 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and maternal mortality
 20 November 2017 
Barriers to hepatitis C treatment
 20 November 2017 
Socioeconomic characteristics in diverticular disease
 20 November 2017 
Endoscopic indices of disease activity for Crohn’s
 17 November 2017 
Food elimination diets for treatment of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
 17 November 2017 
PPI use and cognitive function in women
 17 November 2017 
Predicting microscopic colitis
 16 November 2017 
NAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma and survival after orthotopic liver transplant
 16 November 2017 
Prepregnancy obesity and severe maternal morbidity
 16 November 2017 
Celiac disease screening in adult first-degree relatives
 15 November 2017 
Breastfeeding and the risk of IBD
 15 November 2017 
Predicting recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 15 November 2017 
Medication nonadherence and health care costs
 14 November 2017 
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis
 14 November 2017 
HBV/HCV coinfection and cirrhosis
 14 November 2017 
Sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery
 13 November 2017 
Genetic polymorphisms, fatty acids and ulcerative colitis
 13 November 2017 
Flares after immunomodulator withdrawal in Crohn's
 13 November 2017 
GI bleeding in patients taking non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
 10 November 2017 
Thiopurines vs TNF and lymphoma risk in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in IBD
 10 November 2017 
Treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer
 09 November 2017 
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
 09 November 2017 
Irradiated rectal cancer and chemoradiotherapy
 09 November 2017 
Environmental factors and IBD
 08 November 2017 
Prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 08 November 2017 
Optimal management of postoperative Crohn's disease
 07 November 2017 
Community Screening for Helicobacter pylori
 07 November 2017 
Early readmission in IBD patients
 07 November 2017 
Mesocolic excision for colon cancer
 06 November 2017 
Food elimination diet for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 November 2017 
Biologic agents and obesity in children with IBD
 06 November 2017 
Liver cancer burden despite extensive use of antiviral agents
 03 November 2017 
Statins and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis
 03 November 2017 
Propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
 03 November 2017 
Asthma and IBD development
 02 November 2017 
Diverticulitis and emergency department burden
 02 November 2017 
Rural residence and risk of IBD
 02 November 2017 
Sexual functioning in Hep C
 01 November 2017 
Autoimmune pancreatitis in children
 01 November 2017 
Heartburn relief in adolescents with GERD
 31 October 2017 
Follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests
 31 October 2017 
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
 30 October 2017 
Local recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery
 30 October 2017 
Low-flow ascites pump in refractory cirrhosis
 30 October 2017 
Medical therapy of patients with pediatric-onset IBD
 27 October 2017 
NAFLD in advanced fibrosis in the USA
 27 October 2017 
Early readmission in cirrhosis after bacterial infections
 26 October 2017 
Predicting response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2017 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us