Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 27 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Polypectomy rate as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate

Polypectomy rate as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist, reports the latest issue of the Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

News image

The adenoma detection rate is an important measure of the quality of colonoscopy.

It is associated with interval colorectal cancer and varies among sexes and locations.

Recommended indicators of competence for colonoscopy include minimal adenoma detection rate >25% for average-risk men and >15% for women.

These adenoma detection rates are rigorous, so polypectomy detection rate has been suggested as a surrogate.

Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal colon, where interval cancers are more likely to occur.

Dr Madhusudhan Sanaka and colleagues compared adenoma detection rates and polypectomy detection rates in different segments of colon and between sexes.

The mean overall polypectomy detection rate was 42%
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The research team performed a cross-sectional review of findings from 2167 screening colonoscopies performed by 65 endoscopists on average-risk outpatients at the Cleveland Clinic, 2008–2009.

The team reviewed colonoscopy and pathology reports of randomly selected procedures.

The researchers calculated polypectomy detection rates, adenoma detection rates, and correlation between polypectomy and adenoma detection rate for each colon segment and sex.

The team found that the mean overall polypectomy detection rate was 42%, and adenoma detection rate was 25%.

The team noted that the correlation between overall adenoma detection rate and polypectomy detection rate was stron.

Polypectomy detection rate of 40% in men and 30% in women correlated with the established minimum benchmark adenoma detection rates of 25% and 15% for men and women, respectively.

Polypectomy detection rate was more strongly correlated with adenoma detection rate in the proximal colon than the distal colon.

The researcher's correlation was stronger in men than in women, as well as in the entire colon, the proximal colon, and the distal colon.

The advanced adenoma detection rate was 4% and did not correlate with polypectomy detection rate.

Dr Sanaka's team concludes, "On the basis of a review of findings from screening colonoscopies, overall polypectomy detection rate correlates with adenoma detection rate for the entire colon, but polypectomy detection rate and adenoma detection rate correlate most strongly for the proximal colon, where many adenomas can be missed and interval cancers develop."

"The correlation between polypectomy detection rate and adenoma detection rate is weaker for women than men and for distal colon."

"If polypectomy detection rate is used as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate, colon location and patient sex should be considered."

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014: 12(7): 1137–1142
30 June 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 27 September 2016 
Non-invasive tests of NAFLD
 27 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation for C.diff in IBD
 27 September 2016 
Fast-track colorectal surgery influences outcomes
 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer
 02 September 2016 
Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and GERD 
 02 September 2016 
Postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum
 02 September 2016 
Postop recurrence of Crohn's
 01 September 2016 
Prognostic test for liver transplants
 01 September 2016 
Recovery after colorectal surgery in elderly patients
 01 September 2016 
Obesity and post-ERCP pancreatitis
 30 August 2016 
NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis
 30 August 2016 
Quality improvement program after colorectal surgery
 30 August 2016 
Gut microbial diversity in smokers with Crohn's

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us