Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 31 August 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Sphincterotomy vs sham does not reduce pain-related disability after cholecystectomy

A team of doctors examine the effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy, reports this weeks issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

News image

Abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is common and may be attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Management often involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

Professor Peter Cotton and colleagues from South Carolina, USA determined whether endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces pain, and whether sphincter manometric pressure is predictive of pain relief.

The team performed a multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized trial involving 214 patients with pain after cholecystectomy without significant abnormalities on imaging or laboratory studies, and no prior sphincter treatment or pancreatitis.

The patients were randomly assigned to undergo sphincterotomy or sham therapy at 7 referral medical centers, with a 1-year follow-up up to 2013.

After ERCP, patients were randomized to sphincterotomy or sham irrespective of manometry findings.
23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment
Journal of the American Medical Association

Those randomized to sphincterotomy with elevated pancreatic sphincter pressures were randomized again to biliary or to both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies.

The team reported that 72 were entered into an observational study with conventional ERCP managemeny.

The researchers defined success of treatment as less than 6 days of disability due to pain in the prior 90 days both at months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

The team found that 37% of patients in the sham treatment group vs 23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment.

Of the patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension, 30% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 20% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy alone experienced successful treatment.

The research team observed that 26% of patients treated, and 34% of patients in the sham group underwent repeat ERCP interventions.

Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

The team noted that no clinical subgroups appeared to benefit from sphincterotomy more than others.

Pancreatitis occurred in 11% of patients after primary sphincterotomies, and in 15% in the sham group.

Of the nonrandomized patients in the observational study group, 24% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy, 31% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 17% who did not undergo sphincterotomy had successful treatment.

Professor Cotton's team concludes, "In patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disability due to pain."

"These findings do not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients."

JAMA 2014;311(20):2101-2109
29 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 30 August 2016 
Gut microbial diversity in smokers with Crohn's
 30 August 2016 
Quality improvement program after colorectal surgery
 30 August 2016 
NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis
 29 August 2016 
Reducing Hep B-related HCC
 29 August 2016 
Hep B immunization of infants for liver cancer
 29 August 2016 
Risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 26 August 2016 
Reasons for premature surveillance colonoscopy
 26 August 2016 
Celiac disease therapeutics
 26 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic dissection-induced gastric ulcers
 25 August 2016 
Short-chain fatty acids in mixed refractory constipation
 25 August 2016 
Post-infectious IBS in C. diff
 25 August 2016 
Stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening
 24 August 2016 
Genetics and therapy response in IBD
 24 August 2016 
Hep B after infant vaccination program
 24 August 2016 
Obeticholic acid for primary biliary cholangitis
 23 August 2016 
Colorectal cancer genetics as biomarkers
 23 August 2016 
Prognostic test for mortality after liver transplant
 23 August 2016 
Postoperative mortality in elderly with IBD
 22 August 2016 
Celiac disease in the elderly
 22 August 2016 
Laparoscopic vs open colectomy databases
 22 August 2016 
Mucosal healing and ulcerative colitis outcomes
 19 August 2016 
Dietary questionnaire for GI clinics
 19 August 2016 
Botox treatment for chronic anal fissure
 19 August 2016 
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in GI cancers
 18 August 2016 
Gallstone formation determinants
 18 August 2016 
Age disparities in IBD therapy
 18 August 2016 
Seasonal variation in diverticulitis
 17 August 2016 
IBD activity score for routine clinical use
 17 August 2016 
Attitudes to H. pylori in primary care
 17 August 2016 
Nonselective β-blockers and mortality in cirrhosis
 16 August 2016 
Upper GI lesions in adults with IBD
 16 August 2016 
C. difficile infection and mortality when managed by GI surgeons
 16 August 2016 
HCV eradication in cirrhosis
 15 August 2016 
Predicting favorable outcomes in IBD
 15 August 2016 
Scoring system predicted microscopic colitis
 15 August 2016 
Mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 12 August 2016 
Recurrence of resected gastric cancer
 12 August 2016 
Screening for pancreatic cancer
 12 August 2016 
Index for diagnostic accuracy of Crohn's
 11 August 2016 
Colorectal neoplasm on surveillance colonoscopies
 11 August 2016 
Bowel disease in primary care patients with bowel symptoms
 11 August 2016 
Diagnosis in covert hepatic encephalopathy
 10 August 2016 
Maintenance therapy for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 10 August 2016 
Moderate alcohol use and insulin action in HCV
 10 August 2016 
Consensus on the management of GERD
 09 August 2016 
Pancreatitis quality of life instrument
 09 August 2016 
Gallstone disease and NAFLD
 09 August 2016 
Steroid dependency and IBD
 08 August 2016 
Venous thromboembolism in celiac disease
 08 August 2016 
C. diff in IBD 
 08 August 2016 
Gut-directed hypnotherapy vs low FODMAP diet in IBS
 05 August 2016 
Therapy for H.pylori treatment
 05 August 2016 
Obesity and the development of NAFLD
 05 August 2016 
Obesity and CVD in celiac disease
 04 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 04 August 2016 
Novel risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 04 August 2016 
Ondansetron for children with acute gastroenteritis
 03 August 2016 
Post-colonoscopy complications
 03 August 2016 
IVF in women with IBD
 03 August 2016 
Post-operative pancreatic fistulae after pancreatic surgery

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us