Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 29 June 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Value of PET before liver surgery for colorectal cancer metasases is queried

A study in this week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association examines the effect of PET before liver resection on the surgical management of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases.

News image

Patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases undergo hepatic resection with curative intent.

Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) could help avoid noncurative surgery by identifying patients with occult metastases.

Dr Carol-Anne Moulton and colleagues from Canada determined the effect of preoperative PET-CT vs no PET-CT (control) on the surgical management of patients with resectable metastases.

The team investigated the effect of PET-CT on survival and the association between the standardized uptake value, and survival.

The team conducted a randomized trial of patients older than 18 years with colorectal cancer treated by surgery, with resectable metastases based on CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis within the previous 30 days, and with a clear colonoscopy within the previous 18 months between 2005 and 2013.

The trial involved 21 surgeons at 9 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, with PET-CT scanners at 5 academic institutions.
Liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group
Journal of the American Medical Association

Patients were randomized using a 2 to 1 ratio to PET-CT or control.

The researchers' primary outcome was a change in surgical management defined as canceled hepatic surgery, more extensive hepatic surgery, or additional organ surgery based on the PET-CT.

Survival was a secondary outcome.

Of the 263 patients who underwent PET-CT, the team noted that 21 had a change in surgical management.

Specifically, 3% of patients did not undergo laparotomy, 2% had more extensive hepatic surgery, 3% had additional organ surgery, and the abdominal cavity was opened in 1 patient but hepatic surgery was not performed, and the cavity was closed.

The team observed that liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group, and 92% of the control group.

After a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated mortality rate was 11 events per 1000 person-months for the PET-CT group, and 13 events per 1000 person-months for the control group.

The team noted that survival did not differ between the 2 groups.

The researchers found that standardized uptake value was associated with survival.

The C statistic for the model including the standardized uptake value was 0.62, and without it was 0.50.

The difference in C statistics is 0.12.

The team report that a low C statistic suggests that the standard uptake value is not a strong predictor of overall survival.

Dr Moulton's team concludes, "Among patients with potentially resectable hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma, the use of PET-CT compared with CT alone did not result in frequent change in surgical management."

"These findings raise questions about the value of PET-CT scans in this setting."

JAMA 2014; 311(18): 1863-1869
16 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 29 June 2016 
Progression to esophageal carcinoma in Barrett's
 29 June 2016 
Hep C eradication in people who inject drugs
 29 June 2016 
Anti-tumor necrosis factor in mothers and newborns
 28 June 2016 
Gastric cancer screening in the USA
 28 June 2016 
Acute severe ulcerative colitis
 28 June 2016 
Cancer recurrence after immune-suppressive therapies
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis
 03 June 2016 
Antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhosis
 03 June 2016 
Mortality in hospitalized peptic ulcer patients
 03 June 2016 
Decision aid for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis
 02 June 2016 
Allergy tests for eosinophilic esophagitis
 02 June 2016 
Fatty liver disease and mortality
 02 June 2016 
Ethnic inequalities in rectal cancer care

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us