Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 25 September 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Patient attitudes to colonoscopy and the importance of endoscopist interaction

This month's issue of the Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology evaluates patient attitudes to colonoscopy and the importance of endoscopist interaction and the endoscopy environment to satisfaction and value.

News image

Understanding patients' attitudes to their medical experience is essential for identifying value in the patient pathway, optimizing care and use of resources.

Dr Jude McEntire from the United Kingdom determined patients' preferences and expectations for day case colonoscopy, a common gastrointestinal procedure for which there is limited such data.

The team invited patients attending for elective colonoscopy to complete a composite, validated dedicated endoscopy questionnaire, with Likert-scale questions and a 15-point preference scale of domains of endoscopy care that were considered most important to least important as contributing to a satisfactory experience.

The team reported that 216 out of 224 patients returned questionnaires.

Moderate to severe anxiety was recorded in 56% of patients, commonly with respect to anticipation of pain or the results of the procedure.

Moderate to severe anxiety was recorded in 56% of patients
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

The doctors found that the median values for ranked preference scores consistent with greatest importance for satisfaction were technical skill of the endoscopist, discomfort during the procedure, and manner of the endoscopist.

Factors considered of relatively low importance included the single-sex environment, noise levels, and explanation of delay.

The research team noted that only 14% of patients responded that they would be prepared to delay an appointment for a single-sex environment.

Dr McEntire's team concluded, "Patients undergoing colonoscopy highly prioritize aspects of care relating to the interaction with the endoscopist and the procedure itself."

"Environment factors are considered to be less important."

"These findings may assist in service redesign around patient-identified value within the patient pathway."

Scand J Gastroenterol 2013: (48)3: 366-373
07 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 23 September 2016 
Exercise for NAFLD
 23 September 2016 
BMI history and fatty liver
 23 September 2016 
Sleep quality in nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients
 22 September 2016 
Predicting small-bowel Crohn’s disease
 22 September 2016 
Technology vs intervention for weight loss
 22 September 2016 
Colectomy outcomes for ulcerative colitis
 21 September 2016 
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates
 21 September 2016 
Employment status and IBD
 21 September 2016 
Patients vs providers on nutrition in IBD
 20 September 2016 
Improving healthcare systems for viral Hepatitis
 20 September 2016 
GI benefits of COX-2 selective inhibitors
 20 September 2016 
Predicting relapse in Crohn's
 19 September 2016 
Prevalence of esophageal cancer in Barrett's
 19 September 2016 
Fecal microbiota transplantation and CDI in IBD
 19 September 2016 
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
 16 September 2016 
Low-residue diet before colonoscopy and bowel cleansing
 16 September 2016 
Genome-wide association in gastric cancer
 16 September 2016 
H. pylori in children with asthma
 15 September 2016 
Improving survival in cholangitis-associated septic shock
 15 September 2016 
Colorectal cancer survival and hospital volumes
 15 September 2016 
Primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD
 14 September 2016 
Intestinal malabsorption and olmesartan
 14 September 2016 
Infection reduction strategy after colorectal resection
 14 September 2016 
Predicting long-term infliximab use in Crohn's
 13 September 2016 
Predicting survival in refractory celiac disease
 13 September 2016 
Cancer risk stratification in Barrett’s
 13 September 2016 
Screening vs non-screening colonoscopy
 12 September 2016 
Screening in familial colorectal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Metformin improves survival in pancreatic ductal cancer
 12 September 2016 
Consent guidelines for GI endoscopy procedures
 09 September 2016 
Development of IBS
 09 September 2016 
Safe and effective treatment for NASH
 09 September 2016 
Scale for stool measurement in diarrhea-IBS
 08 September 2016 
Prognostic factors for infliximab in Crohn's
 08 September 2016 
Chronic Hep B vs chronic Hep C and mortality
 08 September 2016 
Hematological malignancies in IBD
 07 September 2016 
IBD relapse during pregnancy
 07 September 2016 
New treatments for ulcerative colitis
 07 September 2016 
Alternative to nucleic acid testing in HCV
 06 September 2016 
Endoscopy clinic no-shows
 06 September 2016 
Risk of infection after elective colorectal surgery
 06 September 2016 
EHealth technologies in IBD
 05 September 2016 
Esophageal impedance monitoring
 05 September 2016 
Family history and IBD clinical course
 05 September 2016 
Biomarker for IBD and GI cancer
 02 September 2016 
Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and GERD 
 02 September 2016 
Postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum
 02 September 2016 
Postop recurrence of Crohn's
 01 September 2016 
Prognostic test for liver transplants
 01 September 2016 
Recovery after colorectal surgery in elderly patients
 01 September 2016 
Obesity and post-ERCP pancreatitis
 30 August 2016 
NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis
 30 August 2016 
Quality improvement program after colorectal surgery
 30 August 2016 
Gut microbial diversity in smokers with Crohn's
 29 August 2016 
Reducing Hep B-related HCC
 29 August 2016 
Hep B immunization of infants for liver cancer
 29 August 2016 
Risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 26 August 2016 
Reasons for premature surveillance colonoscopy
 26 August 2016 
Celiac disease therapeutics
 26 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic dissection-induced gastric ulcers

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us