Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 26 June 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Optimum bowel cleansing before colonoscopy

This month's issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology examines a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy.

News image

Optimal bowel preparation is vital for the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy.

The inconvenience, discomfort, required consumption of large volumes of product, and potential adverse effects associated with some bowel preparations deter patients from colonoscopy, and may provide inadequate cleansing.

A dual-action, non-phosphate, natural orange-flavored, low-volume preparation containing sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (P/MC) is being reviewed for bowel cleansing.

Dr Philip Katz and colleagues from Pennsylvania, USA reported that this was a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blinded, prespecified non-inferiority, head-to-head study.

The team investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of day-before administration of picosulfate and magnesium citrate vs 2L polyethylene glycol solution, and 2 5-mg bisacodyl tablets in adult patients preparing for colonoscopy.

The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of picosulfate and magnesium citrate to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall colon cleansing using a modified Aronchick scale.

The doctors also evaluated the efficacy in the ascending, mid, and recto-sigmoid segments of colon using a modified Ottawa scale.

Patient acceptability and tolerability of the bowel preparations were assessed via a standard questionnaire.

Adverse events related to the bowel preparation were reported by 1% of patients
American Journal of Gastroenterology

The research team assessed safety based on the monitoring of adverse events and meaningful findings on clinical evaluations including physical examinations, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiograms.

A total of 603 patients were randomized to receive either picosulfate and magnesium citrate or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

The team of doctors noted that based on the Aronchick scale, successful overall cleansing was similar in patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate.

Patients receiving 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets picosulfate and magnesium citrate demonstrated non-inferiority to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall cleansing of the colon, as measured by the Aronchick scale.

Similarly, the efficacy of picosulfate and magnesium citrate , as measured by the Ottawa scale, was non-inferior to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in cleansing the ascending, mid, and recto-sigmoid segments of the colon.

The researchers noted that patient-reported acceptability and tolerability for each item examined on the questionnaire was significantly greater for picosulfate and magnesium citrate compared with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

Treatment-emergent adverse events related to the bowel preparation reported by 1% of patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets were nausea, vomiting, and headache.

No clinically meaningful changes were noted in either treatment arm in data collected from physical examinations, vital sign measurements, and ECGs.

Dr Katz's team commented "When administered as a day-before dose, the bowel cleansing effects of picosulfate and magnesium citrate were non-inferior compared with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets using the clinician-rated Aronchick and Ottawa scales."

"Treatment acceptability was significantly more favorable in patients receiving picosulfate and magnesium citrate  than in patients receiving 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets."

Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 401–409
20 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis
 03 June 2016 
Antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhosis
 03 June 2016 
Mortality in hospitalized peptic ulcer patients
 03 June 2016 
Decision aid for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis
 02 June 2016 
Allergy tests for eosinophilic esophagitis
 02 June 2016 
Fatty liver disease and mortality
 02 June 2016 
Ethnic inequalities in rectal cancer care
 01 June 2016 
Predicting NASH resolution
 01 June 2016 
Predicting relapse in IBD
 01 June 2016 
Treatment of Hep C/HIV after liver transplant
 31 May 2016 
Markers as a reflection of inflammatory burden in ulcerative colitis
 31 May 2016 
Predicting Crohn's diseases before diagnosis
 31 May 2016 
Biomarker predicts post ERCP pancreatitis
 30 May 2016 
Challenges for direct-acting antivirals in Hep C
 30 May 2016 
Endoscopic indices for disease activity in ulcerative colitis
 30 May 2016 
Colonoscopy reimbursement reduction in practice

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us