Help
Subscribe


Submit Videos to GastroHep Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Optimum bowel cleansing before colonoscopy

This month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology examines a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy.

News image

Optimal bowel preparation is vital for the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy.

The inconvenience, discomfort, required consumption of large volumes of product, and potential adverse effects associated with some bowel preparations deter patients from colonoscopy, and may provide inadequate cleansing.

A dual-action, non-phosphate, natural orange-flavored, low-volume preparation containing sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (P/MC) is being reviewed for bowel cleansing.

Dr Philip Katz and colleagues from Pennsylvania, USA reported that this was a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blinded, prespecified non-inferiority, head-to-head study.

The team investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of day-before administration of picosulfate and magnesium citrate vs 2L polyethylene glycol solution, and 2 5-mg bisacodyl tablets in adult patients preparing for colonoscopy.

The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of picosulfate and magnesium citrate to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall colon cleansing using a modified Aronchick scale.

The doctors also evaluated the efficacy in the ascending, mid, and recto-sigmoid segments of colon using a modified Ottawa scale.

Patient acceptability and tolerability of the bowel preparations were assessed via a standard questionnaire.

Adverse events related to the bowel preparation were reported by 1% of patients
American Journal of Gastroenterology

The research team assessed safety based on the monitoring of adverse events and meaningful findings on clinical evaluations including physical examinations, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiograms.

A total of 603 patients were randomized to receive either picosulfate and magnesium citrate or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

The team of doctors noted that based on the Aronchick scale, successful overall cleansing was similar in patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate.

Patients receiving 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets picosulfate and magnesium citrate demonstrated non-inferiority to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall cleansing of the colon, as measured by the Aronchick scale.

Similarly, the efficacy of picosulfate and magnesium citrate , as measured by the Ottawa scale, was non-inferior to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in cleansing the ascending, mid, and recto-sigmoid segments of the colon.

The researchers noted that patient-reported acceptability and tolerability for each item examined on the questionnaire was significantly greater for picosulfate and magnesium citrate compared with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

Treatment-emergent adverse events related to the bowel preparation reported by 1% of patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets were nausea, vomiting, and headache.

No clinically meaningful changes were noted in either treatment arm in data collected from physical examinations, vital sign measurements, and ECGs.

Dr Katz's team commented "When administered as a day-before dose, the bowel cleansing effects of picosulfate and magnesium citrate were non-inferior compared with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets using the clinician-rated Aronchick and Ottawa scales."

"Treatment acceptability was significantly more favorable in patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate  than in patients receiving 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets."

Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 401409
20 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 27 April 2015

Advanced search
 24 April 2015 
GastroHep.com Easter break
 23 April 2015 
Gut microbiota modulation for alcoholic liver disease
 23 April 2015 
Moderate sodium restriction diet in cirrhosis
 23 April 2015 
Gastroesophageal junction disruption and obesity
 22 April 2015 
Hepatitis and mortality in hospitalized patients
 22 April 2015 
Magnetic sphincter augmentation for GERD
 22 April 2015 
Drug, herbal and dietary supplement hepatotoxicity
 21 April 2015 
Risk factors of postpartum bowel changes
 21 April 2015 
Tracking colonoscopy surveillance intervals
 21 April 2015 
PPI increases risk of cryptogenic liver abscess
 20 April 2015 
IBS after traveller's diarhea
 20 April 2015 
Economic impact of C. diff infection
 20 April 2015 
Adherence to Hep C treatments
 17 April 2015 
Synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia
 17 April 2015 
PNPLA3 polymorphisms and NAFLD risk
 17 April 2015 
MELD score and colorectal resection
 16 April 2015 
Bleeding risk in colonic diverticulosis
 16 April 2015 
Minority use of high-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer
 16 April 2015 
Sleep and IBD
 15 April 2015 
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 April 2015 
Score predicts malignant bile duct obstruction
 15 April 2015 
Increased risk of Barrett esophagus
 14 April 2015 
Improving colorectal cancer screening uptake
 14 April 2015 
Colorectal cancer presenting under the age of 50
 14 April 2015 
Functional constipation vs constipation predominant IBS
 13 April 2015 
Fecal transplant for C. difficile
 13 April 2015 
Immune based treatments for HCC
 13 April 2015 
CRP and acute diverticulitis
 10 April 2015 
Hypnotherapy for IBS
 10 April 2015 
Adjuvant therapy after rectal cancer
 10 April 2015 
Viral outcomes in HCV infection
 09 April 2015 
Male IBD patients wishing to conceive
 09 April 2015 
Screening programs based on the fecal immunochemical test
 09 April 2015 
Management of esophageal food impaction
 08 April 2015 
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity
 08 April 2015 
Ambulatory hemorrhoidal surgery
 08 April 2015 
Iron fortification and gut inflammation
 07 April 2015 
Endoscopic managements of GI bleeds
 07 April 2015 
Interventions for eosinophilic esophagitis
 07 April 2015 
Treatment of Hep C virus
 06 April 2015 
Treatment for rectal cancer
 06 April 2015 
Risk stratifying Barrett's esophagus
 06 April 2015 
Cost-effectiveness of HCV
 03 April 2015 
Predicting advanced cancer in Barrett's
 03 April 2015 
Vitamin D deficiency and Hep B outcomes
 03 April 2015 
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in cirrhosis
 02 April 2015 
Physical activity and NAFLD
 02 April 2015 
Genetic risk for Crohn's disease
 02 April 2015 
EUS for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
 01 April 2015 
Analysis of liver fibrosis
 01 April 2015 
Obeticholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis
 01 April 2015 
Mortality rates for upper GI bleeds
 31 March 2015 
HCV-HIV co-infection combination therapy
 31 March 2015 
Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes
 31 March 2015 
Hepatic fat and gallbladder polyps
 30 March 2015 
Minimally invasive approach in colorectal procedures
 30 March 2015 
Prevalence of IBD in USA residents of Indian ancestry
 30 March 2015 
Treatment of pediatric IBD
 27 March 2015 
Screening for fecal incontinence
 27 March 2015 
Deep remission in Crohn's disease

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us