Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 30 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer

This week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9.

News image

Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of patients with pancreatic cancer are needed to improve prognosis.

Dr Nicolai Schultz and colleagues from Denmark and colleagues described differences in microRNA expression in whole blood between patients with pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and healthy participants.

The research team identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9).

The team performed a case-control study that included 409 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 25 with chronic pancreatitis who had been included prospectively in the Danish BIOPAC (Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer) study (July 2008-October 2012) plus 312 blood donors as healthy participants.

The microRNA expressions in pretreatment whole blood RNA samples were collected and analyzed in 3 randomly determined subcohorts.

38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients
Journal of the American Medical Association

The discovery cohort included 143 patients with pancreatic cancer, 18 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 69 healthy participants.

The training cohort included 180 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 patient with chronic pancreatitis, and 199 healthy participants.

The validation cohort involved 86 patients with pancreatic cancer, 7 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 44 healthy participants.

The team screended 754 microRNAs in the discovery cohort, and 38 microRNAs in the training cohort, and 13 microRNAs in the validation cohort.

The research team's main outcomes included identification of microRNA panels (classifiers) for diagnosing pancreatic cancer.

The discovery cohort demonstrated that 38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients with pancreatic cancer compared with controls.

The team tested these microRNAs in the training cohort, and 2 diagnostic panels were constructed comprising 4 microRNAs in index I, and 10 in index II.

The test characteristics for the training cohort were index I area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.64.

The values for index II were an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.85.

The team found that for CA19-9, the AUC was 0.90, with a sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.99.

Performances were strengthened in the validation cohort by combining panels and CA19-9.

Compared with CA19-9 alone, the AUC for the combination of index I and CA19-9 was significantly higher.

The researchers found that the performance of the panels in patients with stage IA-IIB pancreatic cancer was index I AUC of 0.80.

Index I with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.83; index II had an AUC of 0.91, and index II with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.91.

Dr Schultz's team commented, "This study identified 2 diagnostic panels based on microRNA expression in whole blood with the potential to distinguish patients with pancreatic cancer from healthy controls."

"Further research is necessary to understand whether these have clinical implications for early detection of pancreatic cancer and how much this information adds to serum CA19-9."

JAMA 2014: 311(4)
23 January 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 30 September 2016 
Gluten breakdown and immunogenicity in celiac disease
 30 September 2016 
Noninvasive detection of NASH
 30 September 2016 
CEA levels to detect recurrent colorectal cancer
 29 September 2016 
Biologic therapies in IBD
 29 September 2016 
Predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer
 29 September 2016 
Predicting symptomatic outcomes in GERD
 28 September 2016 
Hep C virus RNA in liver explants
 28 September 2016 
Global trends in pancreatic cancer mortality
 28 September 2016 
Heterogeneity in endoscopic treatment of Crohn’s
 27 September 2016 
Non-invasive tests of NAFLD
 27 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation for C.diff in IBD
 27 September 2016 
Fast-track colorectal surgery influences outcomes
 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us