Help
Subscribe


All of GastroHep is now free access! - Click here to register Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Endoscopic vs histological characterization of polyps during screening colonoscopy

The most recent issue of Gut compares endoscopic with histological characterizations of polyps during screening colonoscopy.

News image

As screening colonoscopy becomes more widespread, the costs for histopathological assessment of resected polyps are rising correspondingly.

Reference centres have published highly accurate results for endoscopic polyp classification.

Therefore, it has been proposed that, for smaller polyps, the differential diagnosis that guides follow-up recommendations could be based on endoscopy alone.

Professor Thomas Rösch and colleagues from Germany prospectively assessed whether the high accuracy for endoscopic polyp diagnosis as reported by reference centres can be reproduced in routine screening colonoscopy.

The research team reported that 10 experienced private practice endoscopists had initial training in pit patterns.

Then they assessed all polyps detected during 1069 screening colonoscopies.

Patients were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with conventional or latest generation HDTV instruments.

Image-based recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were correct in only 70% of cases
Gut

The team's main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of in vivo polyp assessment.

Secondary outcome measures were differences between endoscopes and reliability of image-based follow-up recommendations.

The researchers also performed a blinded post hoc analysis of polyp photographs.

The research team assessed 675 polyps.

Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of in vivo diagnoses were 77%, 78% and 73%.

Size of adenomas and endoscope withdrawal time significantly influenced accuracy.

The researchers noted that image-based recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were correct in only 70% of cases.

Post hoc analysis of polyp photographs did not improve accuracy.

Professor Rösch's team concludes, "In everyday practice, endoscopic classification of polyp type is not accurate enough to abandon histopathological assessment, and use of latest generation colonoscopes does not improve this."

"Image-based surveillance recommendations after polypectomy would consequently not meet guideline requirements."

Gut 2014; 63: 458-465
20 February 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 21 April 2015

Advanced search
 21 April 2015 
Risk factors of postpartum bowel changes
 21 April 2015 
Tracking colonoscopy surveillance intervals
 21 April 2015 
PPI increases risk of cryptogenic liver abscess
 20 April 2015 
IBS after traveller's diarhea
 20 April 2015 
Adherence to Hep C treatments
 20 April 2015 
Economic impact of C. diff infection
 17 April 2015 
Synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia
 17 April 2015 
PNPLA3 polymorphisms and NAFLD risk
 17 April 2015 
MELD score and colorectal resection
 16 April 2015 
Bleeding risk in colonic diverticulosis
 16 April 2015 
Minority use of high-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer
 16 April 2015 
Sleep and IBD
 15 April 2015 
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 April 2015 
Score predicts malignant bile duct obstruction
 15 April 2015 
Increased risk of Barrett esophagus
 14 April 2015 
Improving colorectal cancer screening uptake
 14 April 2015 
Colorectal cancer presenting under the age of 50
 14 April 2015 
Functional constipation vs constipation predominant IBS
 13 April 2015 
CRP and acute diverticulitis
 13 April 2015 
Immune based treatments for HCC
 13 April 2015 
Fecal transplant for C. difficile
 10 April 2015 
Hypnotherapy for IBS
 10 April 2015 
Adjuvant therapy after rectal cancer
 10 April 2015 
Viral outcomes in HCV infection
 09 April 2015 
Male IBD patients wishing to conceive
 09 April 2015 
Screening programs based on the fecal immunochemical test
 09 April 2015 
Management of esophageal food impaction
 08 April 2015 
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity
 08 April 2015 
Ambulatory hemorrhoidal surgery
 08 April 2015 
Iron fortification and gut inflammation
 07 April 2015 
Endoscopic managements of GI bleeds
 07 April 2015 
Interventions for eosinophilic esophagitis
 07 April 2015 
Treatment of Hep C virus
 06 April 2015 
Treatment for rectal cancer
 06 April 2015 
Risk stratifying Barrett's esophagus
 06 April 2015 
Cost-effectiveness of HCV
 03 April 2015 
Predicting advanced cancer in Barrett's
 03 April 2015 
Vitamin D deficiency and Hep B outcomes
 03 April 2015 
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in cirrhosis
 02 April 2015 
Physical activity and NAFLD
 02 April 2015 
Genetic risk for Crohn's disease
 02 April 2015 
EUS for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
 01 April 2015 
Analysis of liver fibrosis
 01 April 2015 
Obeticholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis
 01 April 2015 
Mortality rates for upper GI bleeds
 31 March 2015 
HCV-HIV co-infection combination therapy
 31 March 2015 
Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes
 31 March 2015 
Hepatic fat and gallbladder polyps
 30 March 2015 
Minimally invasive approach in colorectal procedures
 30 March 2015 
Prevalence of IBD in USA residents of Indian ancestry
 30 March 2015 
Treatment of pediatric IBD
 27 March 2015 
Screening for fecal incontinence
 27 March 2015 
Deep remission in Crohn's disease
 27 March 2015 
Sexual functioning in IBD
 26 March 2015 
Antimicrobial therapy in cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 26 March 2015 
Metformin as a chemopreventive agent for Barrett's
 26 March 2015 
Survival of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Genetics and Crohn's disease
 25 March 2015 
Mortality in Barrett’s–related T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Cytomegalovirus and IBD

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us