Help
Subscribe


Submit Videos to GastroHep Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Value of PET before liver surgery for colorectal cancer metasases is queried

A study in this week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association examines the effect of PET before liver resection on the surgical management of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases.

News image

Patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases undergo hepatic resection with curative intent.

Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) could help avoid noncurative surgery by identifying patients with occult metastases.

Dr Carol-Anne Moulton and colleagues from Canada determined the effect of preoperative PET-CT vs no PET-CT (control) on the surgical management of patients with resectable metastases.

The team investigated the effect of PET-CT on survival and the association between the standardized uptake value, and survival.

The team conducted a randomized trial of patients older than 18 years with colorectal cancer treated by surgery, with resectable metastases based on CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis within the previous 30 days, and with a clear colonoscopy within the previous 18 months between 2005 and 2013.

The trial involved 21 surgeons at 9 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, with PET-CT scanners at 5 academic institutions.
Liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group
Journal of the American Medical Association

Patients were randomized using a 2 to 1 ratio to PET-CT or control.

The researchers' primary outcome was a change in surgical management defined as canceled hepatic surgery, more extensive hepatic surgery, or additional organ surgery based on the PET-CT.

Survival was a secondary outcome.

Of the 263 patients who underwent PET-CT, the team noted that 21 had a change in surgical management.

Specifically, 3% of patients did not undergo laparotomy, 2% had more extensive hepatic surgery, 3% had additional organ surgery, and the abdominal cavity was opened in 1 patient but hepatic surgery was not performed, and the cavity was closed.

The team observed that liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group, and 92% of the control group.

After a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated mortality rate was 11 events per 1000 person-months for the PET-CT group, and 13 events per 1000 person-months for the control group.

The team noted that survival did not differ between the 2 groups.

The researchers found that standardized uptake value was associated with survival.

The C statistic for the model including the standardized uptake value was 0.62, and without it was 0.50.

The difference in C statistics is 0.12.

The team report that a low C statistic suggests that the standard uptake value is not a strong predictor of overall survival.

Dr Moulton's team concludes, "Among patients with potentially resectable hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma, the use of PET-CT compared with CT alone did not result in frequent change in surgical management."

"These findings raise questions about the value of PET-CT scans in this setting."

JAMA 2014; 311(18): 1863-1869
16 May 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 06 July 2015

Advanced search
 06 July 2015 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 06 July 2015 
Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System
 06 July 2015 
Future colorectal surgery for metachronous cancers
 03 July 2015 
Tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency
 03 July 2015 
Aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography
 03 July 2015 
Extracolonic pathologies in colorectal cancer
 02 July 2015 
Ulcerative colitis prognosis after thiopurines withdrawal
 02 July 2015 
Health care use by IBD children
 02 July 2015 
Anastomotic leak and cancer cancer
 01 July 2015 
Oral mechanical bowel preparation
 01 July 2015 
Missed gastric cancers
 01 July 2015 
Probiotics in IBD
 30 June 2015 
Split-dose preparations vs day-before bowel cleansing regimens
 30 June 2015 
Glucocorticoids and peptic ulcer bleeding
 30 June 2015 
NSAIDs and hearburn symptoms
 29 June 2015 
Prevention of pancreatitis after ERCP
 29 June 2015 
Advances in autoimmune pancreatitis
 29 June 2015 
Rescue therapy in ulcerative colitis
 26 June 2015 
Dietary fibre–microbiota interactions
 26 June 2015 

Gene polymorphism in alcoholic liver disease

 26 June 2015 
Gastritis in celiac disease
 25 June 2015 
Vitamin D level and primary biliary cirrhosis
 25 June 2015 
Persistent organ failure in acute cholangitis patients
 25 June 2015 
Fecal microbiota in pediatric IBD
 24 June 2015 
Fatigue scales for IBD
 24 June 2015 
Mucosal healing tests in ulcerative colitis
 24 June 2015 
Environmental risk in IBD
 23 June 2015 
Body composition in children with IBD
 23 June 2015 
Medical vs nurse endoscopists
 23 June 2015 
Marker associated with endoscopic lesion in Crohn's
 22 June 2015 
Gene polymorphism associated with increased liver enzymes
 22 June 2015 
Treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis
 22 June 2015 
Solid organ cancers after liver transplant
 19 June 2015 
Causes of death in HBV
 19 June 2015 
Lifetime benefits of increased adenoma detection rates
 19 June 2015 
Acid-suppressive therapy before anti-reflux surgery
 18 June 2015 
Risk for dyspepsia
 18 June 2015 
Endoscopic activity in symptomatic IBD patients
 18 June 2015 
Regimens for H. pylori eradication
 17 June 2015 
NAFLD risk in celiac disease
 17 June 2015 
Non-invasive markers of advanced liver fibrosis
 17 June 2015 
Patients’ and clinicians’ perception of pouch dysfunction
 16 June 2015 
Risk score for hepatocellular carcinoma screening
 16 June 2015 
Esophageal food bolus impaction
 16 June 2015 
Evaluating lymph node metastasis for rectal cancer
 15 June 2015 
Low-cost colonoscopy training
 15 June 2015 
Determining dysbiosis in IBS or IBD
 15 June 2015 
Light alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 12 June 2015 
Smoking and disease course in IBD
 12 June 2015 
Hep D in a Hep B endemic area
 12 June 2015 
Patient-orientated internet information in ulcerative colitis
 11 June 2015 
Physical inactivity and NAFLD
 11 June 2015 
Esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection
 11 June 2015 
Guideline based screening strategies for hepatitis
 10 June 2015 
Cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in liver disease
 10 June 2015 
Abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer
 10 June 2015 
Pediatric chronic Hep C
 09 June 2015 
Bile acid malabsorption in IBS
 09 June 2015 
Racial differences in celiac disease
 09 June 2015 
Conversion from laparoscopic to open colorectal cancer resection

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us