Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 06 December 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Expert vs nonexpert performance in minimally invasive surgery

A study in this month's issue of Surgical Endoscopy investigates psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery.

News image

A high level of psychomotor skills is required to perform minimally invasive surgery safely.

To assure high quality of skills, it is important to be able to measure and assess these skills.

Dr Erlend Fagertun Hofstad and colleagues determined aspects that indicate the difference between performances at various levels of proficiency.

Measurement and assessment of skills in minimally invasive surgery are best done in an automatic and objective way.

The research team assessed that the goal of this study was to investigate a set of 9 motion-related metrics for their relevance to assess psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery during the performance of a labyrinth task.

The team divided 32 surgeons and medical students into 3 groups according to their level of experience in minimally invasive surgery, including those that were experts, intermediates, and novices.

The participants performed the labyrinth task in the D-box Basic simulator.

The researchers reported that he task required bimanual maneuvering and threading a needle through a labyrinth of 10 holes.

9 motion-related metrics were used to assess minimally invasive surgery skills
Surgical Endoscopy

The team used 9 motion-related metrics to assess the minimally invasive surgery skills of each participant.

The team of doctors noted that experts and intermediates performed significantly better than the novices in terms of time and parameters measuring the amount of instrument movement.

The experts had significantly better bimanual dexterity, which indicated that they made more simultaneous movements of the 2 instruments compared to the intermediates and novices.

The research team reported that the experts also performed the task with a shorter instrument path length with the nondominant hand than the intermediates.

Dr Hofstad's team concludes, "The surgeonís performance in minimally invasive surgery can be distinguished from a novice by metrics such as time and path length."

"An experienced surgeon in minimally invasive surgery can be differentiated from a less experienced one by the higher ability to control the instrument in the nondominant hand and the higher degree of simultaneous (coordinated) movements of the 2 instruments."

Surgical Endoscopy 2013: 27(3): 854-863
29 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 06 December 2016 
IBD Disability Index in restorative proctocolectomy
 06 December 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 06 December 2016 
Crohn's disease and thyroid cancer risk
 05 December 2016 
Disease mangement in IBD
 05 December 2016 
New biomarkers for IBD diagnosis
 05 December 2016 
Reducing hospitalization in IBD
 02 December 2016 
Hep E in acute liver failure
 02 December 2016 
Occurrence and severity of alcoholic hepatitis
 02 December 2016 
Food antigen in active eosinophilic esophagitis
 01 December 2016 
Iron deficiency in anemic ulcerative colitis patients
 01 December 2016 
Prognostic factors after paracetamol-induced liver failure
 01 December 2016 
Factors that influence colorectal cancer screening findings
 30 November 2016 
Certolizumab pegol in Crohn's disease
 30 November 2016 
Genetic risk of Crohn's in chronic granulomatous disease
 30 November 2016 
Rifaximin in diarrhea-predominant IBS
 29 November 2016 
Assessing liver steatosis
 29 November 2016 
Treating Zenker's diverticulum
 29 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis
 28 November 2016 
Complications in celiac disease
 28 November 2016 
Monitoring IBD with mobile technology
 28 November 2016 
Reducing warfarin-related upper GI bleeds
 25 November 2016 
Metal vs plastic stents for pancreatic cancer surgery
 25 November 2016 
Yoga and IBS therapy 
 25 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening issues
 24 November 2016 
Partner burden in celiac disease
 24 November 2016 
Fusobacterium nucleatum for colorectal cancer prognosis
 24 November 2016 
PPIS and gastric cancer risk
 23 November 2016 
Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis
 23 November 2016 
Readmissions in cirrhosis
 23 November 2016 
Quality assurance standards for colonoscopy
 22 November 2016 
Fatigue in IBD
 22 November 2016 
PPIs and C. diff in ICU 
 22 November 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea in function bowel disorder with diarrhea
 21 November 2016 
Financial incentives and colorectal cancer screening
 21 November 2016 
Pain after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors
 21 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 18 November 2016 
Colorectal cancer risk and self-reported family history
 18 November 2016 
Ustekinumab in Crohnís disease
 18 November 2016 
Antivirals and chemotherapy in Hep C patients with cancer
 17 November 2016 
Risk of overweight in infants
 17 November 2016 
Moderate alcohol consumption and NAFLD
 17 November 2016 
Liver-related specialty care in patients with Hep C
 16 November 2016 
PPI therapy in liver disease
 16 November 2016 
Education in Gastroenterology fellowship
 16 November 2016 
Paternal preconceptional use of anti-TNF-α agents
 15 November 2016 
Novel treatment of NASH 
 15 November 2016 
Physician perspectives on Hep C management
 15 November 2016 
Contraceptives and ulcerative colitis
 14 November 2016 
Cardiovascular risk in NAFLD 
 14 November 2016 
Vit D and NAFLD
 14 November 2016 
Malignancy risk in IBD 
 11 November 2016 
Treatment of Hep C along with opioid agonist therapy
 11 November 2016 
Diabetes and liver cancer risk in Hep C cirrhosis
 11 November 2016 
Biomarker of cirrhosis progression
 10 November 2016 
Testosterone levels and cirrhosis outcomes in men
 10 November 2016 
Improving bowel quality before colonoscopy
 10 November 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI episodes
 09 November 2016 
Minimizing costs of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy
 09 November 2016 
Risk of TB in IBD patients receiving therapy
 09 November 2016 
Liver transplant wait-list and mortality in infants

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us