Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 10 December 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Fecal microbiota transplant treats C. difficile in immunocompromised patients

A study in this month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology examines fecal microbiota transplant for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients.

News image

Patients who are immunocompromised are at increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which has increased to epidemic proportions over the past decade.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) appears effective for the treatment of Clostridium difficile, although there is concern that immunocompromised patients may be at increased risk of having adverse events related to FMT.

Dr Colleen Kelly and colleagues from Rhode Island, USA describe the multicenter experience of FMT in immunocompromised patients.

A multicenter retrospective series was performed on the use of FMT in immunocompromised patients with Clostridium difficile that was recurrent, refractory, or severe.

The research team described rates of Clostridium difficile cure after FMT as well as adverse events experienced by immunocompromised patients after FMT.

79% were outpatients at the time of FMT
American Journal of Gastroenterology

A 32-item questionnaire soliciting demographic and pre- and post-FMT data was completed for 99 patients at 16 centers, of whom 80 were eligible for inclusion.

Outcomes included rates of Clostridium difficile cure after FMT, serious adverse events such as death or hospitalization within 12 weeks of FMT, infection within 12 weeks of FMT, and adverse events.

Cases included 75 adult and 5 pediatric patients treated with FMT for recurrent, refractory, and severe and/or overlap of recurrent/refractory and severe Clostridium difficile.
 
The team noted that in all, 79% were outpatients at the time of FMT.

The mean follow-up period between FMT and data collection was 11 months.

Reasons for immunocompromise included HIV/AIDS, solid organ transplant, oncologic condition, immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, and other medical conditions/medications.

The research team found that the Clostridium difficile cure rate after a single FMT was 78%, with 62 patients suffering no recurrence at least 12 weeks post FMT.

The team identified 12 patients who underwent repeat FMT, of whom 8 had no further Clostridium difficile.

Thus, the overall cure rate was 89%.

The researchers found that 15% had any serious adverse event within 12 weeks post FMT, of which 10 were hospitalizations.

The team observed 2 deaths occurred within 12 weeks of FMT, one of which was the result of aspiration during sedation for FMT administered via colonoscopy, and the other was unrelated to FMT.

None suffered infections definitely related to FMT, but 2 patients developed unrelated infections and 5 had self-limited diarrheal illness in which no causal organism was identified.

The team found 1 patient had a superficial mucosal tear caused by the colonoscopy performed for the FMT, and 3 patients reported mild, self-limited abdominal discomfort post FMT.

About 14% of patients experienced disease flare post FMT.

The research team noted 3 ulcerative colitis patients that underwent colectomy related to course of UC >100 days after FMT.

Dr Kelly's team concludes, "This series demonstrates the effective use of FMT for Clostridium difficile in immunocompromized patients with few serious adverse events or related adverse events."

"Importantly, there were no related infectious complications in these high-risk patients."

Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1065–1071
11 July 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 09 December 2016 
Use of GI alarm features for colorectal cancer diagnosis
 09 December 2016 
Emergency department use by IBD patients
 09 December 2016 
PPI regimens for upper GI bleeds
 08 December 2016 
Preterm birth in women with IBD
 08 December 2016 
Precision medicine in IBD
 08 December 2016 
Intestinal tuberculosis vs Crohn's disease
 07 December 2016 
Iron deficiency in ulcerative colitis
 07 December 2016 
IBD source of information and patient education
 07 December 2016 
End-of-rotation resident transition and in-hospital mortality
 06 December 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 06 December 2016 
Crohn's disease and thyroid cancer risk
 06 December 2016 
IBD Disability Index in restorative proctocolectomy
 05 December 2016 
Reducing hospitalization in IBD
 05 December 2016 
Disease mangement in IBD
 05 December 2016 
New biomarkers for IBD diagnosis
 02 December 2016 
Hep E in acute liver failure
 02 December 2016 
Occurrence and severity of alcoholic hepatitis
 02 December 2016 
Food antigen in active eosinophilic esophagitis
 01 December 2016 
Iron deficiency in anemic ulcerative colitis patients
 01 December 2016 
Prognostic factors after paracetamol-induced liver failure
 01 December 2016 
Factors that influence colorectal cancer screening findings
 30 November 2016 
Certolizumab pegol in Crohn's disease
 30 November 2016 
Genetic risk of Crohn's in chronic granulomatous disease
 30 November 2016 
Rifaximin in diarrhea-predominant IBS
 29 November 2016 
Assessing liver steatosis
 29 November 2016 
Treating Zenker's diverticulum
 29 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis
 28 November 2016 
Complications in celiac disease
 28 November 2016 
Monitoring IBD with mobile technology
 28 November 2016 
Reducing warfarin-related upper GI bleeds
 25 November 2016 
Metal vs plastic stents for pancreatic cancer surgery
 25 November 2016 
Yoga and IBS therapy 
 25 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening issues
 24 November 2016 
Partner burden in celiac disease
 24 November 2016 
Fusobacterium nucleatum for colorectal cancer prognosis
 24 November 2016 
PPIS and gastric cancer risk
 23 November 2016 
Quality assurance standards for colonoscopy
 23 November 2016 
Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis
 23 November 2016 
Readmissions in cirrhosis
 22 November 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea in function bowel disorder with diarrhea
 22 November 2016 
Fatigue in IBD
 22 November 2016 
PPIs and C. diff in ICU 
 21 November 2016 
Pain after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors
 21 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 21 November 2016 
Financial incentives and colorectal cancer screening
 18 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer risk and self-reported family history
 18 November 2016 
Ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease
 18 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 17 November 2016 
Liver-related specialty care in patients with Hep C
 17 November 2016 
Risk of overweight in infants
 17 November 2016 
Moderate alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 16 November 2016 
PPI therapy in liver disease
 16 November 2016 
Education in Gastroenterology fellowship
 16 November 2016 
Paternal preconceptional use of anti-TNF-α agents
 15 November 2016 
Novel treatment of NASH 
 15 November 2016 
Contraceptives and ulcerative colitis
 15 November 2016 
Physician perspectives on Hep C management
 14 November 2016 
Cardiovascular risk in NAFLD 
 14 November 2016 
Vit D and NAFLD
 14 November 2016 
Malignancy risk in IBD 

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us