Help
Subscribe


Submit Videos to GastroHep Read For FREE - Our full range of review articles
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy
GastroHep.com - the global online resource for all aspects of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy Profile of Guido Tytgat Profile of Pete Peterson Profile of Peter Cotton Profile of Roy Pounder

Home

News  
Journals
Review Articles
Slide Atlas
Video Clips
Online Books
Advanced Digestive Endoscopy
Classical Cases
Conference Diary
PubMed
International GH Links
USA GH Links
National GH Links
National GI Societies
Other Useful Links




Emails on Gastroenterology and Hepatology
the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project
Visit the gastroenterology section of the EUMS

News

Colonoscopy vs non-cathartic CT-colonography in colorectal cancer screening

A study in the latest issue of Gut examines the burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening program.

News image

CT-colonography has been suggested to be less burdensome for primary colorectal cancer screening than colonoscopy.

Dr Thomas de Wijkerslooth and colleagues from the Netherlands compared the expected and perceived burden of both in a randomized trial.

The team identified 8844 Dutch citizens aged 50–74 years who were randomly invited for colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or CT-colonography.

The team performed colonoscopy after full colon lavage, or CT-colonography after limited bowel preparation.

All invitees were asked to complete the expected burden questionnaire before the procedure.

The perceived burden was 79% with colonoscopy
Gut

All participants were invited to complete the perceived burden questionnaire 14 days later.

The researchers found that the expected burden was 36% with colonoscopy, and 41% of CT-colonography invitees completed the expected burden questionnaire.

Colonoscopy invitees expected the bowel preparation and screening procedure to be more burdensome than CT-colonography invitees.

The team observed that the perceived burden was 79% with colonoscopy, and 82% of CT-colonography participants completed the perceived burden questionnaire.

The full screening procedure was reported as more burdensome in CT-colonography than in colonoscopy.

Drinking the bowel preparation resulted in a higher burden score in colonoscopy while related bowel movements were scored more burdensome in CT-colonography.

Most participants would probably or definitely take part in a next screening round, at 96% for colonoscopy and 93% for CT-colonography.

Dr de Wijkerslooth's team commented, "In a colorectal cancer screening program, colonoscopy invitees expected the screening procedure and bowel preparation to be more burdensome than CT-colonography invitees."

"In participants, CT-colonography was scored as more burdensome than colonoscopy. Intended participation in a next screening round was comparable."

Gut 2012; 61: 1552-1559
08 October 2012

Go to top of page Email this page Email this page to a colleague

 25 July 2014

Advanced search
 25 July 2014 
De-escalation of therapy in IBD
 25 July 2014 
Bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes
 25 July 2014 
Primary care physician counselling and colonoscopy
 24 July 2014 
Diagnostic tool for obscure-overt GI bleeding
 24 July 2014 
Statin use and Barrett’s esophagus
 24 July 2014 
Atopy and functional GI disorders
 23 July 2014 
Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for Hep C
 23 July 2014 
Early corticosteroids after the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis
 23 July 2014 
C-section and IBD risk
 22 July 2014 
Thromboembolism in IBD
 22 July 2014 
Alcohol and colorectal adenoma risk
 22 July 2014 
Cognitive behavioral therapy in IBS
 21 July 2014 
Stents to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
 21 July 2014 
Psychometric validation of IBS symptom severity
 21 July 2014 
Mortality in IBD
 18 July 2014 
Treatment of enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
 18 July 2014 
Ulcer complications and dyspeptic symptoms
 18 July 2014 
ERCP with overtube-assisted enteroscopy
 17 July 2014 
Treatment of H. pylori
 17 July 2014 
Ultrasound for diagnosis of gastric varices
 17 July 2014 
Small intestinal permeability in diarrhea predominant IBS
 16 July 2014 
Mortality after colectomy in IBD
 16 July 2014 
Esophageal cancer missed at endoscopy
 16 July 2014 
Screening for Hepatitis B
 15 July 2014 
Diagnosing diverticulitis
 15 July 2014 
Variation in management decisions for colorectal cancer
 15 July 2014 
Muscle cramps in cirrhosis
 14 July 2014 
Predicting the course of ulcerative colitis
 14 July 2014 
Choice in colorectal cancer screening tests
 14 July 2014 
Adhesions in abdominal surgery
 11 July 2014 
Temporal evolution of antidrug antibodies in IBD
 11 July 2014 
Atopy and functional gastrointestinal disorders
 11 July 2014 
Fecal microbiota transplant for C. diff
 10 July 2014 
Acid-suppressive medications and cancer risk in Barrett's
 10 July 2014 
Personalized medicine in the management of IBD
 10 July 2014 
Pregnancy outcome in anti-TNF treated women with IBD
 09 July 2014 
Quality of care provided to patients with varices
 09 July 2014 
Eosinophilic esophagitis and celiac disease
 09 July 2014 
Diagnosis and management of adult celiac disease
 08 July 2014 
Screening for Hep B
 08 July 2014 
NSAID-induced small intestinal injury
 08 July 2014 
Drug-induced liver injury
 07 July 2014 
Obesity and complications after lapaproscopic colorectal surgery
 07 July 2014 
Everolimus and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
 07 July 2014 
Pediatric celiac disease risk factors
 04 July 2014 
Day-case vs inpatient laparoscopic fundoplication
 04 July 2014 
Alcohol assessment in liver transplant
 04 July 2014 
Clinical competence in colorectal cancer surgery
 03 July 2014 
Predicting acute liver failure in drug-induced liver injury
 03 July 2014 
Cognitive dysfunction impairs quality of life after liver transplant
 03 July 2014 
NOTES for colon resections
 02 July 2014 
Routine colonoscopy for uncomplicated diverticulitis
 02 July 2014 
Risk of stroke in ulcerative colitis
 02 July 2014 
Hemodialysis during liver transplant
 01 July 2014 
Outcomes for pregnant women with primary biliary cirrhosis
 01 July 2014 
Liver-prognosis assessment in Hep C
 01 July 2014 
Mortality from biliary diseases requiring ERCP
 30 June 2014 
Combination therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori
 30 June 2014 
Drug-induced liver injury
 30 June 2014 
Surrogate for adenoma detection rate

Blackwell Publishing


GastroHep.com is a Blackwell Publishing registered trademark
© 2014 Wiley-Blackwell and GastroHep.com and contributors
Privacy Statement
Disclaimer
About Us