Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 09 February 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Endoscopic ultrasound in suspected biliary obstruction influences ERCP burden in real clinical practice

A study in this month's issue of the European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology reports on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in suspected biliary obstruction and its impact on ERCP burden in real clinical practice.

News image

Performing endoscopic ultrasound before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been described to be useful in cases of suspected biliary obstruction where endoscopic ultrasound can triage patients for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Dr Zaheer Abdula and colleagues determined the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and its impact on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography burden in real clinical practice.

The research team evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound+endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a single endoscopic session.

The team evaluated 418 consecutive patients with suspected but unexplained biliary obstruction referred for endoscopic ultrasound before possible endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

The research team team determined the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and its value in predicting the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Endoscopic ultrasound established whether pancreaticobiliary disorder was present, and whether therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was required.

Endoscopic ultrasound showed pathology in 42% who had a nondilated biliary system
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

These decisions were matched with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings, histology, clinical course, and follow-up.

Where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was indicated, it was performed in the same endoscopic session.

Endoscopic ultrasound was performed in 412 out of 418 patients, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was considered necessary in 64%.

The research team noted that the single-session endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was safe and effective.

The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound included 99% in choledocholithiasis, 90% with malignant strictures, and 92% with benign strictures.

The research team reported that endoscopic ultrasound showed pathology in 42% of patients who had a nondilated biliary system at initial investigations.

When endoscopic ultrasound indicated a normal common bile duct, this had a 100% positive predictive value for non-necessity for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

The median overall follow-up period was 12 months.

Dr Abdula's team commented, "Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in this mixed group of pancreaticobiliary disorder."

"This accurately guided endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography need and avoided unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 36%."

"endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the same endoscopic session for the evaluation and management of PBD is technically feasible, with safety and efficacy profiles equivalent to that of each procedure performed independently in different sessions."

Eur J of Gastroenterol & Hepatology: 2013: (25)7 :850-857
21 June 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 09 February 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and parental allergies
 09 February 2016 
Cancer-specific prognosis in octogenarians with colorectal cancer
 09 February 2016 
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy screening
 08 February 2016 
Immunity in the human gut
 08 February 2016 
Cancelled colonoscopy appointments
 08 February 2016 
Cognitive function in Crohn's disease
 05 February 2016 
Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia
 05 February 2016 
Treatment for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn’s colitis
 05 February 2016 
Methotrexate and remission in ulcerative colitis
 04 February 2016 
Diabetes and liver cancer
 04 February 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening
 04 February 2016 
H. pylori and coronary heart disease 
 03 February 2016 
Acute diverticulitis and IBS 
 03 February 2016 
Microbiota of the colonic mucosa and chronic constipation
 03 February 2016 
Guidelines for chronic pancreatitis
 02 February 2016 
Ramosetron and IBS-diarrhea
 02 February 2016 
IBD emergency department visits
 02 February 2016 
Probiotics for H. pylori management
 01 February 2016 
Managing HBV in pregnancy
 01 February 2016 
Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma risk
 01 February 2016 
Depressive symptoms in IBD 
 29 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after colonoscopy
 29 January 2016 
Acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients
 29 January 2016 
Vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk
 28 January 2016 
Tissue anti-TNF drug levels and IBD
 28 January 2016 
First line treatment of H. pylori infection
 28 January 2016 
Tetracycline for rosacea increases the risk of IBD
 27 January 2016 
Steroids in children with Crohn's
 27 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program 
 27 January 2016 
Human gut microbiome in IBD 
 26 January 2016 
Smoking and symptomatic diverticular disease
 26 January 2016 
Step-down therapy in PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia 
 26 January 2016 
Diet and IBD risk
 25 January 2016 
IBD monitoring using smartphones
 25 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program
 25 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after a negative screening sigmoidoscopy
 22 January 2016 
Length of Barrett's and cancer
 22 January 2016 
Psychosocial interventions and alcohol abstinence in chronic liver disease
 22 January 2016 
Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance
 21 January 2016 
Increasing adenoma detection rate during colonoscope withdrawal
 21 January 2016 
Microscopic colitis current concepts
 21 January 2016 
Statins as a management strategy for constipation 
 20 January 2016 
Health status after bariatric surgery
 20 January 2016 
Hep E infection in West Africa
 20 January 2016 
Preventing endoscopic bacterial transmission
 19 January 2016 
PPIs and phlebotomy in hereditary hemochromatosis
 19 January 2016 
Predicting liver cirrhosis in Hep C
 19 January 2016 
Frozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation
 18 January 2016 
Hospitalization for diverticulitis in the USA
 18 January 2016 
H. pylori and gastric cancer across Europe
 18 January 2016 
Enteral nutrition in children with Crohn's
 15 January 2016 
Alcohol- and HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 January 2016 
Recurrent colonic diverticulitis
 15 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk
 14 January 2016 
Risk stratification of incidentally discovered gallstones
 14 January 2016 
Treatment of refractory cholestatic pruritus
 14 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk 
 13 January 2016 
C-section delivery and IBD risk
 13 January 2016 
Primary biliary cholangitis treatment with incomplete UDCA response
 13 January 2016 
Colon cancer screening rates 

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us