Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 24 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Sphincterotomy vs sham does not reduce pain-related disability after cholecystectomy

A team of doctors examine the effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy, reports this weeks issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

News image

Abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is common and may be attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Management often involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

Professor Peter Cotton and colleagues from South Carolina, USA determined whether endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces pain, and whether sphincter manometric pressure is predictive of pain relief.

The team performed a multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized trial involving 214 patients with pain after cholecystectomy without significant abnormalities on imaging or laboratory studies, and no prior sphincter treatment or pancreatitis.

The patients were randomly assigned to undergo sphincterotomy or sham therapy at 7 referral medical centers, with a 1-year follow-up up to 2013.

After ERCP, patients were randomized to sphincterotomy or sham irrespective of manometry findings.
23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment
Journal of the American Medical Association

Those randomized to sphincterotomy with elevated pancreatic sphincter pressures were randomized again to biliary or to both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies.

The team reported that 72 were entered into an observational study with conventional ERCP managemeny.

The researchers defined success of treatment as less than 6 days of disability due to pain in the prior 90 days both at months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

The team found that 37% of patients in the sham treatment group vs 23% in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment.

Of the patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension, 30% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 20% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy alone experienced successful treatment.

The research team observed that 26% of patients treated, and 34% of patients in the sham group underwent repeat ERCP interventions.

Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

The team noted that no clinical subgroups appeared to benefit from sphincterotomy more than others.

Pancreatitis occurred in 11% of patients after primary sphincterotomies, and in 15% in the sham group.

Of the nonrandomized patients in the observational study group, 24% who underwent biliary sphincterotomy, 31% who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 17% who did not undergo sphincterotomy had successful treatment.

Professor Cotton's team concludes, "In patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disability due to pain."

"These findings do not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients."

JAMA 2014;311(20):2101-2109
29 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer
 02 September 2016 
Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and GERD 
 02 September 2016 
Postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum
 02 September 2016 
Postop recurrence of Crohn's
 01 September 2016 
Prognostic test for liver transplants
 01 September 2016 
Recovery after colorectal surgery in elderly patients
 01 September 2016 
Obesity and post-ERCP pancreatitis
 30 August 2016 
NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis
 30 August 2016 
Quality improvement program after colorectal surgery
 30 August 2016 
Gut microbial diversity in smokers with Crohn's
 29 August 2016 
Reducing Hep B-related HCC
 29 August 2016 
Hep B immunization of infants for liver cancer
 29 August 2016 
Risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 26 August 2016 
Reasons for premature surveillance colonoscopy
 26 August 2016 
Celiac disease therapeutics
 26 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic dissection-induced gastric ulcers

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us