Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 08 February 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy

The latest issue of Gut identifies factors determining adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy.

News image

Screening colonoscopy outcome quality is best determined by the adenoma detection rate.

The substantial variability in the adenoma detection rates between endoscopists may reflect different skills, experience and/or equipment.

Dr Andreas Adler from Germany analyzed the potential factors that may influence adenoma detection rate variance, including case volume.

The researchers prospectively studied 12,134 consecutive screening colonoscopies from 21 Berlin private-practice colonoscopists over 18 months.

The data were analyzed using a 2-level mixed linear model to adequately address the characteristics of patients and colonoscopists.

The adenoma detection rate was regressed after considering sex, age, bowel cleanliness, NSAID intake, annual Screening colonoscopy case volume, lifetime experience, instrument withdrawal times, instrument generations used, and the number of annual continuing medical education meetings attended by the physician.

The factors that were related to the colonoscopists were the number of CME meetings attended
Gut

The case volume was also retrospectively analyzed from the 2007 national screening colonoscopy registry data.

The team of doctors found that patient factors that correlated with the adenoma detection rate were sex, age and low quality of bowel preparation.

The factors that were related to the colonoscopists were the number of CME meetings attended and instrument generation.

The team observed that these factors accounted for approximately 40% of the interphysician variability.

With the findings of the study the researchers noted that within a narrow range, the withdrawal time was not correlated with the adenoma detection rate.

Annual screening case volume did not correlate with the adenoma detection rate, and this finding was confirmed by the German registry data.

Dr Adler's team concludes "The outcome quality of screening colonoscopies is mainly influenced by individual colonoscopist factors and instrument quality."

Gut 2013; 62: 236-241
22 January 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 08 February 2016 
Immunity in the human gut
 08 February 2016 
Cancelled colonoscopy appointments
 08 February 2016 
Cognitive function in Crohn's disease
 05 February 2016 
Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia
 05 February 2016 
Treatment for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn’s colitis
 05 February 2016 
Methotrexate and remission in ulcerative colitis
 04 February 2016 
Diabetes and liver cancer
 04 February 2016 
Colorectal cancer screening
 04 February 2016 
H. pylori and coronary heart disease 
 03 February 2016 
Acute diverticulitis and IBS 
 03 February 2016 
Microbiota of the colonic mucosa and chronic constipation
 03 February 2016 
Guidelines for chronic pancreatitis
 02 February 2016 
Ramosetron and IBS-diarrhea
 02 February 2016 
IBD emergency department visits
 02 February 2016 
Probiotics for H. pylori management
 01 February 2016 
Managing HBV in pregnancy
 01 February 2016 
Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma risk
 01 February 2016 
Depressive symptoms in IBD 
 29 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after colonoscopy
 29 January 2016 
Acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients
 29 January 2016 
Vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk
 28 January 2016 
Tissue anti-TNF drug levels and IBD
 28 January 2016 
First line treatment of H. pylori infection
 28 January 2016 
Tetracycline for rosacea increases the risk of IBD
 27 January 2016 
Steroids in children with Crohn's
 27 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program 
 27 January 2016 
Human gut microbiome in IBD 
 26 January 2016 
Smoking and symptomatic diverticular disease
 26 January 2016 
Step-down therapy in PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia 
 26 January 2016 
Diet and IBD risk
 25 January 2016 
IBD monitoring using smartphones
 25 January 2016 
Self-management IBS program
 25 January 2016 
Colorectal cancer after a negative screening sigmoidoscopy
 22 January 2016 
Length of Barrett's and cancer
 22 January 2016 
Psychosocial interventions and alcohol abstinence in chronic liver disease
 22 January 2016 
Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance
 21 January 2016 
Increasing adenoma detection rate during colonoscope withdrawal
 21 January 2016 
Microscopic colitis current concepts
 21 January 2016 
Statins as a management strategy for constipation 
 20 January 2016 
Health status after bariatric surgery
 20 January 2016 
Hep E infection in West Africa
 20 January 2016 
Preventing endoscopic bacterial transmission
 19 January 2016 
PPIs and phlebotomy in hereditary hemochromatosis
 19 January 2016 
Predicting liver cirrhosis in Hep C
 19 January 2016 
Frozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation
 18 January 2016 
Hospitalization for diverticulitis in the USA
 18 January 2016 
H. pylori and gastric cancer across Europe
 18 January 2016 
Enteral nutrition in children with Crohn's
 15 January 2016 
Alcohol- and HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma
 15 January 2016 
Recurrent colonic diverticulitis
 15 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk
 14 January 2016 
Risk stratification of incidentally discovered gallstones
 14 January 2016 
Treatment of refractory cholestatic pruritus
 14 January 2016 
Colonic diverticula and colorectal cancer risk 
 13 January 2016 
C-section delivery and IBD risk
 13 January 2016 
Primary biliary cholangitis treatment with incomplete UDCA response
 13 January 2016 
Colon cancer screening rates 
 12 January 2016 
Eosinophilic esophagitis endoscopic reference score
 12 January 2016 
Web-based tool for Crohn's disease
 12 January 2016 
IBD patients willingnes to accept medication risk

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us