Help
Subscribe


All of GastroHep is now free access! - Click here to register Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Endoscopic vs histological characterization of polyps during screening colonoscopy

The most recent issue of Gut compares endoscopic with histological characterizations of polyps during screening colonoscopy.

News image

As screening colonoscopy becomes more widespread, the costs for histopathological assessment of resected polyps are rising correspondingly.

Reference centres have published highly accurate results for endoscopic polyp classification.

Therefore, it has been proposed that, for smaller polyps, the differential diagnosis that guides follow-up recommendations could be based on endoscopy alone.

Professor Thomas Rösch and colleagues from Germany prospectively assessed whether the high accuracy for endoscopic polyp diagnosis as reported by reference centres can be reproduced in routine screening colonoscopy.

The research team reported that 10 experienced private practice endoscopists had initial training in pit patterns.

Then they assessed all polyps detected during 1069 screening colonoscopies.

Patients were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with conventional or latest generation HDTV instruments.

Image-based recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were correct in only 70% of cases
Gut

The team's main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of in vivo polyp assessment.

Secondary outcome measures were differences between endoscopes and reliability of image-based follow-up recommendations.

The researchers also performed a blinded post hoc analysis of polyp photographs.

The research team assessed 675 polyps.

Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of in vivo diagnoses were 77%, 78% and 73%.

Size of adenomas and endoscope withdrawal time significantly influenced accuracy.

The researchers noted that image-based recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were correct in only 70% of cases.

Post hoc analysis of polyp photographs did not improve accuracy.

Professor Rösch's team concludes, "In everyday practice, endoscopic classification of polyp type is not accurate enough to abandon histopathological assessment, and use of latest generation colonoscopes does not improve this."

"Image-based surveillance recommendations after polypectomy would consequently not meet guideline requirements."

Gut 2014; 63: 458-465
20 February 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 08 July 2015

Advanced search
 08 July 2015 

Nucleoside analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B?

 07 July 2015 
Anastomotic leak after elective surgery for colonic cancer
 07 July 2015 
Fecal transplantation for ulcerative colitis
 07 July 2015 
Obesity and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
 06 July 2015 
Fecal microbiota transplantation
 06 July 2015 
Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System
 06 July 2015 
Future colorectal surgery for metachronous cancers
 03 July 2015 
Tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency
 03 July 2015 
Aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography
 03 July 2015 
Extracolonic pathologies in colorectal cancer
 02 July 2015 
Ulcerative colitis prognosis after thiopurines withdrawal
 02 July 2015 
Health care use by IBD children
 02 July 2015 
Anastomotic leak and cancer cancer
 01 July 2015 
Missed gastric cancers
 01 July 2015 
Oral mechanical bowel preparation
 01 July 2015 
Probiotics in IBD
 30 June 2015 
Split-dose preparations vs day-before bowel cleansing regimens
 30 June 2015 
Glucocorticoids and peptic ulcer bleeding
 30 June 2015 
NSAIDs and hearburn symptoms
 29 June 2015 
Prevention of pancreatitis after ERCP
 29 June 2015 
Advances in autoimmune pancreatitis
 29 June 2015 
Rescue therapy in ulcerative colitis
 26 June 2015 

Gene polymorphism in alcoholic liver disease

 26 June 2015 
Dietary fibre–microbiota interactions
 26 June 2015 
Gastritis in celiac disease
 25 June 2015 
Persistent organ failure in acute cholangitis patients
 25 June 2015 
Vitamin D level and primary biliary cirrhosis
 25 June 2015 
Fecal microbiota in pediatric IBD
 24 June 2015 
Fatigue scales for IBD
 24 June 2015 
Mucosal healing tests in ulcerative colitis
 24 June 2015 
Environmental risk in IBD
 23 June 2015 
Marker associated with endoscopic lesion in Crohn's
 23 June 2015 
Body composition in children with IBD
 23 June 2015 
Medical vs nurse endoscopists
 22 June 2015 
Gene polymorphism associated with increased liver enzymes
 22 June 2015 
Treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis
 22 June 2015 
Solid organ cancers after liver transplant
 19 June 2015 
Causes of death in HBV
 19 June 2015 
Lifetime benefits of increased adenoma detection rates
 19 June 2015 
Acid-suppressive therapy before anti-reflux surgery
 18 June 2015 
Endoscopic activity in symptomatic IBD patients
 18 June 2015 
Regimens for H. pylori eradication
 18 June 2015 
Risk for dyspepsia
 17 June 2015 
NAFLD risk in celiac disease
 17 June 2015 
Non-invasive markers of advanced liver fibrosis
 17 June 2015 
Patients’ and clinicians’ perception of pouch dysfunction
 16 June 2015 
Risk score for hepatocellular carcinoma screening
 16 June 2015 
Esophageal food bolus impaction
 16 June 2015 
Evaluating lymph node metastasis for rectal cancer
 15 June 2015 
Low-cost colonoscopy training
 15 June 2015 
Determining dysbiosis in IBS or IBD
 15 June 2015 
Light alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 12 June 2015 
Smoking and disease course in IBD
 12 June 2015 
Hep D in a Hep B endemic area
 12 June 2015 
Patient-orientated internet information in ulcerative colitis
 11 June 2015 
Physical inactivity and NAFLD
 11 June 2015 
Esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection
 11 June 2015 
Guideline based screening strategies for hepatitis
 10 June 2015 
Cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in liver disease
 10 June 2015 
Abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us