Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 02 July 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Polypectomy rate as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate

Polypectomy rate as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist, reports the latest issue of the Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

News image

The adenoma detection rate is an important measure of the quality of colonoscopy.

It is associated with interval colorectal cancer and varies among sexes and locations.

Recommended indicators of competence for colonoscopy include minimal adenoma detection rate >25% for average-risk men and >15% for women.

These adenoma detection rates are rigorous, so polypectomy detection rate has been suggested as a surrogate.

Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal colon, where interval cancers are more likely to occur.

Dr Madhusudhan Sanaka and colleagues compared adenoma detection rates and polypectomy detection rates in different segments of colon and between sexes.

The mean overall polypectomy detection rate was 42%
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The research team performed a cross-sectional review of findings from 2167 screening colonoscopies performed by 65 endoscopists on average-risk outpatients at the Cleveland Clinic, 2008–2009.

The team reviewed colonoscopy and pathology reports of randomly selected procedures.

The researchers calculated polypectomy detection rates, adenoma detection rates, and correlation between polypectomy and adenoma detection rate for each colon segment and sex.

The team found that the mean overall polypectomy detection rate was 42%, and adenoma detection rate was 25%.

The team noted that the correlation between overall adenoma detection rate and polypectomy detection rate was stron.

Polypectomy detection rate of 40% in men and 30% in women correlated with the established minimum benchmark adenoma detection rates of 25% and 15% for men and women, respectively.

Polypectomy detection rate was more strongly correlated with adenoma detection rate in the proximal colon than the distal colon.

The researcher's correlation was stronger in men than in women, as well as in the entire colon, the proximal colon, and the distal colon.

The advanced adenoma detection rate was 4% and did not correlate with polypectomy detection rate.

Dr Sanaka's team concludes, "On the basis of a review of findings from screening colonoscopies, overall polypectomy detection rate correlates with adenoma detection rate for the entire colon, but polypectomy detection rate and adenoma detection rate correlate most strongly for the proximal colon, where many adenomas can be missed and interval cancers develop."

"The correlation between polypectomy detection rate and adenoma detection rate is weaker for women than men and for distal colon."

"If polypectomy detection rate is used as a surrogate for adenoma detection rate, colon location and patient sex should be considered."

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014: 12(7): 1137–1142
30 June 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 01 July 2016 
Aspirin and colorectal cancer
 01 July 2016 
Outcome measures in celiac disease
 01 July 2016 
Growth factor activity and IBD
 30 June 2016 
Staging system for familial adenomatous polyposis
 30 June 2016 
Antibiotics in children and obesity
 30 June 2016 
IBS-type symptoms in pediatric IBD
 29 June 2016 
Hep C eradication in people who inject drugs
 29 June 2016 
Anti-tumor necrosis factor in mothers and newborns
 29 June 2016 
Progression to esophageal carcinoma in Barrett's
 28 June 2016 
Gastric cancer screening in the USA
 28 June 2016 
Acute severe ulcerative colitis
 28 June 2016 
Cancer recurrence after immune-suppressive therapies
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us