Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 26 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Quality of life is high in donors after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation

Health-related quality of life in donors after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation is the same or better than the general population, finds a study reported in the current issue of Transplantation.

News image

fiogf49gjkf04

A team from New York, USA, assessed quality of life after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation.

Between 1998 and 2000, 48 adults received liver grafts from living donors.

At least 2 months after donation, donors were mailed a structured questionnaire and the standardized Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

This latter survey is a generic measure, which assesses health-related quality of life outcomes using 8 scales: mental health, emotional limits, vitality, social function, physical function, physical limits, pain, and general health.

Of the donors, 63% responded at a mean of 280 days after donation.

Donors scored higher than the general population in 7 of 8 questionnaire domains.
Transplantation

Half of their recipients had major complications (2 deaths, 4 retransplants, 9 biliary complications).

Regarding overall satisfaction, all said they would donate again.

The researchers found that, compared to published US norms (n = 2474), donors scored higher than the general population in 7 of 8 domains on the SF-36.

In addition, donors whose recipients had no complications scored significantly higher in mental health and general health compared with US norms.

On the other hand, donors whose recipients had major complications scored significantly lower on the mental health scale than those with recipients without major complications.

Leona Kim-Schluger, of the Transplantation Institute at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, said on behalf of the group, "Donors did not regret their decision to donate. In fact, several felt the experience had changed their lives for the better.

"In addition, donors scored as well as or better than US norms in general health."

"Quality of life after donation must remain a primary outcome measure when we consider the utility of living-donor liver transplants," it was concluded.

Transplantation 2002; 73 (10): 1593-7
11 June 2002

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 26 February 2018 
Metabolic effects of new therapies of NASH
 26 February 2018 
Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Hep B
 26 February 2018 
Novel targets for hepatocellular carcinoma
 23 February 2018 
Patients on antithrombotic agents undergoing emergency and elective endoscopy
 23 February 2018 
Heavy metals on a gluten-free diet
 23 February 2018 
MRI and NAFLD
 22 February 2018 
Outcomes with Crohn’s after infliximab withdrawal
 22 February 2018 
Elderly onset of IBD

 22 February 2018 
Autophagy enhancers
 21 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 21 February 2018 
Adalimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve Crohn's
 21 February 2018 
Cystic fibrosis and colorectal cancer
 20 February 2018 
Complications and surveillance colonoscopies
 20 February 2018 
Treatment algorithm for polyp cancers
 20 February 2018 
Predictors of postoperative infection in Crohn's
 19 February 2018 
Screening colonoscopy in the right and left colon
 19 February 2018 
NAFLD prevalence in the USA
 19 February 2018 
Fructans in children with IBS

 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us