Help
Subscribe


Submit Videos to GastroHep Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography

The latest issue of Endoscopy investigates time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography.

News image

Time limitations and unwanted health effects may act as barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Dr van Dam and colleagues from the Netherlands measured the time requirements and health effects of colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography screening.

The team performed a prospective diary study in a consecutive sample within a randomized controlled colorectal cancer screening trial, comparing primary colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography screening for average-risk individuals aged 50 - 74 years.

The diary ended when all screening-related complaints had passed.

The researchers reported that the diary was returned by 75% of colonoscopy, and 75% of computed tomography colonography screenees.

CT colonography was associated with a 2-fold longer duration of screening-related symptoms
Endoscopy

The median interval between leaving home and returning from the examination was longer for colonoscopy than for computed tomography colonography.

The team of doctors found that the time to return to routine activities was longer after colonoscopy than after computed tomography colonography.

The duration of screening-related symptoms after the examination was shorter for colonoscopy than for computed tomography colonography.

The research team assessed that abdominal complaints were reported more frequently after computed tomography colonography.

Anxiety, pain, and quality of life worsened during the screening process, with no differences between the 2 examinations.

Compared with colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography screening required less time and allowed screenees to return to their daily activities more quickly.

The doctors noted that in contrast, computed tomography colonography was associated with a 2-fold longer duration of screening-related symptoms.

Dr van Dam's team concludes, "Feelings of anxiety, pain, and quality of life scores were similar during colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography screening."

"These results should be incorporated into cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening techniques."

Endoscopy 2013; 45(03): 182-188
06 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 28 March 2015

Advanced search
 27 March 2015 
Screening for fecal incontinence
 27 March 2015 
Deep remission in Crohn's disease
 27 March 2015 
Sexual functioning in IBD
 26 March 2015 
Antimicrobial therapy in cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 26 March 2015 
Metformin as a chemopreventive agent for Barrett's
 26 March 2015 
Survival of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Genetics and Crohn's disease
 25 March 2015 
Mortality in Barrett’s–related T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
 25 March 2015 
Cytomegalovirus and IBD
 24 March 2015 
Prevention of colorectal cancer after screening
 24 March 2015 
Functional GI disorders and body mass index
 24 March 2015 
Quality of life in children with fecal incontinence
 23 March 2015 
Fibrosis in NAFLD vs NASH
 23 March 2015 
The unmasking of Whipple's disease
 23 March 2015 
Predicting the quality of colon cancer care
 20 March 2015 
Interventions for eosinophilic esophagitis
 20 March 2015 
Colorectal cancer risk and genetic variants
 20 March 2015 
Screening for Barrett's esophagus
 19 March 2015 
Hypnotherapy for IBS
 19 March 2015 
Poor mental and physical health in HCV
 19 March 2015 
Dedicated care for diverticular disease
 18 March 2015 
Practice guidelines for colorectal polyps
 18 March 2015 
Out-of-hours endoscopy for upper GI bleeding
 18 March 2015 
H. pylori eradication and lipids
 17 March 2015 
H. pylori test-and-treat program and gastric cancer
 17 March 2015 
Adalimumab in Crohn’s disease
 17 March 2015 

Low-dose PPIs and GI bleeding in patients receiving aspirin

 16 March 2015 
Microscopic colitis
 16 March 2015 
Cholestasis of pregnancy with HCV
 16 March 2015 
Hybrid therapy for H. pylori
 13 March 2015 
Medicare patients and payments to gastroenterologists
 13 March 2015 
Appendectomy in ulcerative colitis
 13 March 2015 

Racial disparities in gluten-sensitive problems

 12 March 2015 
Predicting IBD in IBS patients
 12 March 2015 
Patient knowledge of IBS
 12 March 2015 
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity
 11 March 2015 

Prediction of malignant bile duct obstruction

 11 March 2015 
NAFLD–related hepatocellular carcinoma
 11 March 2015 
Assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis
 10 March 2015 
Risk for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms
 10 March 2015 
Poor disease course in pediatric ulcerative colitis
 10 March 2015 
Outcomes in Crohn's therapy
 09 March 2015 
Fibre usage in ulcerative colitis in remission
 09 March 2015 
Gastric Cancer detection during GI endosocopy
 09 March 2015 
Risk of C. difficile upon hospital admission
 06 March 2015 
Second anti-TNF in IBD
 06 March 2015 
Efficacy of Hep E vaccine
 06 March 2015 
Steroid therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis
 05 March 2015 
EPHXI polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk
 05 March 2015 
Infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy in ulcerative colitis
 05 March 2015 
Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon and rectum
 04 March 2015 
Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer
 04 March 2015 
Management of IBD
 04 March 2015 
Progression of Barrett's
 03 March 2015 
EPHX1 polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk
 03 March 2015 
GI bleeding in chronic kidney disease patients on aspirin
 03 March 2015 
Risk of anastomotic leak after colectomy
 02 March 2015 
Genes and early diagnosis of IBD
 02 March 2015 
Assessment of GERD
 02 March 2015 
Liver disease in patients awaiting liver transplant

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2015 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us