Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 01 July 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Birth cohort testing and treatment for HCV in the USA

July's issue of Hepatology investigates the impact of timing and prioritization on the cost-effectiveness of birth cohort testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus in the United States.

News image

Recent United States guidelines recommend one-time birth cohort testing for hepatitis C infection in persons born between 1945 and 1965.

This represents a major public health policy undertaking.

Dr Phil McEwan and colleagues from the United Kingdom assessed the role of treatment timing and prioritization on predicted cost-effectiveness.

The team used a MONARCH hepatitis C lifetime simulation model in conjunction with a testing and treatment decision tree to estimate the cost-effectiveness of birth cohort versus risk-based testing incorporating information on age, fibrosis stage and treatment timing.

The study used a 1945-1965 birth cohort and included disease progression, testing and treatment-related parameters.

Scenario analysis was used to evaluate the impact of hepatitis C virus prevalence, treatment eligibility, age, fibrosis stage and timing of treatment initiation on total costs, quality-adjusted life years, hepatitis C virus-related complications and cost-effectiveness.

Prioritizing treatment was associated with a decrease in a total cost of $7.5 billion
Hepatology

The researchers found the cost-effectiveness of birth cohort versus risk-based testing was $28,602.

Assuming 91% of the population is tested, at least 278,000 people need to be treated for birth cohort testing to maintain cost-effectiveness.

The team noted that prioritizing treatment toward those with more advanced fibrosis is associated with a decrease in a total cost of $7.5 billion, and 59,035 fewer hepatitis C virus-related complications.

Total quality-adjusted life years and complications avoided are maximized when treatment initiation occurs as soon as possible after testing.

Dr McEwan's team comments, "This study confirms that birth cohort testing is, on average, cost-effective."

"However, this remains true only when enough tested and hepatitis C virus-positive subjects are treated to generate sufficient cost offsets and quality-adjusted life years gains."

"Given the practical and financial challenges associated with implementing birth cohort testing, the greatest return on investment is obtained when eligible patients are treated immediately and those with more advanced disease are prioritized."

Hepatology 2013: 58(1): (54–64)
22 July 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 01 July 2016 
Aspirin and colorectal cancer
 01 July 2016 
Outcome measures in celiac disease
 01 July 2016 
Growth factor activity and IBD
 30 June 2016 
Staging system for familial adenomatous polyposis
 30 June 2016 
Antibiotics in children and obesity
 30 June 2016 
IBS-type symptoms in pediatric IBD
 29 June 2016 
Hep C eradication in people who inject drugs
 29 June 2016 
Anti-tumor necrosis factor in mothers and newborns
 29 June 2016 
Progression to esophageal carcinoma in Barrett's
 28 June 2016 
Gastric cancer screening in the USA
 28 June 2016 
Acute severe ulcerative colitis
 28 June 2016 
Cancer recurrence after immune-suppressive therapies
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us