Help
Subscribe


Submit Videos to GastroHep Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Sphincterotomy vs sham does not reduce pain-related disability after cholecystectomy

A team of doctors examine the effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy, reports this weeks issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

News image

Abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is common and may be attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Management often involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

Professor Peter Cotton and colleagues from South Carolina, USA determined whether endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces pain, and whether sphincter manometric pressure is predictive of pain relief.

The team performed a multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized trial involving 214 patients with pain after cholecystectomy without significant abnormalities on imaging or laboratory studies, and no prior sphincter treatment or pancreatitis.

The patients were randomly assigned to undergo sphincterotomy or sham therapy at 7 referral medical centers, with a 1-year follow-up up to 2013.

After ERCP, patients were randomized to sphincterotomy or sham irrespective of manometry findings.
23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment
Journal of the American Medical Association

Those randomized to sphincterotomy with elevated pancreatic sphincter pressures were randomized again to biliary or to both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies.

The team reported that 72 were entered into an observational study with conventional ERCP managemeny.

The researchers defined success of treatment as less than 6 days of disability due to pain in the prior 90 days both at months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

The team found that 37% of patients in the sham treatment group vs 23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment.

Of the patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension, 30% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 20% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy alone experienced successful treatment.

The research team observed that 26% of patients treated, and 34% of patients in the sham group underwent repeat ERCP interventions.

Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

The team noted that no clinical subgroups appeared to benefit from sphincterotomy more than others.

Pancreatitis occurred in 11% of patients after primary sphincterotomies, and in 15% in the sham group.

Of the nonrandomized patients in the observational study group, 24% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy, 31% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 17% who did not undergo sphincterotomy had successful treatment.

Professor Cotton's team concludes, "In patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disability due to pain."

"These findings do not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients."

JAMA 2014;311(20):2101-2109
29 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 20 August 2014

Advanced search
 20 August 2014 
Stool methylated DNA markers and colorectal cancer resection
 20 August 2014 
Rectal surgery mortality
 20 August 2014 
Chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis
 19 August 2014 
Recurrent C. difficile infection in out-patients
 19 August 2014 
Racial disparities and colon cancer
 19 August 2014 
Variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions
 18 August 2014 
The evolution of urban C. difficile
 18 August 2014 
Metabolomic analysis in IBD
 18 August 2014 
Enhanced T-cell response in acute-on-chronic Hep B
 15 August 2014 
Abdominal pain in IBS
 15 August 2014 
Gene expression biomarker in ulcerative colitis
 15 August 2014 
Population-based fecal immunochemical test screening
 14 August 2014 
Transnasal vs transoral endoscopy
 14 August 2014 
Radiation exposure in gastroenterology
 14 August 2014 
Dietary fibre and diverticular disease
 13 August 2014 
Adherence to Rome criteria in functional dyspepsia
 13 August 2014 
Fecal immunochemical test screening
 13 August 2014 
Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
 12 August 2014 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and celiac disease
 12 August 2014 
Management of Lynch syndrome
 12 August 2014 
Risk of cancer under immunosuppressive therapy in IBD
 11 August 2014 
Gut microbiota in chemotherapy-induced GI mucositis
 11 August 2014 
Risk of GI bleeds with anticoagulants
 11 August 2014 
Social media in health-care
 08 August 2014 
Surgeon volume and esophagectomy survival
 08 August 2014 
Endoscopy nurse-administered propofol sedation performance
 08 August 2014 
Therapy for biliary tract cancer
 07 August 2014 
Smoking cessation and age of onset of ulcerative colitis
 07 August 2014 
Global consensus on perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease
 07 August 2014 
Colonoscopy length and training duration
 06 August 2014 
Hepatitis C virus infection in the United States
 06 August 2014 
Pediatric to adult IBD care
 06 August 2014 
Biomarker of disease activity in IBD
 05 August 2014 
Rising incidence of celiac disease
 05 August 2014 
Socioeconomic status and IBS
 05 August 2014 
Bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery
 04 August 2014 
Relative adrenal insufficiency and chronic liver disease
 04 August 2014 
Colonoscopy screening protocol for liver transplant recipients
 04 August 2014 
Patient-reported outcomes after upper GI bleed
 01 August 2014 
Capsule colonoscopy vs CT colonography for polyp screening
 01 August 2014 
Complications after obesity surgery
 01 August 2014 
Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign biliary strictures
 31 July 2014 
Diverticular disease and colon cancer
 31 July 2014 
Biomarkers in liver fibrosis
 31 July 2014 
Risk factors of large colorectal polyps
 30 July 2014 
Interval between screening colonoscopies
 30 July 2014 
Small intestinal permeability in diarrhea predominant IBS
 30 July 2014 
Mineral rich water and constipation
 29 July 2014 
Fluticasone in eosinophilic esophagitis
 29 July 2014 
Causes of GI bleeding in cirrhosis
 29 July 2014 
ALT increases in Hep B
 28 July 2014 
Statins reduce Barrett's
 28 July 2014 
Score predicts risk for Barrett’s esophagus
 28 July 2014 
Gastric cancer prevention
 25 July 2014 
De-escalation of therapy in IBD
 25 July 2014 
Bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes
 25 July 2014 
Primary care physician counselling and colonoscopy
 24 July 2014 
Diagnostic tool for obscure-overt GI bleeding
 24 July 2014 
Statin use and Barrett’s esophagus
 24 July 2014 
Atopy and functional GI disorders

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2014 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us