Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 01 July 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

PPIs influence the outcomes of peptic ulcer bleeding

The latest issue of the Scandanavian Journal of Gastroenterology exmines the effect of proton pump inhibitors on the outcomes of peptic ulcer bleeding.

News image

Dr Angel Lanas and colleagues assessed clinical outcomes in patients treated with proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic hemostasis in routine clinical care, and compared these outcomes to those seen in a randomized controlled trial of i.v. esomeprazole.

Patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and endoscopic stigmata of recent hemorrhage, who were treated with i.v. esomeprazole or pantoprazole 120 mg/day following therapeutic endoscopy, were identified from 12 hospitals in Spain.

reported that outcomes assessed included further bleeding, all-cause mortality and surgery.

The results were compared to those of the randomized controlled trial Results.

The team of doctors noted that overall, 9% of patients experienced further bleeding within 72 hours following initial endoscopy, 14% of patients had further bleeding within 30 days, and 3%  of patients died within 30 days.

9% of patients experienced further bleeding within 72 hours following initial endoscopy
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

In the randomized controlled trial, the rate of rebleeding within 72 hours was significantly lower in the esomeprazole arm than in the placebo arm.

The research team found that the further bleeding rate in patients treated with esomeprazole in routine clinical practice was between these 2 values.

Similar results were seen with the other outcomes studied.

Dr Lana's team concludes, "The proportion of patients treated with i.v. esomeprazole in routine clinical practice who experienced further bleeding following endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding was between the rates observed in the esomeprazole group, and the placebo group in the randomized controlled trial."

Scand J Gastroenterol 2013: 48(3): 285-294
07 March 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 01 July 2016 
Aspirin and colorectal cancer
 01 July 2016 
Outcome measures in celiac disease
 01 July 2016 
Growth factor activity and IBD
 30 June 2016 
Staging system for familial adenomatous polyposis
 30 June 2016 
Antibiotics in children and obesity
 30 June 2016 
IBS-type symptoms in pediatric IBD
 29 June 2016 
Hep C eradication in people who inject drugs
 29 June 2016 
Anti-tumor necrosis factor in mothers and newborns
 29 June 2016 
Progression to esophageal carcinoma in Barrett's
 28 June 2016 
Gastric cancer screening in the USA
 28 June 2016 
Acute severe ulcerative colitis
 28 June 2016 
Cancer recurrence after immune-suppressive therapies
 27 June 2016 
Epidemiology of NAFLD
 27 June 2016 
Tobacco smoking and ulcerative colitis
 27 June 2016 
The Toronto Consensus for H. pylori treatment
 24 June 2016 
Statins and colorectal cancer in IBD
 24 June 2016 
Dietary trends in the USA
 24 June 2016 
Fibre for chronic idiopathic constipation
 23 June 2016 
Biomarker for eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosis
 23 June 2016 
Touch screens in the IBD outpatient clinic
 23 June 2016 
Adverse events after colonoscopy bowel preparations
 22 June 2016 
Benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening
 22 June 2016 
IBS symptoms in IBD
 22 June 2016 
Outcomes among US veterans with Hep B
 21 June 2016 
Screening for colorectal cancer
 21 June 2016 
Tenofovir and Hep B transmission in mothers
 21 June 2016 
Access to liver subspecialty care and survival
 20 June 2016 
Genes for colorectal cancer risk
 20 June 2016 
Patients and gastroenterologists’ perceptions on IBD
 20 June 2016 
Hep C treatment in people who inject drugs
 17 June 2016 
Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis
 17 June 2016 
Predictors of starting with long-term PPIs
 17 June 2016 
Extrahepatic manifestations of Hep C
 16 June 2016 
Assessing progression of NAFLD
 16 June 2016 
Endotracheal intubation and endoscopy unit efficiency metrics
 16 June 2016 
Bile acid diarrhea
 15 June 2016 
Consensus for acute severe ulcerative colitis
 15 June 2016 
Dental erosions in GERD
 15 June 2016 
Pharmacological treatments for obesity with weight loss
 14 June 2016 
Antibiotics and gut inflammation
 14 June 2016 
Liver-related mortality in the developed world
 14 June 2016 
Hep C patient outcomes treated with different anti-viral regimens
 13 June 2016 
Obesity in the USA
 13 June 2016 
Celiac disease drug development
 13 June 2016 
Pneumonia risk in celiac disease
 10 June 2016 

Celiac disease drug development

 10 June 2016 
Rectal cancer surgery checklist
 10 June 2016 
Breath as a marker for IBS
 09 June 2016 
Psychological morbidity in young people with IBD
 09 June 2016 
Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 09 June 2016 
Evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's
 08 June 2016 
Adult obesity trends in the USA
 08 June 2016 
Pediatric IBD unclassified vs other IBD
 08 June 2016 
Dark chocolate and NASH oxidation
 07 June 2016 
Flexible endoscopy for Zenker's diverticulum
 07 June 2016 
Predicting risk of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
 07 June 2016 
Electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy
 06 June 2016 
Disturbed sleep and symptoms in IBS
 06 June 2016 
Oral contraceptives and Crohn’s complications
 06 June 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us