Help
Subscribe


GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy

 29 August 2016

Advanced search
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy

The latest issue of Gut identifies factors determining adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy.

News image

Screening colonoscopy outcome quality is best determined by the adenoma detection rate.

The substantial variability in the adenoma detection rates between endoscopists may reflect different skills, experience and/or equipment.

Dr Andreas Adler from Germany analyzed the potential factors that may influence adenoma detection rate variance, including case volume.

The researchers prospectively studied 12,134 consecutive screening colonoscopies from 21 Berlin private-practice colonoscopists over 18 months.

The data were analyzed using a 2-level mixed linear model to adequately address the characteristics of patients and colonoscopists.

The adenoma detection rate was regressed after considering sex, age, bowel cleanliness, NSAID intake, annual Screening colonoscopy case volume, lifetime experience, instrument withdrawal times, instrument generations used, and the number of annual continuing medical education meetings attended by the physician.

The factors that were related to the colonoscopists were the number of CME meetings attended
Gut

The case volume was also retrospectively analyzed from the 2007 national screening colonoscopy registry data.

The team of doctors found that patient factors that correlated with the adenoma detection rate were sex, age and low quality of bowel preparation.

The factors that were related to the colonoscopists were the number of CME meetings attended and instrument generation.

The team observed that these factors accounted for approximately 40% of the interphysician variability.

With the findings of the study the researchers noted that within a narrow range, the withdrawal time was not correlated with the adenoma detection rate.

Annual screening case volume did not correlate with the adenoma detection rate, and this finding was confirmed by the German registry data.

Dr Adler's team concludes "The outcome quality of screening colonoscopies is mainly influenced by individual colonoscopist factors and instrument quality."

Gut 2013; 62: 236-241
22 January 2013

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 29 August 2016 
Risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 29 August 2016 
Hep B immunization of infants for liver cancer
 29 August 2016 
Reducing Hep B-related HCC
 26 August 2016 
Celiac disease therapeutics
 26 August 2016 
Reasons for premature surveillance colonoscopy
 26 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic dissection-induced gastric ulcers
 25 August 2016 
Short-chain fatty acids in mixed refractory constipation
 25 August 2016 
Stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening
 25 August 2016 
Post-infectious IBS in C. diff
 24 August 2016 
Hep B after infant vaccination program
 24 August 2016 
Obeticholic acid for primary biliary cholangitis
 24 August 2016 
Genetics and therapy response in IBD
 23 August 2016 
Colorectal cancer genetics as biomarkers
 23 August 2016 
Prognostic test for mortality after liver transplant
 23 August 2016 
Postoperative mortality in elderly with IBD
 22 August 2016 
Celiac disease in the elderly
 22 August 2016 
Laparoscopic vs open colectomy databases
 22 August 2016 
Mucosal healing and ulcerative colitis outcomes
 19 August 2016 
Dietary questionnaire for GI clinics
 19 August 2016 
Botox treatment for chronic anal fissure
 19 August 2016 
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in GI cancers
 18 August 2016 
Gallstone formation determinants
 18 August 2016 
Age disparities in IBD therapy
 18 August 2016 
Seasonal variation in diverticulitis
 17 August 2016 
IBD activity score for routine clinical use
 17 August 2016 
Attitudes to H. pylori in primary care
 17 August 2016 
Nonselective β-blockers and mortality in cirrhosis
 16 August 2016 
Upper GI lesions in adults with IBD
 16 August 2016 
C. difficile infection and mortality when managed by GI surgeons
 16 August 2016 
HCV eradication in cirrhosis
 15 August 2016 
Predicting favorable outcomes in IBD
 15 August 2016 
Scoring system predicted microscopic colitis
 15 August 2016 
Mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 12 August 2016 
Recurrence of resected gastric cancer
 12 August 2016 
Screening for pancreatic cancer
 12 August 2016 
Index for diagnostic accuracy of Crohn's
 11 August 2016 
Colorectal neoplasm on surveillance colonoscopies
 11 August 2016 
Bowel disease in primary care patients with bowel symptoms
 11 August 2016 
Diagnosis in covert hepatic encephalopathy
 10 August 2016 
Maintenance therapy for children with eosinophilic esophagitis
 10 August 2016 
Moderate alcohol use and insulin action in HCV
 10 August 2016 
Consensus on the management of GERD
 09 August 2016 
Pancreatitis quality of life instrument
 09 August 2016 
Gallstone disease and NAFLD
 09 August 2016 
Steroid dependency and IBD
 08 August 2016 
Venous thromboembolism in celiac disease
 08 August 2016 
C. diff in IBD 
 08 August 2016 
Gut-directed hypnotherapy vs low FODMAP diet in IBS
 05 August 2016 
Therapy for H.pylori treatment
 05 August 2016 
Obesity and the development of NAFLD
 05 August 2016 
Obesity and CVD in celiac disease
 04 August 2016 
Bleeding after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions
 04 August 2016 
Novel risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis
 04 August 2016 
Ondansetron for children with acute gastroenteritis
 03 August 2016 
Post-colonoscopy complications
 03 August 2016 
IVF in women with IBD
 03 August 2016 
Post-operative pancreatic fistulae after pancreatic surgery
 02 August 2016 
H. pylori in children
 02 August 2016 
Gastric cancer in patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia
 02 August 2016 
Behavioral changes and bariatric surgery

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2016 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us