Help
Subscribe


All of GastroHep is now free access! - Click here to register Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Toward an evidence-based approach in diagnosing diverticulitis

The latest issue of the Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology evaluates the accuracy of the clinical evaluation and diagnostic modalities for patients with suspected acute colonic diverticulitis.

News image

The lack of pathognomonic findings and the chance of complicated disease have resulted in the widespread use of additional imaging to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis.

The added value of additional imaging in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of acute colonic diverticulitis is not well defined.

Dr Caroline Suzanne Andeweg and colleagues systematically reviewed the literature of the accuracy of the clinical evaluation and diagnostic modalities for patients with suspected acute colonic diverticulitis, to come to an evidence-based approach to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis.

The team performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnosis and diagnostic modalities in patients with suspected diverticulitis.

Study quality was assessed with the STARD checklist.

Sensitivity of contrast enema studies varied between 80% and 83%
Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology

True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings were extracted and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity per diagnostic test were calculated, if applicable.

The research team noted that the overall quality of the studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnosis, contrast enema and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were moderate to poor and not suitable for meta-analysis.

Sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis varied between 64% and 68%.

Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) studies were eligible for meta-analysis.

The team found that summary sensitivity estimates for US were 90% versus 95% for CT.

Summary specificity estimates for US were 90% versus 96% for CT.

The researchers found that the sensitivity for MRI was 98% and specificity varied between 70% and 78%.

Sensitivity of contrast enema studies varied between 80% and 83%.

Dr Andeweg's team concludes, "In two-thirds of the patients, the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis can be made based on clinical evaluation alone."

"In one-third of the patients, additional imaging is a necessity to establish the diagnosis."

"US and CT are comparable in diagnosing diverticulitis and superior to other modalities."

"CT has the advantage of higher specificity and the ability to identify alternative diagnoses."

"The role of MRI is not yet clear in diagnosing acute colonic diverticulitis."

"Contrast enema is considered an obsolete imaging technique to diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis based on lower sensitivity and specificity than US and CT."

"A step-up approach with CT performed after an inconclusive or negative US, seems a logical and safe approach for patients suspected of acute colonic diverticulitis."

Scand J Gastroenterol 2014: 49(7): 775-784
15 July 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 01 August 2014

Advanced search
 01 August 2014 
Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign biliary strictures
 01 August 2014 
Capsule colonoscopy vs CT colonography for polyp screening
 01 August 2014 
Complications after obesity surgery
 31 July 2014 
Biomarkers in liver fibrosis
 31 July 2014 
Risk factors of large colorectal polyps
 31 July 2014 
Diverticular disease and colon cancer
 30 July 2014 
Interval between screening colonoscopies
 30 July 2014 
Small intestinal permeability in diarrhea predominant IBS
 30 July 2014 
Mineral rich water and constipation
 29 July 2014 
Fluticasone in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 July 2014 
Causes of GI bleeding in cirrhosis
 29 July 2014 
ALT increases in Hep B
 28 July 2014 
Statins reduce Barrett's
 28 July 2014 
Score predicts risk for Barrett’s esophagus
 28 July 2014 
Gastric cancer prevention
 25 July 2014 
De-escalation of therapy in IBD
 25 July 2014 
Bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes
 25 July 2014 
Primary care physician counselling and colonoscopy
 24 July 2014 
Diagnostic tool for obscure-overt GI bleeding
 24 July 2014 
Statin use and Barrett’s esophagus
 24 July 2014 
Atopy and functional GI disorders
 23 July 2014 
Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for Hep C
 23 July 2014 
Early corticosteroids after the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis
 23 July 2014 
C-section and IBD risk
 22 July 2014 
Thromboembolism in IBD
 22 July 2014 
Alcohol and colorectal adenoma risk
 22 July 2014 
Cognitive behavioral therapy in IBS
 21 July 2014 
Stents to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
 21 July 2014 
Psychometric validation of IBS symptom severity
 21 July 2014 
Mortality in IBD
 18 July 2014 
Treatment of enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
 18 July 2014 
Ulcer complications and dyspeptic symptoms
 18 July 2014 
ERCP with overtube-assisted enteroscopy
 17 July 2014 
Treatment of H. pylori
 17 July 2014 
Ultrasound for diagnosis of gastric varices
 17 July 2014 
Small intestinal permeability in diarrhea predominant IBS
 16 July 2014 
Mortality after colectomy in IBD
 16 July 2014 
Esophageal cancer missed at endoscopy
 16 July 2014 
Screening for Hepatitis B
 15 July 2014 
Diagnosing diverticulitis
 15 July 2014 
Variation in management decisions for colorectal cancer
 15 July 2014 
Muscle cramps in cirrhosis
 14 July 2014 
Predicting the course of ulcerative colitis
 14 July 2014 
Choice in colorectal cancer screening tests
 14 July 2014 
Adhesions in abdominal surgery
 11 July 2014 
Temporal evolution of antidrug antibodies in IBD
 11 July 2014 
Atopy and functional gastrointestinal disorders
 11 July 2014 
Fecal microbiota transplant for C. diff
 10 July 2014 
Acid-suppressive medications and cancer risk in Barrett's
 10 July 2014 
Personalized medicine in the management of IBD
 10 July 2014 
Pregnancy outcome in anti-TNF treated women with IBD
 09 July 2014 
Quality of care provided to patients with varices
 09 July 2014 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and celiac disease
 09 July 2014 
Diagnosis and management of adult celiac disease
 08 July 2014 
Screening for Hep B
 08 July 2014 
NSAID-induced small intestinal injury
 08 July 2014 
Drug-induced liver injury
 07 July 2014 
Obesity and complications after lapaproscopic colorectal surgery
 07 July 2014 
Everolimus and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
 07 July 2014 
Pediatric celiac disease risk factors

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2014 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us