Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 19 February 2018

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Social networking-based discussion group used to share ERCP-related topics

A study in the most recent issue of the European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology examines activities in a social networking-based discussion group by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography doctors.

News image

Online social networking is increasingly being used among medical practitioners.

However, few studies have evaluated its use in therapeutic endoscopy.

Dr Xiaoyua Kang and colleagues analyzed the shared topics and activities of a group of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) doctors in a social networking-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group.

The team invited 6 ERCP trainers working in Xijing Hospital, and 48 graduated endoscopists who had finished ERCP training in the same hospital to join in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group.

214 ERCP-related topics were shared
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

All group members were informed not to divulge any private information of patients when using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group.

The researchers retrospectively extracted activities of group members on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group.

The individual data of the graduated endoscopists were collected by a questionnaire.

From 2014 to 2015, 6924 messages were posted on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group, half of which were ERCP related.

In total, the team found that 214 ERCP-related topics were shared, which could be categorized into 3 types, including sharing experience/cases, asking questions, and sharing literatures/advances.

Among the 48 graduated endoscopists, the researchers observed that 21 had a low case volume of less than 50 per year, and 27 had a high volume case volume of 50 or more.

The researchers noted that high-volume graduated endoscopists posted more ERCP-related messages, and shared more discussion topics compared with low-volume graduated endoscopists.

The research team showed that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group was useful for graduated endoscopists in ERCP performance and management of post-ERCP complications.

Dr Kang's team concludes, "A wide range of ERCP-related topics were shared on the social networking-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group."

"The ERCP-related behaviors on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography discussion group were more active in graduated endoscopists with an ERCP case volume of more than 50 per year."

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017: 29(10): 1131–1135
28 September 2017

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 19 February 2018 
The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in the right colon was not significantly different from that in the left colon/rectum
 19 February 2018 
No significant differences, among racial or ethnic groups, found in patients with significant fibrosis
 19 February 2018 
Hydrogen production greater in patients on a fructan-containing diet, than those following a maltodextrin-containing diet

 16 February 2018 
Undetected celiac in the elderly
 16 February 2018 
Inflammatory bowel diseases are global diseases
 16 February 2018 
Fructans induce non-celiac gluten sensitivity
 15 February 2018 
Oral direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hep C virus genotype 1
 15 February 2018 
NSAIDS and GI damage
 15 February 2018 
Primary vs secondary surgery for the presence of lymph node metastasis
 14 February 2018 
Management of hemorrhoids in the USA
 14 February 2018 
Predicting adenoma detection rate
 14 February 2018 
Normal bowel frequency characterization in the USA 
 13 February 2018 
Prebiotics improve endothelial dysfunction
 13 February 2018 
Personalising treatment options for IBS
 13 February 2018 
Diagnostic criteria for a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders
 12 February 2018 
Visceral hypersensitivity and functional GI disorders
 12 February 2018 
Depression and aggressive IBD
 12 February 2018 
Variability in interpretation of endoscopic findings impacts patient management
 09 February 2018 
Treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture in IBD
 09 February 2018 
PRO measurement information system 
 09 February 2018 
Overall disease severity indices for IBD
 08 February 2018 
Prediction of endoscopically active disease

 08 February 2018 
Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis
 08 February 2018 
Decision aid used by IBD patients
 07 February 2018 
Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate for itching
 07 February 2018 
Change in microbiome in gastritis vs gastric carcinoma
 07 February 2018 
Colorectal cancer and primary sclerosing cholangitis-IBD
 06 February 2018 
Risk of death after liver transplantation
 06 February 2018 
Crohn’s disease vs refractory pouchitis
 06 February 2018 
Support for functional dyspepsia symptom diary
 05 February 2018 
Helicobacter spp influence on GI tract 
 05 February 2018 
No link found between severe reflux and all-cause mortality 
 05 February 2018 
Psychological distress in PPI non-responders
 02 February 2018 
Assessing psychosexual impact of IBD
 02 February 2018 
Decrease in overall mortality with cholera vaccination
 02 February 2018 
Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical tests
 01 February 2018 
Screening frequency with family histories of colorectal cancer
 01 February 2018 
IBD and sport participation
 01 February 2018 
Life with a stoma 
 31 January 2018 
Aprepitant and gastroparesis 
 31 January 2018 
Anesthesia risk in colonoscopy
 31 January 2018 
GED-0301 for Crohn's Disease
 30 January 2018 
Intestinal dysbiosis and allergic diseases in infants
 30 January 2018 
Fructans and IBS symptoms in children
 29 January 2018 
Dosing calculator for therapy optimization in IBD
 29 January 2018 
Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for in HCV
 29 January 2018 
Food allergen injections in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 January 2018 
Reliability of the IBD index
 26 January 2018 
Tofacitinib vs biological therapies for ulcerative colitis
 26 January 2018 
Optimizing selection of biologics in IBD
 26 January 2018 
Nutritional risk and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy outcomes
 25 January 2018 
Patient-reported outcome measure for functional dyspepsia
 25 January 2018 
Predicting intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery
 25 January 2018 
Predictors of gastric cancer risk
 24 January 2018 
Risk factors underlying previously undiagnosed cirrhosis
 24 January 2018 
Ethnicity influences phenotype in IBD
 24 January 2018 
Bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment
 23 January 2018 
Atrophic gastritis after H. pylori eradication
 23 January 2018 
Ectopic pregnancy in women with IBD
 23 January 2018 
Celiac disease in IBS in the USA

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2018 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us