Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 01 October 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Value of PET before liver surgery for colorectal cancer metasases is queried

A study in this week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association examines the effect of PET before liver resection on the surgical management of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases.

News image

Patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases undergo hepatic resection with curative intent.

Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) could help avoid noncurative surgery by identifying patients with occult metastases.

Dr Carol-Anne Moulton and colleagues from Canada determined the effect of preoperative PET-CT vs no PET-CT (control) on the surgical management of patients with resectable metastases.

The team investigated the effect of PET-CT on survival and the association between the standardized uptake value, and survival.

The team conducted a randomized trial of patients older than 18 years with colorectal cancer treated by surgery, with resectable metastases based on CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis within the previous 30 days, and with a clear colonoscopy within the previous 18 months between 2005 and 2013.

The trial involved 21 surgeons at 9 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, with PET-CT scanners at 5 academic institutions.
Liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group
Journal of the American Medical Association

Patients were randomized using a 2 to 1 ratio to PET-CT or control.

The researchers' primary outcome was a change in surgical management defined as canceled hepatic surgery, more extensive hepatic surgery, or additional organ surgery based on the PET-CT.

Survival was a secondary outcome.

Of the 263 patients who underwent PET-CT, the team noted that 21 had a change in surgical management.

Specifically, 3% of patients did not undergo laparotomy, 2% had more extensive hepatic surgery, 3% had additional organ surgery, and the abdominal cavity was opened in 1 patient but hepatic surgery was not performed, and the cavity was closed.

The team observed that liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group, and 92% of the control group.

After a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated mortality rate was 11 events per 1000 person-months for the PET-CT group, and 13 events per 1000 person-months for the control group.

The team noted that survival did not differ between the 2 groups.

The researchers found that standardized uptake value was associated with survival.

The C statistic for the model including the standardized uptake value was 0.62, and without it was 0.50.

The difference in C statistics is 0.12.

The team report that a low C statistic suggests that the standard uptake value is not a strong predictor of overall survival.

Dr Moulton's team concludes, "Among patients with potentially resectable hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma, the use of PET-CT compared with CT alone did not result in frequent change in surgical management."

"These findings raise questions about the value of PET-CT scans in this setting."

JAMA 2014; 311(18): 1863-1869
16 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 30 September 2016 
Gluten breakdown and immunogenicity in celiac disease
 30 September 2016 
Noninvasive detection of NASH
 30 September 2016 
CEA levels to detect recurrent colorectal cancer
 29 September 2016 
Biologic therapies in IBD
 29 September 2016 
Predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer
 29 September 2016 
Predicting symptomatic outcomes in GERD
 28 September 2016 
Hep C virus RNA in liver explants
 28 September 2016 
Global trends in pancreatic cancer mortality
 28 September 2016 
Heterogeneity in endoscopic treatment of Crohn’s
 27 September 2016 
Non-invasive tests of NAFLD
 27 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation for C.diff in IBD
 27 September 2016 
Fast-track colorectal surgery influences outcomes
 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us