Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 08 December 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Screening fecal calprotectin in diagnosis of IBD is effective

The latest issue of the Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of measuring fecal calprotectin in diagnosis of IBD in adults and children.

News image

The level of fecal calprotectin can predict the onset of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high accuracy and precision.

Dr Park and colleagues from California, USA evaluated the cost-effectiveness of using measurements of fecal calprotectin to identify adults and children who require endoscopic confirmation of IBD.

The researchers constructed a decision analytic tree to compare the cost-effectiveness of measuring fecal calprotectin before endoscopy examination with that of direct endoscopic evaluation alone.

A second decision analytic tree was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fecal calprotectin cutoff levels of 100 μg/g vs 50 μg/g.

Fecal calprotectin screening saved $417 per patient
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The team's primary outcome measure was the incremental cost required to avoid 1 false-negative result by using fecal calprotectin level to diagnose new-onset IBD.

In adults, fecal calprotectin screening saved $417 per patient but delayed diagnosis for 2 out of 32 patients with IBD among 100 screened patients.

In children, fecal calprotectin screening saved $300 per patient but delayed diagnosis for 5 out of 61 patients with IBD among 100 screened patients.

The team observed that if endoscopic biopsy analysis remained the standard for diagnosis, direct endoscopic evaluation would cost an additional $18,955 in adults, and $6250 in children to avoid 1 false-negative result from fecal calprotectin screening.
 
Sensitivity analyses showed that cost-effectiveness of fecal calprotectin screening varied with the sensitivity of the test, and the pre-test probability of IBD in adults and children.

The researchers found that pre-test probabilities for IBD of 75% or less in adults, and 65% or less in children made fecal calprotectin screening cost-effective.

However, it was cost-ineffective if the probabilities were 85% or more and 78% or more in adults and children, respectively.

Compared with the fecal calprotectin cutoff level of 100 μg/g, the cutoff level of 50 μg/g cost an additional $55 and $43 for adults and children, respectively.

However, the team noted that it yielded 2 and 6 additional accurate diagnoses of IBD per 100 screened adults and children, respectively.

Dr Park's team concludes, "Screening adults and children to measure fecal levels of calprotectin is effective and cost-effective in identifying those with IBD on a per-case basis when the pre-test probability is ≤75% for adults and ≤65% for children."

"The utility of the test is greater for adults than children."

"Increasing the fecal calprotectin cutoff level to ≥50 μg/g increases diagnostic accuracy without substantially increasing total cost."

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014: 12(2):  253-262.e2
24 January 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 08 December 2016 
Intestinal tuberculosis vs Crohn's disease
 08 December 2016 
Precision medicine in IBD
 08 December 2016 
Preterm birth in women with IBD
 07 December 2016 
Iron deficiency in ulcerative colitis
 07 December 2016 
IBD source of information and patient education
 07 December 2016 
End-of-rotation resident transition and in-hospital mortality
 06 December 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 06 December 2016 
Crohn's disease and thyroid cancer risk
 06 December 2016 
IBD Disability Index in restorative proctocolectomy
 05 December 2016 
Reducing hospitalization in IBD
 05 December 2016 
Disease mangement in IBD
 05 December 2016 
New biomarkers for IBD diagnosis
 02 December 2016 
Hep E in acute liver failure
 02 December 2016 
Occurrence and severity of alcoholic hepatitis
 02 December 2016 
Food antigen in active eosinophilic esophagitis
 01 December 2016 
Iron deficiency in anemic ulcerative colitis patients
 01 December 2016 
Prognostic factors after paracetamol-induced liver failure
 01 December 2016 
Factors that influence colorectal cancer screening findings
 30 November 2016 
Certolizumab pegol in Crohn's disease
 30 November 2016 
Genetic risk of Crohn's in chronic granulomatous disease
 30 November 2016 
Rifaximin in diarrhea-predominant IBS
 29 November 2016 
Assessing liver steatosis
 29 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis
 29 November 2016 
Treating Zenker's diverticulum
 28 November 2016 
Complications in celiac disease
 28 November 2016 
Monitoring IBD with mobile technology
 28 November 2016 
Reducing warfarin-related upper GI bleeds
 25 November 2016 
Metal vs plastic stents for pancreatic cancer surgery
 25 November 2016 
Yoga and IBS therapy 
 25 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening issues
 24 November 2016 
Partner burden in celiac disease
 24 November 2016 
Fusobacterium nucleatum for colorectal cancer prognosis
 24 November 2016 
PPIS and gastric cancer risk
 23 November 2016 
Quality assurance standards for colonoscopy
 23 November 2016 
Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis
 23 November 2016 
Readmissions in cirrhosis
 22 November 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea in function bowel disorder with diarrhea
 22 November 2016 
Fatigue in IBD
 22 November 2016 
PPIs and C. diff in ICU 
 21 November 2016 
Pain after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors
 21 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 21 November 2016 
Financial incentives and colorectal cancer screening
 18 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer risk and self-reported family history
 18 November 2016 
Ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease
 18 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 17 November 2016 
Liver-related specialty care in patients with Hep C
 17 November 2016 
Risk of overweight in infants
 17 November 2016 
Moderate alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 16 November 2016 
PPI therapy in liver disease
 16 November 2016 
Education in Gastroenterology fellowship
 16 November 2016 
Paternal preconceptional use of anti-TNF-α agents
 15 November 2016 
Novel treatment of NASH 
 15 November 2016 
Contraceptives and ulcerative colitis
 15 November 2016 
Physician perspectives on Hep C management
 14 November 2016 
Cardiovascular risk in NAFLD 
 14 November 2016 
Vit D and NAFLD
 14 November 2016 
Malignancy risk in IBD 
 11 November 2016 
Treatment of Hep C along with opioid agonist therapy
 11 November 2016 
Diabetes and liver cancer risk in Hep C cirrhosis
 11 November 2016 
Biomarker of cirrhosis progression

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us