Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 09 February 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Sphincterotomy vs sham does not reduce pain-related disability after cholecystectomy

A team of doctors examine the effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy, reports this weeks issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

News image

Abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is common and may be attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Management often involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

Professor Peter Cotton and colleagues from South Carolina, USA determined whether endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces pain, and whether sphincter manometric pressure is predictive of pain relief.

The team performed a multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized trial involving 214 patients with pain after cholecystectomy without significant abnormalities on imaging or laboratory studies, and no prior sphincter treatment or pancreatitis.

The patients were randomly assigned to undergo sphincterotomy or sham therapy at 7 referral medical centers, with a 1-year follow-up up to 2013.

After ERCP, patients were randomized to sphincterotomy or sham irrespective of manometry findings.
23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment
Journal of the American Medical Association

Those randomized to sphincterotomy with elevated pancreatic sphincter pressures were randomized again to biliary or to both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies.

The team reported that 72 were entered into an observational study with conventional ERCP managemeny.

The researchers defined success of treatment as less than 6 days of disability due to pain in the prior 90 days both at months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

The team found that 37% of patients in the sham treatment group vs 23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment.

Of the patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension, 30% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 20% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy alone experienced successful treatment.

The research team observed that 26% of patients treated, and 34% of patients in the sham group underwent repeat ERCP interventions.

Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

The team noted that no clinical subgroups appeared to benefit from sphincterotomy more than others.

Pancreatitis occurred in 11% of patients after primary sphincterotomies, and in 15% in the sham group.

Of the nonrandomized patients in the observational study group, 24% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy, 31% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 17% who did not undergo sphincterotomy had successful treatment.

Professor Cotton's team concludes, "In patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disability due to pain."

"These findings do not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients."

JAMA 2014;311(20):2101-2109
29 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 09 February 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and parental allergies
 09 February 2016 
Cancer-specific prognosis in octogenarians with colorectal cancer
 09 February 2016 
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy screening
 08 February 2016 
Immunity in the human gut
 08 February 2016 
Cancelled colonoscopy appointments
 08 February 2016 
Cognitive function in Crohn's disease
 05 February 2016 
Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia
 05 February 2016 
Treatment for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn’s colitis
 05 February 2016 
Methotrexate and remission in ulcerative colitis
 04 February 2016 
Diabetes and liver cancer
 04 February 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening
 04 February 2016 
H. pylori and coronary heart disease 
 03 February 2016 
Acute diverticulitis and IBS 
 03 February 2016 
Microbiota of the colonic mucosa and chronic constipation
 03 February 2016 
Guidelines for chronic pancreatitis
 02 February 2016 
Ramosetron and IBS-diarrhea
 02 February 2016 
IBD emergency department visits
 02 February 2016 
Probiotics for H. pylori management
 01 February 2016 
Managing HBV in pregnancy
 01 February 2016 
Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma risk
 01 February 2016 
Depressive symptoms in IBD 
 29 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after colonoscopy
 29 January 2016 
Acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients
 29 January 2016 
Vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk
 28 January 2016 
Tissue anti-TNF drug levels and IBD
 28 January 2016 
First line treatment of H. pylori infection
 28 January 2016 
Tetracycline for rosacea increases the risk of IBD
 27 January 2016 
Steroids in children with Crohn's
 27 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program 
 27 January 2016 
Human gut microbiome in IBD 
 26 January 2016 
Smoking and symptomatic diverticular disease
 26 January 2016 
Step-down therapy in PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia 
 26 January 2016 
Diet and IBD risk
 25 January 2016 
IBD monitoring using smartphones
 25 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program
 25 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after a negative screening sigmoidoscopy
 22 January 2016 
Length of Barrett's and cancer
 22 January 2016 
Psychosocial interventions and alcohol abstinence in chronic liver disease
 22 January 2016 
Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance
 21 January 2016 
Increasing adenoma detection rate during colonoscope withdrawal
 21 January 2016 
Microscopic colitis current concepts
 21 January 2016 
Statins as a management strategy for constipation 
 20 January 2016 
Health status after bariatric surgery
 20 January 2016 
Hep E infection in West Africa
 20 January 2016 
Preventing endoscopic bacterial transmission
 19 January 2016 
PPIs and phlebotomy in hereditary hemochromatosis
 19 January 2016 
Predicting liver cirrhosis in Hep C
 19 January 2016 
Frozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation
 18 January 2016 
Hospitalization for diverticulitis in the USA
 18 January 2016 
H. pylori and gastric cancer across Europe
 18 January 2016 
Enteral nutrition in children with Crohn's
 15 January 2016 
Alcohol- and HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 January 2016 
Recurrent colonic diverticulitis
 15 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk
 14 January 2016 
Risk stratification of incidentally discovered gallstones
 14 January 2016 
Treatment of refractory cholestatic pruritus
 14 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk 
 13 January 2016 
C-section delivery and IBD risk
 13 January 2016 
Primary biliary cholangitis treatment with incomplete UDCA response
 13 January 2016 
Colon cancer screening rates 

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us