Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 01 July 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Fecal microbiota transplant treats C. difficile in immunocompromised patients

A study in this month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology examines fecal microbiota transplant for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients.

News image

Patients who are immunocompromised are at increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which has increased to epidemic proportions over the past decade.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) appears effective for the treatment of Clostridium difficile, although there is concern that immunocompromised patients may be at increased risk of having adverse events related to FMT.

Dr Colleen Kelly and colleagues from Rhode Island, USA describe the multicenter experience of FMT in immunocompromised patients.

A multicenter retrospective series was performed on the use of FMT in immunocompromised patients with Clostridium difficile that was recurrent, refractory, or severe.

The research team described rates of Clostridium difficile cure after FMT as well as adverse events experienced by immunocompromised patients after FMT.

79% were outpatients at the time of FMT
American Journal of Gastroenterology

A 32-item questionnaire soliciting demographic and pre- and post-FMT data was completed for 99 patients at 16 centers, of whom 80 were eligible for inclusion.

Outcomes included rates of Clostridium difficile cure after FMT, serious adverse events such as death or hospitalization within 12 weeks of FMT, infection within 12 weeks of FMT, and adverse events.

Cases included 75 adult and 5 pediatric patients treated with FMT for recurrent, refractory, and severe and/or overlap of recurrent/refractory and severe Clostridium difficile.
 
The team noted that in all, 79% were outpatients at the time of FMT.

The mean follow-up period between FMT and data collection was 11 months.

Reasons for immunocompromise included HIV/AIDS, solid organ transplant, oncologic condition, immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, and other medical conditions/medications.

The research team found that the Clostridium difficile cure rate after a single FMT was 78%, with 62 patients suffering no recurrence at least 12 weeks post FMT.

The team identified 12 patients who underwent repeat FMT, of whom 8 had no further Clostridium difficile.

Thus, the overall cure rate was 89%.

The researchers found that 15% had any serious adverse event within 12 weeks post FMT, of which 10 were hospitalizations.

The team observed 2 deaths occurred within 12 weeks of FMT, one of which was the result of aspiration during sedation for FMT administered via colonoscopy, and the other was unrelated to FMT.

None suffered infections definitely related to FMT, but 2 patients developed unrelated infections and 5 had self-limited diarrheal illness in which no causal organism was identified.

The team found 1 patient had a superficial mucosal tear caused by the colonoscopy performed for the FMT, and 3 patients reported mild, self-limited abdominal discomfort post FMT.

About 14% of patients experienced disease flare post FMT.

The research team noted 3 ulcerative colitis patients that underwent colectomy related to course of UC >100 days after FMT.

Dr Kelly's team concludes, "This series demonstrates the effective use of FMT for Clostridium difficile in immunocompromized patients with few serious adverse events or related adverse events."

"Importantly, there were no related infectious complications in these high-risk patients."

Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1065–1071
11 July 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 01 July 2016 
Aspirin and colorectal cancer
 01 July 2016 
Outcome measures in celiac disease
 01 July 2016 
Growth factor activity and IBD
 30 June 2016 
Staging system for familial adenomatous polyposis
 30 June 2016 
Antibiotics in children and obesity
 30 June 2016 
IBS-type symptoms in pediatric IBD
 29 June 2016 
Hep C eradication in people who inject drugs
 29 June 2016 
Anti-tumor necrosis factor in mothers and newborns
 29 June 2016 
Progression to esophageal carcinoma in Barrett's
 28 June 2016 
Gastric cancer screening in the USA
 28 June 2016 
Acute severe ulcerative colitis
 28 June 2016 
Cancer recurrence after immune-suppressive therapies
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us