Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 29 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Toward an evidence-based approach in diagnosing diverticulitis

The latest issue of the Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology evaluates the accuracy of the clinical evaluation and diagnostic modalities for patients with suspected acute colonic diverticulitis.

News image

The lack of pathognomonic findings and the chance of complicated disease have resulted in the widespread use of additional imaging to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis.

The added value of additional imaging in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of acute colonic diverticulitis is not well defined.

Dr Caroline Suzanne Andeweg and colleagues systematically reviewed the literature of the accuracy of the clinical evaluation and diagnostic modalities for patients with suspected acute colonic diverticulitis, to come to an evidence-based approach to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis.

The team performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnosis and diagnostic modalities in patients with suspected diverticulitis.

Study quality was assessed with the STARD checklist.

Sensitivity of contrast enema studies varied between 80% and 83%
Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology

True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings were extracted and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity per diagnostic test were calculated, if applicable.

The research team noted that the overall quality of the studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnosis, contrast enema and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were moderate to poor and not suitable for meta-analysis.

Sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis varied between 64% and 68%.

Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) studies were eligible for meta-analysis.

The team found that summary sensitivity estimates for US were 90% versus 95% for CT.

Summary specificity estimates for US were 90% versus 96% for CT.

The researchers found that the sensitivity for MRI was 98% and specificity varied between 70% and 78%.

Sensitivity of contrast enema studies varied between 80% and 83%.

Dr Andeweg's team concludes, "In two-thirds of the patients, the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis can be made based on clinical evaluation alone."

"In one-third of the patients, additional imaging is a necessity to establish the diagnosis."

"US and CT are comparable in diagnosing diverticulitis and superior to other modalities."

"CT has the advantage of higher specificity and the ability to identify alternative diagnoses."

"The role of MRI is not yet clear in diagnosing acute colonic diverticulitis."

"Contrast enema is considered an obsolete imaging technique to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis based on lower sensitivity and specificity than US and CT."

"A step-up approach with CT performed after an inconclusive or negative US, seems a logical and safe approach for patients suspected of acute colonic diverticulitis."

Scand J Gastroenterol 2014: 49(7): 775-784
15 July 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 29 September 2016 
Predicting symptomatic outcomes in GERD
 29 September 2016 
Biologic therapies in IBD
 29 September 2016 
Predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer
 28 September 2016 
Global trends in pancreatic cancer mortality
 28 September 2016 
Hep C virus RNA in liver explants
 28 September 2016 
Heterogeneity in endoscopic treatment of Crohn’s
 27 September 2016 
Non-invasive tests of NAFLD
 27 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation for C.diff in IBD
 27 September 2016 
Fast-track colorectal surgery influences outcomes
 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 02 September 2016 
Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and GERD 
 02 September 2016 
Postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum
 02 September 2016 
Postop recurrence of Crohn's

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us