Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 01 October 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Intraprocedural quality in ERCP

This month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology reviews intraprocedural quality in ERCP.

News image

In 2006, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)/the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy published quality indicators for the major gastrointestinal procedures.

Dr Anthony DeBenedet and colleagues from Michigan, USA used the published literature to assess current endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) intraprocedural performance, and compared it to the targets set by the ACG/ASGE taskforce.

The team's secondary aim was to determine whether performance varies across different health-care settings, study designs, and trainee participation.

A PubMed and EMBASE literature search from 2006 to 2013 was conducted.

Articles were selected based on title, abstract, full text, and reporting of success rates for the intraprocedural quality indicators.

Weighted bile duct cannulation success rate was 89%
American Journal of Gastroenterology

The team collected success rates, represented as numerical proportions, from each study.

For each success rate, a standard error and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.

A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to weight each study, and a cumulative, weighted success rate (or effect size) for each indicator was determined.

The research team found that random-effects meta-regression was then used to examine the impact of study setting, design, and trainee involvement on each quality indicator.

A total of 8,005 articles were initially retrieved.

Following the application of predefined criteria, the team found 52 articles remained.

The cumulative, weighted bile duct cannulation success rate was 89%.

The research team found that pancreatic duct cannulation was 85%, precut utilization rate was 11%, common bile duct stone extraction rate was 88%, and the rate of successful biliary stenting below the common bile duct bifurcation was 98%.

Subgroup analysis with meta-regression showed no statistically significant differences between academic and community settings, prospective and retrospective study designs, and trainee participation on success across bile duct cannulation, precut utilization, and common bile duct stone extraction.

Dr DeBenedet's team concludes, "ERCP intraprocedural quality is in good standing."

"On the basis of this analysis, the two targets that could be potentially revised are precut utilization and biliary stenting."

"This analysis was confined to the published literature and therefore, in general, reflects the ERCP performance of institutions, primarily academic, that are conducting clinical research."

"Thus, it is difficult to generalize this performance assessment to the broader ERCP community as a whole."

Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:1696–1704
15 November 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 30 September 2016 
Gluten breakdown and immunogenicity in celiac disease
 30 September 2016 
Noninvasive detection of NASH
 30 September 2016 
CEA levels to detect recurrent colorectal cancer
 29 September 2016 
Biologic therapies in IBD
 29 September 2016 
Predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer
 29 September 2016 
Predicting symptomatic outcomes in GERD
 28 September 2016 
Hep C virus RNA in liver explants
 28 September 2016 
Global trends in pancreatic cancer mortality
 28 September 2016 
Heterogeneity in endoscopic treatment of Crohn’s
 27 September 2016 
Non-invasive tests of NAFLD
 27 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation for C.diff in IBD
 27 September 2016 
Fast-track colorectal surgery influences outcomes
 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us