|
There are 350,000,000 people worldwide chronically infected with Hepatitis B, with four million acute infections annually. With infection concentrated in hard-to-reach populations and low resource settings, rapid point-of-care tests offer an efficient screening alternative to laboratory tests. Dr Nitika Pant Pai and colleagues from Canada conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate accuracy of rapid point-of-care tests screening for Hepatitis B. There were 2 reviewers that searched four databases, critiqued quality.  | | In subgroup 1, the pooled sensitivity was 95% | | American Journal of Gastroenterology |
A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis correcting for imperfect reference standards was used. Based on components of the antigen–antibody response, 17 studies were stratified into 3 subgroups. The first subgroup included Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) tests, the second subgroup included anti-HBsAg tests, and the third included HBs+eAg tests. The researchers found that pooled estimates on individual tests with sufficient data. In subgroup 1, the pooled sensitivity was 95%, and specificity was 99.5%. The team found that the Determine test reported a pooled sensitivity of 98%, and a specificity of 99.9%. In subgroup 2, sensitivity was 93%, specificity was 93%, and in subgroup 3, the Binax test showed a sensitivity of 96%, and a specificity of 99.8%. Dr Pai's team commented, "HBsAg tests, including Determine, and the HBs+eAg test, Binax showed high accuracy. Improvements in sensitivity of antibody-based tests will enhance their potential for global first-line screening."
|