Help
Subscribe


All of GastroHep is now free access! - Click here to register Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer

This week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9.

News image

Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of patients with pancreatic cancer are needed to improve prognosis.

Dr Nicolai Schultz and colleagues from Denmark and colleagues described differences in microRNA expression in whole blood between patients with pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and healthy participants.

The research team identified panels of microRNAs for use in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9).

The team performed a case-control study that included 409 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 25 with chronic pancreatitis who had been included prospectively in the Danish BIOPAC (Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer) study (July 2008-October 2012) plus 312 blood donors as healthy participants.

The microRNA expressions in pretreatment whole blood RNA samples were collected and analyzed in 3 randomly determined subcohorts.

38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients
Journal of the American Medical Association

The discovery cohort included 143 patients with pancreatic cancer, 18 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 69 healthy participants.

The training cohort included 180 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 patient with chronic pancreatitis, and 199 healthy participants.

The validation cohort involved 86 patients with pancreatic cancer, 7 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 44 healthy participants.

The team screended 754 microRNAs in the discovery cohort, and 38 microRNAs in the training cohort, and 13 microRNAs in the validation cohort.

The research team's main outcomes included identification of microRNA panels (classifiers) for diagnosing pancreatic cancer.

The discovery cohort demonstrated that 38 microRNAs in whole blood were significantly dysregulated in patients with pancreatic cancer compared with controls.

The team tested these microRNAs in the training cohort, and 2 diagnostic panels were constructed comprising 4 microRNAs in index I, and 10 in index II.

The test characteristics for the training cohort were index I area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.64.

The values for index II were an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.85.

The team found that for CA19-9, the AUC was 0.90, with a sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.99.

Performances were strengthened in the validation cohort by combining panels and CA19-9.

Compared with CA19-9 alone, the AUC for the combination of index I and CA19-9 was significantly higher.

The researchers found that the performance of the panels in patients with stage IA-IIB pancreatic cancer was index I AUC of 0.80.

Index I with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.83; index II had an AUC of 0.91, and index II with CA19-9 had an AUC of 0.91.

Dr Schultz's team commented, "This study identified 2 diagnostic panels based on microRNA expression in whole blood with the potential to distinguish patients with pancreatic cancer from healthy controls."

"Further research is necessary to understand whether these have clinical implications for early detection of pancreatic cancer and how much this information adds to serum CA19-9."

JAMA 2014: 311(4)
23 January 2014

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 31 March 2015

Advanced search
 31 March 2015 
HCV-HIV co-infection combination therapy
 31 March 2015 
Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes
 31 March 2015 
Hepatic fat and gallbladder polyps
 30 March 2015 
Minimally invasive approach in colorectal procedures
 30 March 2015 
Prevalence of IBD in USA residents of Indian ancestry
 30 March 2015 
Treatment of pediatric IBD
 27 March 2015 
Screening for fecal incontinence
 27 March 2015 
Deep remission in Crohn's disease
 27 March 2015 
Sexual functioning in IBD
 26 March 2015 
Antimicrobial therapy in cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 26 March 2015 
Metformin as a chemopreventive agent for Barrett's
 26 March 2015 
Survival of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Genetics and Crohn's disease
 25 March 2015 
Mortality in Barrett’s–related T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Cytomegalovirus and IBD
 24 March 2015 
Prevention of colorectal cancer after screening
 24 March 2015 
Functional GI disorders and body mass index
 24 March 2015 
Quality of life in children with fecal incontinence
 23 March 2015 
Fibrosis in NAFLD vs NASH
 23 March 2015 
The unmasking of Whipple's disease
 23 March 2015 
Predicting the quality of colon cancer care
 20 March 2015 
Interventions for eosinophilic esophagitis
 20 March 2015 
Screening for Barrett's esophagus
 20 March 2015 
Colorectal cancer risk and genetic variants
 19 March 2015 
Dedicated care for diverticular disease
 19 March 2015 
Hypnotherapy for IBS
 19 March 2015 
Poor mental and physical health in HCV
 18 March 2015 
Practice guidelines for colorectal polyps
 18 March 2015 
Out-of-hours endoscopy for upper GI bleeding
 18 March 2015 
H. pylori eradication and lipids
 17 March 2015 
H. pylori test-and-treat program and gastric cancer
 17 March 2015 
Adalimumab in Crohn’s disease
 17 March 2015 

Low-dose PPIs and GI bleeding in patients receiving aspirin

 16 March 2015 
Microscopic colitis
 16 March 2015 
Cholestasis of pregnancy with HCV
 16 March 2015 
Hybrid therapy for H. pylori
 13 March 2015 
Medicare patients and payments to gastroenterologists
 13 March 2015 
Appendectomy in ulcerative colitis
 13 March 2015 

Racial disparities in gluten-sensitive problems

 12 March 2015 
Predicting IBD in IBS patients
 12 March 2015 
Patient knowledge of IBS
 12 March 2015 
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity
 11 March 2015 

Prediction of malignant bile duct obstruction

 11 March 2015 
NAFLD–related hepatocellular carcinoma
 11 March 2015 
Assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis
 10 March 2015 
Risk for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms
 10 March 2015 
Poor disease course in pediatric ulcerative colitis
 10 March 2015 
Outcomes in Crohn's therapy
 09 March 2015 
Fibre usage in ulcerative colitis in remission
 09 March 2015 
Risk of C. difficile upon hospital admission
 09 March 2015 
Gastric Cancer detection during GI endosocopy
 06 March 2015 
Steroid therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis
 06 March 2015 
Second anti-TNF in IBD
 06 March 2015 
Efficacy of Hep E vaccine
 05 March 2015 
EPHXI polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk
 05 March 2015 
Infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy in ulcerative colitis
 05 March 2015 
Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon and rectum
 04 March 2015 
Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer
 04 March 2015 
Management of IBD
 04 March 2015 
Progression of Barrett's

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us