Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 26 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography

The latest issue of Hepatology determines reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography.

News image

Liver stiffness evaluation is usually considered as reliable when it fulfills criteria of having 10 or more valid measurements, 60% or more success rate, and interquartile range / median ratio (IQR/M) of 0.30 or less.

However, such reliable liver stiffness evaluation have never been shown to be more accurate than unreliable liver stiffness evaluation.

Dr Jérôme Boursier and colleagues evaluated the relevance of the usual definition for LSE reliability, and improved reliability by using diagnostic accuracy as a primary outcome in a large population.

The team included 1,165 patients with chronic liver disease from 19 French centers.

All patients had liver biopsy and liver stiffness evaluation.

Well-classified patients for the diagnosis of cirrhosis was 90% for the 'very reliable group'
Hepatology

The research team noted that 76% of liver stiffness evaluation were reliable according to the usual definition.

However, these reliable liver stiffness evaluation were not significantly more accurate than unreliable liver stiffness evaluation.

In multivariate analyses with different diagnostic targets, liver stiffness evaluation median and IQR/M were independent predictors of fibrosis staging, with no significant influence of 10 or more valid measurements, or liver stiffness evaluation success rate.

These 2 reliability criteria determined 3 liver stiffness evaluation groups, including 'very reliable', 'reliable',  and 'poorly reliable'.

The team found that rates of well-classified patients for the diagnosis of cirrhosis were, respectively, 90%, 86%, and 70%.

According to these new reliability criteria, 9% of liver stiffness evaluation were poorly reliable, 74% were reliable, and 17% were very reliable.

Dr Boursier's team concludes, "The usual definition for liver stiffness evaluation reliability is not relevant."

"Liver stiffness evaluation reliability depends on IQR/M according to liver stiffness median level, defining thus 3 reliability categories, including very reliable, reliable, and poorly reliable liver stiffness evaluation."

Hepatology 2013: 57(3): 1182–1191
25 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 26 September 2016 
Preventing cirrhosis in Hep C with fibrosis
 26 September 2016 
Body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
 26 September 2016 
Gastric cancer risk in intestinal metaplasia of the stomach
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer
 02 September 2016 
Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and GERD 
 02 September 2016 
Postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum
 02 September 2016 
Postop recurrence of Crohn's
 01 September 2016 
Prognostic test for liver transplants
 01 September 2016 
Recovery after colorectal surgery in elderly patients
 01 September 2016 
Obesity and post-ERCP pancreatitis
 30 August 2016 
NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis
 30 August 2016 
Quality improvement program after colorectal surgery
 30 August 2016 
Gut microbial diversity in smokers with Crohn's
 29 August 2016 
Reducing Hep B-related HCC
 29 August 2016 
Hep B immunization of infants for liver cancer
 29 August 2016 
Risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us