Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 27 June 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Distance From a Transplant Center is associated with receipt of liver transplant and survival

This week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association examines the association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans.

News image

Importance  Centralization of specialized health care services such as organ transplantation and bariatric surgery is advocated to improve quality, increase efficiency, and reduce cost.

The effect of increased travel on access and outcomes from these services is not fully understood.

Dr David Goldberg and colleagues from Philadelphia, USA evaluated the association between distance from a Veterans Affairs (VA) transplant center (VATC) and access to being waitlisted for liver transplantation, actually having a liver transplant, and mortality.

The team performed a retrospective study of veterans meeting liver transplantation eligibility criteria from 2003 until 2010, using data from the Veterans Health Administrationís integrated, national, electronic medical record linked to Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data.

The team's primary outcome was being waitlisted for transplantation at a VATC.

Secondary outcomes included being waitlisted at any transplant center, undergoing a transplantation, and survival.

From 2003-2010, 50,637 veterans were classified as potentially eligible for transplant.

11% were waitlisted at any transplant center
Journal of the American Medical Association

The team noted that 6% were waitlisted and 49% of those were waitlisted at 1 of the 5 VATCs.

Of 3417 veterans receiving care at a VA hospital located within 100 miles from a VATC,

The team observed that 7% were waitlisted at a VATC, and 11% at any transplant center.

Of 47,219 veterans receiving care at a VA hospital located more than 100 miles from a VATC, 3% were waitlisted at a VATC, and 5% at any transplant center.

In multivariable models, the researchers found that increasing distance to closest VATC was associated with significantly lower odds of being waitlisted at a VATC or any transplant center.

For example, the researchers found that a veteran living 25 miles from a VATC would have a 7% adjusted probability of being waitlisted, whereas a veteran 100 miles from a VATC would have a 6% adjusted probability.

In adjusted models, increasing distance from a VATC was associated with significantly lower transplantation rates.

The researchers found a significantly increased mortality among waitlisted veterans from the time of first hepatic decompensation event in multivariable survival models.

For example, a waitlisted veteran living 25 miles from a VATC would have a 63% 5-year adjusted probability of survival from first hepatic decompensation event compared with a 60% 5-year adjusted probability of survival for a veteran living 100 miles from a VATC.

Dr Goldberg and team conclude, "Among VA patients meeting eligibility criteria for liver transplantation, greater distance from a VATC or any transplant center was associated with lower likelihood of being waitlisted, receiving a liver transplant, and greater likelihood of death."

"The relationship between these findings and centralizing specialized care deserves further investigation."

JAMA 2014; 311(12): 1234-1243
28 March 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologistsí perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohnís complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis
 03 June 2016 
Antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhosis
 03 June 2016 
Mortality in hospitalized peptic ulcer patients
 03 June 2016 
Decision aid for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis
 02 June 2016 
Allergy tests for eosinophilic esophagitis
 02 June 2016 
Fatty liver disease and mortality
 02 June 2016 
Ethnic inequalities in rectal cancer care
 01 June 2016 
Predicting NASH resolution
 01 June 2016 
Predicting relapse in IBD
 01 June 2016 
Treatment of Hep C/HIV after liver transplant
 31 May 2016 
Markers as a reflection of inflammatory burden in ulcerative colitis
 31 May 2016 
Predicting Crohn's diseases before diagnosis
 31 May 2016 
Biomarker predicts post ERCP pancreatitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us