Help
Subscribe


All of GastroHep is now free access! - Click here to register Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer

This week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9.

News image

Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of patients with pancreatic cancer are needed to improve prognosis.

Dr Nicolai Schultz and colleagues from Denmark and colleagues described differences in microRNA expression in whole blood between patients with pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and healthy participants.

The research team identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9).

The team performed a case-control study that included 409 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 25 with chronic pancreatitis who had been included prospectively in the Danish BIOPAC (Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer) study (July 2008-October 2012) plus 312 blood donors as healthy participants.

The microRNA expressions in pretreatment whole blood RNA samples were collected and analyzed in 3 randomly determined subcohorts.

38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients
Journal of the American Medical Association

The discovery cohort included 143 patients with pancreatic cancer, 18 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 69 healthy participants.

The training cohort included 180 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 patient with chronic pancreatitis, and 199 healthy participants.

The validation cohort involved 86 patients with pancreatic cancer, 7 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 44 healthy participants.

The team screended 754 microRNAs in the discovery cohort, and 38 microRNAs in the training cohort, and 13 microRNAs in the validation cohort.

The research team's main outcomes included identification of microRNA panels (classifiers) for diagnosing pancreatic cancer.

The discovery cohort demonstrated that 38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients with pancreatic cancer compared with controls.

The team tested these microRNAs in the training cohort, and 2 diagnostic panels were constructed comprising 4 microRNAs in index I, and 10 in index II.

The test characteristics for the training cohort were index I area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.64.

The values for index II were an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.85.

The team found that for CA19-9, the AUC was 0.90, with a sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.99.

Performances were strengthened in the validation cohort by combining panels and CA19-9.

Compared with CA19-9 alone, the AUC for the combination of index I and CA19-9 was significantly higher.

The researchers found that the performance of the panels in patients with stage IA-IIB pancreatic cancer was index I AUC of 0.80.

Index I with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.83; index II had an AUC of 0.91, and index II with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.91.

Dr Schultz's team commented, "This study identified 2 diagnostic panels based on microRNA expression in whole blood with the potential to distinguish patients with pancreatic cancer from healthy controls."

"Further research is necessary to understand whether these have clinical implications for early detection of pancreatic cancer and how much this information adds to serum CA19-9."

JAMA 2014: 311(4)
23 January 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 04 July 2015

Advanced search
 03 July 2015 
Tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency
 03 July 2015 
Aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography
 03 July 2015 
Extracolonic pathologies in colorectal cancer
 02 July 2015 
Ulcerative colitis prognosis after thiopurines withdrawal
 02 July 2015 
Health care use by IBD children
 02 July 2015 
Anastomotic leak and cancer cancer
 01 July 2015 
Oral mechanical bowel preparation
 01 July 2015 
Missed gastric cancers
 01 July 2015 
Probiotics in IBD
 30 June 2015 
Split-dose preparations vs day-before bowel cleansing regimens
 30 June 2015 
Glucocorticoids and peptic ulcer bleeding
 30 June 2015 
NSAIDs and hearburn symptoms
 29 June 2015 
Prevention of pancreatitis after ERCP
 29 June 2015 
Advances in autoimmune pancreatitis
 29 June 2015 
Rescue therapy in ulcerative colitis
 26 June 2015 

Gene polymorphism in alcoholic liver disease

 26 June 2015 
Dietary fibre–microbiota interactions
 26 June 2015 
Gastritis in celiac disease
 25 June 2015 
Persistent organ failure in acute cholangitis patients
 25 June 2015 
Vitamin D level and primary biliary cirrhosis
 25 June 2015 
Fecal microbiota in pediatric IBD
 24 June 2015 
Fatigue scales for IBD
 24 June 2015 
Mucosal healing tests in ulcerative colitis
 24 June 2015 
Environmental risk in IBD
 23 June 2015 
Marker associated with endoscopic lesion in Crohn's
 23 June 2015 
Body composition in children with IBD
 23 June 2015 
Medical vs nurse endoscopists
 22 June 2015 
Gene polymorphism associated with increased liver enzymes
 22 June 2015 
Treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis
 22 June 2015 
Solid organ cancers after liver transplant
 19 June 2015 
Causes of death in HBV
 19 June 2015 
Lifetime benefits of increased adenoma detection rates
 19 June 2015 
Acid-suppressive therapy before anti-reflux surgery
 18 June 2015 
Risk for dyspepsia
 18 June 2015 
Endoscopic activity in symptomatic IBD patients
 18 June 2015 
Regimens for H. pylori eradication
 17 June 2015 
NAFLD risk in celiac disease
 17 June 2015 
Non-invasive markers of advanced liver fibrosis
 17 June 2015 
Patients’ and clinicians’ perception of pouch dysfunction
 16 June 2015 
Risk score for hepatocellular carcinoma screening
 16 June 2015 
Esophageal food bolus impaction
 16 June 2015 
Evaluating lymph node metastasis for rectal cancer
 15 June 2015 
Low-cost colonoscopy training
 15 June 2015 
Determining dysbiosis in IBS or IBD
 15 June 2015 
Light alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 12 June 2015 
Smoking and disease course in IBD
 12 June 2015 
Hep D in a Hep B endemic area
 12 June 2015 
Patient-orientated internet information in ulcerative colitis
 11 June 2015 
Physical inactivity and NAFLD
 11 June 2015 
Esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection
 11 June 2015 
Guideline based screening strategies for hepatitis
 10 June 2015 
Cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in liver disease
 10 June 2015 
Abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer
 10 June 2015 
Pediatric chronic Hep C
 09 June 2015 
Bile acid malabsorption in IBS
 09 June 2015 
Racial differences in celiac disease
 09 June 2015 
Conversion from laparoscopic to open colorectal cancer resection
 08 June 2015 
Short sleep duration and NAFLD
 08 June 2015 
Heritability in inflammatory bowel disease
 08 June 2015 
Eosinophilic esophagitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us