Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 26 May 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Gastroesophageal flap valve grade correlates with surgery rate in GERD

The latest issue of Surgical Endoscopy investigates the correlation of the gastroesophageal flap valve grade with the surgery rate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

News image

The importance of endoscopic evaluation and grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was previously demonstrated with increased acid exposure and high grades of esophagitis in those with high-grade valves.

On the other hand, no data exist on the relationship between gastroesophageal flap valve appearance and surgical rate.

Dr Huseyin Ayhan Kayaoglu and colleagues reported that for 453 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroesophageal flap valve grading and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring were performed.

Surgery was performed for 82 of these patients who failed medical management or had disease complications.

The research team noted that the gastroesophageal flap valve grade 4 patients were younger than the patients with normal gastroesophageal flap valve, and 2 and showed significant male predominance.

5% of the grade 2 patients underwent surgery
Surgical Endoscopy

The prevalence of hiatal hernia, the degree of esophageal acid exposure, and the prevalence and degree of erosive esophagitis significantly increased with gastroesophageal flap valve grade.

The doctors examined that no gastroesophageal flap valve grade 1 patients underwent surgery compared with 5% of the grade 2 patients, 21% of the grade 3 patients, and 64% of the grade 4 patients who had surgery for various indications.

Dr Kayaoglu's team commented, "Esophagogastric opening estimated by endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve was strongly correlated with surgery rate in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients."

"In particular, patients with grade 4 valves showed the highest rates of erosive esophagitis and axial hiatal hernia and frequently underwent surgery for either failed medical management or disease complications."

Surgical Endoscopy 2013: 27(3): 801-807
02 April 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 26 May 2016 
Direct-acting antivirals in Hep C cirrhosis
 26 May 2016 
Education booklet for colonoscopy bowel preparation
 26 May 2016 
Uncomplicated diverticulitis in outpatients
 25 May 2016 
Recurrence of Barrett’s after successful endoscopic therapy
 25 May 2016 
Preventing NSAID-associated GI toxicity
 25 May 2016 
PPIs and NSAID-induced small bowel injury
 24 May 2016 
Fecal inflammatory markers in Crohn's
 24 May 2016 
Depression and IBD recurrence
 24 May 2016 
New therapies for NASH
 23 May 2016 
Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding outcomes
 23 May 2016 
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
 23 May 2016 
Cancer after colectomy in IBD
 20 May 2016 
Biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis
 20 May 2016 
Prognostic score for hepatic venous outflow obstruction
 20 May 2016 
Treatment for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
 19 May 2016 
Probiotics and H. pylori eradication
 19 May 2016 
Impaired skeletal health in atrophic gastritis
 19 May 2016 
Predicting outcome in ulcerative colitis
 18 May 2016 
Erectile dysfunction in IBD
 18 May 2016 
Surgical fundoplication for GERD 
 18 May 2016 
Acute GERD and esophageal histologic changes
 17 May 2016 
Vitamin D level and clinical status in IBD 
 17 May 2016 
Mucosal dysbiosis in Crohn's disease
 17 May 2016 
Inpatient costs for IBD and acute pancreatitis
 16 May 2016 
Outcomes of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers
 16 May 2016 
C. difficile in ulcerative colitis patients
 16 May 2016 
Therapy for Crohn's in a Medicaid population
 13 May 2016 
Parkinson's disease and IBD
 13 May 2016 
Non-traditional heart disease risk factors in NAFLD
 13 May 2016 
Inactivated oral cholera vaccine
 12 May 2016 
Gestational diabetes mellitus and NAFLD
 12 May 2016 
Impact of Crohn's in the USA
 12 May 2016 
Ozanimod induction and ulcerative colitis
 11 May 2016 
Anti-TNF discontinuation in IBD
 11 May 2016 
Age and disease presentation with Crohn's disease
 11 May 2016 
Prognosis after colorectal cancer resection
 10 May 2016 
Gluten-free diet in patients with IBS-diarrhea
 10 May 2016 
Noninvasive test for IBD
 10 May 2016 
Digital health for gastroenterology
 09 May 2016 
Diarrheal infections in adults
 09 May 2016 
Quality improvement initiative and readmission for cirrhosis
 09 May 2016 
Coffee or tea and the risk of Barrett's
 06 May 2016 
Risk factors in peptic ulcer bleeding
 06 May 2016 
Recurrent pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis
 06 May 2016 
Managing acute lower GI bleeding
 05 May 2016 
Chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer
 05 May 2016 
Genetics in early-early-onset IBD
 05 May 2016 
Reductions in quality of screening colonoscopies
 04 May 2016 
Anti-TNF therapy for IBD
 04 May 2016 
Bismuth and H. pylori eradication
 04 May 2016 
Chromoendoscopy vs colonoscopy for dysplasia in colitis
 03 May 2016 
Surgery vs medical therapy for GERD
 03 May 2016 
Vedolizumab for IBD
 03 May 2016 
PPIs and gut microbiota
 02 May 2016 
Genetic variant that increase NAFLD risk
 02 May 2016 
Resection of colorectal polyps
 02 May 2016 
Mycophenolate mofetil as first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis
 29 April 2016 
Crohn's disease associated genes
 29 April 2016 
Simvastatins and survival in cirrhosis
 29 April 2016 
HCV infection in Baby Boomers with Medicare

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us